Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What does future hold for airport security?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 6:56 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
What does future hold for airport security?

Body scans and pat-downs are just the beginning

I don't know if this was posted before, but an interesting article on NBC site:

The pre-Thanksgiving standoff between the Transportation Security Administration and some airline passengers over the federal agencys new screening techniques has left many industry observers wondering: Whats next?

For now, the full-body scanners and enhanced pat-downs are here to stay, according to the TSA. But in the future, air travelers could see additional biometric screening or smarter body scanners and possibly one day a return to pre-pat-down security protocols.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Travel Association called for the creation of a "trusted traveler" program for airline passengers, which it says would result in more secure, efficient and effective screening. Under this system, passengers would be screened for security risks before arriving at the airport, reducing bottlenecks and diverting security resources to higher-risk passengers.

The vast majority of the traveling public poses little threat to our nations security, yet the current approach subjects every passenger to the same security procedures, said Roger Dow, president of the U.S. Travel Association. A trusted traveler program would allow us to focus more security where it is most needed.

The TSA has already conducted a pilot study for a trusted traveler program, said spokesman Greg Soule. But he said the agency plans to remain focused on the new scanners.

"Our goal is for our officers to use the best technology available, coupled with informed security measures to mitigate the threat," Soule said.
Relying on "technology" is the easiest, laziest way to deal with this stuff. I still wonder why the MSM refuses to ask tough questions to Nappy, like what exactly makes you qualified for your job?
flyinbob is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 7:03 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,098
Originally Posted by flyinbob
Relying on "technology" is the easiest, laziest way to deal with this stuff. I still wonder why the MSM refuses to ask tough questions to Nappy, like what exactly makes you qualified for your job?
'Relying on "technology"' is the quickest, surest way to line someone's pockets.
chollie is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 7:04 pm
  #3  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Northern California, in the redwoods, on the ocean.
Posts: 437

Relying on "technology" is the easiest, laziest way to deal with this stuff. I still wonder why the MSM refuses to ask tough questions to Nappy, like what exactly makes you qualified for your job?
Ah, but the technology has been paid for and more machines are coming, like the little mill that ground salt, because they've been contracted for and paid for with OUR dollars. Strange I can't remember our ever having been asked if we wanted to put our tax money into such an enterprise...
WindOfFreedom is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 7:16 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 99
there are ways for tsa to phase out the NOS and rapiscan will still make money... selling them to prisons, court houses, third world countries, etc...

i think in the future personal electronics will have to be checked, perhaps even cell phones, as cell phones can be used to trigger explosives in the cargo of planes, perhaps like those ink toner bombers planned.

or maybe, just maybe, we won't be able to take anything with us except a carry-on full of paper clothing and a loin cloth.
sobetraveler is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 8:53 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BHM
Posts: 118
There's a saying in the Infosec business: "Using technology to solve an inherently social problem by itself is futile in the end".

FWIW, some people *did* try to implement trusted flyer programs after 9/11 but they all got eventually canceled because there was no profit to be made (by the right people).
ghostrider10 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.