More about why you should avoid backscatter
Jul 31, 2010 | 2:34 pm
#1
Original Poster
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
More about why you should avoid backscatter
While this article applies to hospitals, it is certainly applicable to TSA. I keep thinking of people who have been over-radiated and then are forced to go through WBI.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/he...n.html?_r=1&hp
Does anyone need any more of a reason to avoid WBI?
But an examination by The New York Times has found that radiation overdoses were larger and more widespread than previously known, that patients have reported symptoms considerably more serious than losing their hair, and that experts say they may face long-term risks of cancer and brain damage.
The review also offers insight into the way many of the overdoses occurred. While in some cases technicians did not know how to properly administer the test, interviews with hospital officials and a review of public records raise new questions about the role of manufacturers, including how well they design their software and equipment and train those who use them.
The Times found the biggest overdoses at Huntsville Hospital up to 13 times the amount of radiation generally used in the test.
The review also offers insight into the way many of the overdoses occurred. While in some cases technicians did not know how to properly administer the test, interviews with hospital officials and a review of public records raise new questions about the role of manufacturers, including how well they design their software and equipment and train those who use them.
The Times found the biggest overdoses at Huntsville Hospital up to 13 times the amount of radiation generally used in the test.
Does anyone need any more of a reason to avoid WBI?
Jul 31, 2010 | 5:48 pm
#3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 555
~~ Irish
Jul 31, 2010 | 7:39 pm
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,088
There is no such thing as a "safe" exposure to x-ray. There is only less risky and more risky. For me personally, every exposure is "more risky", so I'll limit my x-ray exposure to those absolutely medically necessary. A backscatter WBI has no medical benefit.
~~ Irish
~~ Irish
Jul 31, 2010 | 8:02 pm
#5
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GNV which is not where we would like to be :)
Programs: ABP, Mr. Mom without the kids, Signor Mucci, DL PM, HH & Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 4,526
IIRC, hospital x-ray machines, because they are adjusted based on what type of x-ray is imaged, the calibration is skewed very easily. The units used by the smurfs are set at one level. Personally, I think the smurfs are wasting the taxpayer's money and need to be disbanded.
Jul 31, 2010 | 8:11 pm
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,650
IIRC, hospital x-ray machines, because they are adjusted based on what type of x-ray is imaged, the calibration is skewed very easily. The units used by the smurfs are set at one level. Personally, I think the smurfs are wasting the taxpayer's money and need to be disbanded.
Aug 1, 2010 | 10:19 am
#7
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere in Florida
Posts: 2,889
The scary part is that this happened with medical-grade equipment, in medical facilities, with trained medical techs.
What standards, if any, do the current backscatter machines comply with? What training, if any, do the TSA techs receive on radiation? What training, if any, do the "repair techs" from the manufacturer have? How often, if ever, are these machines calibrated? Which independent experts are used to verify such machines are operating properly and in compliance? Exactly which frequencies are used and what is the duration and power of exposure? These are all questions which should be answered immediately and openly.
I'll opt-out every time. If they make these machines mandatory, I'll just opt-out of commercial aviation. Gen Av. is far more pleasant. More expensive, but I'll gladly pay whatever it takes to avoid the additional health risk.
What standards, if any, do the current backscatter machines comply with? What training, if any, do the TSA techs receive on radiation? What training, if any, do the "repair techs" from the manufacturer have? How often, if ever, are these machines calibrated? Which independent experts are used to verify such machines are operating properly and in compliance? Exactly which frequencies are used and what is the duration and power of exposure? These are all questions which should be answered immediately and openly.
I'll opt-out every time. If they make these machines mandatory, I'll just opt-out of commercial aviation. Gen Av. is far more pleasant. More expensive, but I'll gladly pay whatever it takes to avoid the additional health risk.