Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Playing "Fun with TSA" -- anyone can do it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 11:18 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: TSO, AS MVP, AOPA member, Private Pilot ASEL
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by pmocek
What you think about this is relevant to this conversation. I'm only asking for your opinion. Will you please share it with us?
Depends on the situation. Artful concealment in and of itself I don't have an issue with. For example, walking down the street and you have a knife hidden in your belt buckle. I don't have a problem with that. If, however, you are artfully concealing something in a deliberate attempt to get around security measures, if it's not illegal where you are doing it, it certainly should be. As another poster said, that shows intent.
TSO1973 is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 11:18 am
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,990
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Interesting conversation, but if I may...

As far as I know "artful concealment" itself is not illegal. However, many people are charged with attempting to circumvent airport security - state law - when the do artfully conceal something that is prohibited in an attempt to enter the sterile area. Do all states have such laws? My guess - just a guess - is that all states do/would have laws regarding circumventing ariport security. But I'm not going to spend the time to look it up, sorry.

So i guess it's up to individual DA interpertation as to whether or not someone accussed of artful concealment who attempted to enter the sterile area has done something illegal or not. And then up to a judge/jury.
Why would a federal agency be acting or assisting in any manner to enforce state law?

Also if a person is found to have "artfully concealed" an item while trying to clear a TSA checkpoint is that issue not often heard by an Administrative Judge?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 12:25 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Why would a federal agency be acting or assisting in any manner to enforce state law?

Also if a person is found to have "artfully concealed" an item while trying to clear a TSA checkpoint is that issue not often heard by an Administrative Judge?
This isn't new. Bring a gun into the checkpoint, for example, you are arrested by local LEOs and charged in a state/city court.

And if TSA imposes a fine, that is administrative. If your charged for attempting to circumvent airport securty by artful concealment, that is criminal and goes to the local DA.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 12:29 pm
  #64  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,990
Originally Posted by SATTSO
This isn't new. Bring a gun into the checkpoint, for example, you are arrested by local LEOs and charged in a state/city court.

And if TSA imposes a fine, that is administrative. If your charged for attempting to circumvent airport securty by artful concealment, that is criminal and goes to the local DA.
Seems to make the argument that there should be NO federal agency security in airports.

Security should be the responsibility of the airport authority and the airlines.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 12:44 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Seems to make the argument that there should be NO federal agency security in airports.

Security should be the responsibility of the airport authority and the airlines.
If you think so
SATTSO is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 12:47 pm
  #66  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Originally Posted by SATTSO
This isn't new. Bring a gun into the checkpoint, for example, you are arrested by local LEOs and charged in a state/city court.

And if TSA imposes a fine, that is administrative. If your charged for attempting to circumvent airport securty by artful concealment, that is criminal and goes to the local DA.
um yeah, apparently that's not always the case. Ala Alvin Crabtree. He willfully did it, others not so much, any lawyer worth there salt would use the crabtree incident to have there clients charges dismissed based on grounds of overzealous prosecution.
Scubatooth is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 12:51 pm
  #67  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,990
Originally Posted by SATTSO
If you think so
I do think so.

There was no reason to federalize airport security after 9/11.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 12:59 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I do think so.

There was no reason to federalize airport security after 9/11.
I happen to disagree.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 1:07 pm
  #69  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,990
Originally Posted by SATTSO
I happen to disagree.
I had no doubt you would.

edit to add: Look what federalizing airport security has gotten us.

A bureaucracy that is extremely top heavy, too expensive and has done little to improve the security that was in place on 9/10.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 1:13 pm
  #70  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Originally Posted by SATTSO
I happen to disagree.
yeah considering your paycheck depends on it.

The only thing TSA has added to security since then is Hassles, headaches, harassment, and perversion. The airlines did more with strengthening the cockpit doors and crews not being passive then all the TSA Bravo Sierra ever will.
Scubatooth is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 1:42 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I had no doubt you would.

edit to add: Look what federalizing airport security has gotten us.

A bureaucracy that is extremely top heavy, too expensive and has done little to improve the security that was in place on 9/10.
In your opinion.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 1:43 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
Originally Posted by TSO1973
Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by TSO1973
Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by TSO1973
Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by TSO1973
Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by TSO1973
Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by TSO1973
Plus something like this is artful concealment which brings a new element into the mix.
What is "brought into the mix" by artful concealment?
Artful concealment gets a LEO involved.
Is artful concealment unlawful?
Direct quote from a LEO, "We get involved in artful concealment situations because it shows intent to get an item past the checkpoint into the sterile area. Whether we pursue charges or citations is on a case by case basis after interviewing the passenger".
You didn't answer my question. Is artful concealment unlawful?
Well since I am not a LEO or a lawyer, that's not for me to answer. I gave you the answer I was given.
Oh, okay. New question: Do you think artful concealment is unlawful?
Whether I think it's illegal or not is irrelevant. If the SOP says I need to do something, then that's what I do.
What you think about this is relevant to this conversation. I'm only asking for your opinion. Will you please share it with us?
Depends on the situation. Artful concealment in and of itself I don't have an issue with. [...] I don't have a problem with [someone walking down the street with a knife hidden in his belt buckle]. If, however, you are artfully concealing something in a deliberate attempt to get around security measures, if it's not illegal where you are doing it, it certainly should be.
I didn't ask you what actions you find to be problematic or what actions you think should be illegal.

Do you think artful concealment by someone as he attempts to cross your TSA barricade at the airport where you work -- an action like that to which you earlier referred as "something like this" -- is unlawful?
pmocek is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 1:49 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
yeah considering your paycheck depends on it.

The only thing TSA has added to security since then is Hassles, headaches, harassment, and perversion. The airlines did more with strengthening the cockpit doors and crews not being passive then all the TSA Bravo Sierra ever will.
Really? That's the best you can do? My paycheck? I felt this way before I worked at TSA.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 1:55 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: TSO, AS MVP, AOPA member, Private Pilot ASEL
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by pmocek
I didn't ask you what actions you find to be problematic or what actions you think should be illegal.

Do you think artful concealment by someone as he attempts to cross your TSA barricade at the airport where you work -- an action like that to which you earlier referred as "something like this" -- is unlawful?
You asked whether or not I thought that artful concealment was illegal, I answered that question. Sorry if that's not the answer you are fishing for.
TSO1973 is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 1:57 pm
  #75  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,990
Originally Posted by SATTSO
In your opinion.
Mine and the GAO's.

edit to add:

GAO: TSA is yet to conduct risk assessments for U.S. transportation systems
Published 23 June 2010


http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/...tation-systems

Last edited by Boggie Dog; Jun 28, 2010 at 2:26 pm
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.