Community
Wiki Posts
Search

OSHA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 6:59 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
OSHA

Not sure if this has been brought up or even applies to TSA sceeners. Does anyone even know how much radiation the TSO is exposed to by standing next to the NOS for x amount of hours? Would OSHA rules regarding radiation safety even apply?
reallystop is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 7:02 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 555
Originally Posted by reallystop
Not sure if this has been brought up or even applies to TSA sceeners. Does anyone even know how much radiation the TSO is exposed to by standing next to the NOS for x amount of hours? Would OSHA rules regarding radiation safety even apply?
The question's been raised. No one knows and screening clerks aren't even allowed to wear dosimeters. A separate OSHA-like entity covers federal employees.

~~ Irish
IrishDoesntFlyNow is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 7:22 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
TSA isn't issuing lead aprons, so they obviously don't care where the next generation of screeners comes from.
IslandBased is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 10:20 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Don't expect to see any TSOs start wearing lead vests near the backscatter machines. That would just alert the flying public to the potential dangers from these devices.
bosconet is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 10:29 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Between EWR & PHL
Programs: UA MileagePlus dirt (former hard-way Silver); AS Mileage Plan MVP; Hilton Honors Silver
Posts: 1,586
What about a Materials Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)? They're required for things as innocuous as Windex in government settings - surely one must exist for the NoS. Do we, as passengers, have the right to request to see the MSDS that, by all rights, should be on file in the terminal?

(It wouldn't necessarily make a difference, but it sure would throw the TSOs for a loop...)
Critic is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 10:31 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 733
Why are you worried? They're safe.

barbell is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 1:00 am
  #7  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happily living in Frenaros Cyprus having escaped the near-death experience called Sofia Bulgaria
Programs: Etihad Guest Gold, DL FO and 1MM, and a bunch of others at a low level
Posts: 2,060
Originally Posted by Critic
What about a Materials Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)? They're required for things as innocuous as Windex in government settings - surely one must exist for the NoS. Do we, as passengers, have the right to request to see the MSDS that, by all rights, should be on file in the terminal?
MSDSs are not required for pieces of equipment, only for chemicals and chemical substances.

I am amazed that dosimetry is not required for personnel working around the NoS. If I were a TSA screener (and I hope that I never am that destitute or desperate that I have to be one), I would be insisting on a dosimeter and I would be looking for regular radiation checks and equipment calibration and maintenance information. Perhaps there is a dosimter mounted in the are of the machine on not on personnel.

And IIRC OSHA does have jurisdiction at government facilities. At least they did when I worked at one (though I worked for a gov contractor).
STBCypriot is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 1:07 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
The one independent study published (Johns Hopkins) said there was an area (maybe a meter wide?) around certain parts of the scanner where employees could receive a higher-than-recommended dose if the machine was in heavy use.
janetdoe is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 1:24 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ATL
Programs: Lots
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by janetdoe
where employees could receive a higher-than-recommended dose if the machine was in heavy use.
1 meter is ~ 3 feet. TSOs have always been that close to it when I see them.
You mean like during the course of an 8 hour shift? or the 24+ hours it is on?

I've been tempted to 'drop a dosimeter ' near the scanner. I know in Atlanta that no one will notice it for at least a month.
And I'm sure it has been brought up elsewhere - but in the back of my mind with thousands going in it and around it how often is the maintenance and calibration? I'm sure that info is SSI.

Last edited by Qwerty42; Nov 19, 2010 at 1:32 am
Qwerty42 is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 1:47 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
Originally Posted by Qwerty42
1 meter is ~ 3 feet. TSOs have always been that close to it when I see them.
You mean like during the course of an 8 hour shift? or the 24+ hours it is on?

I've been tempted to 'drop a dosimeter ' near the scanner. I know in Atlanta that no one will notice it for at least a month.
And I'm sure it has been brought up elsewhere - but in the back of my mind with thousands going in it and around it how often is the maintenance and calibration? I'm sure that info is SSI.
You can download the pdf here.

Page 26-28 of the report. One of their recommendations is site testing and monitoring because of the potential to exceed the recommended dose.

I was off - at the entry and exit the area has higher-than-recommended radiation to approximately 1.7 feet outside the entrance and exits.
janetdoe is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 7:23 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
Originally Posted by IrishDoesntFlyNow
The question's been raised. No one knows and screening clerks aren't even allowed to wear dosimeters. A separate OSHA-like entity covers federal employees.

~~ Irish
Not allowed, or not provided?

If not provided, let's buy a few.

If not allowed, ehgads.
sbagdon is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 7:37 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ATL
Programs: DL GM / PC APM / SPG GM / GP PM
Posts: 248
what about people required to travel for work? Basically they are required to submit themselves to what ever the TSA says including radiation in order to do there jobs...
N615HL is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 8:07 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,650
Originally Posted by N615HL
what about people required to travel for work? Basically they are required to submit themselves to what ever the TSA says including radiation in order to do there jobs...
Yup.. The PRO TSA people will say that we should just find another way to travel if we don't like this
FriendlySkies is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.