LAX security x-rays a cast, options?
#31
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Programs: Vanishing
Posts: 1,681
Assuming California is ahead of the curve, which they usually are on such things, this is likely true there as well. Next, in each of these states, one is not allowed to operate an x-ray machine for the purpose of x-raying humans unless a written directive (prescription) has been provided by a licensed physician. Second, the operator of such machines must be trained, usually meaning holding at least an Associate degree and unless under direct supervision, holding a certificate in diagnostic or therapeutic radiology (AART). Further, at least in states I'm familiar with, each operator may not use them until they are registered and a detailed Radiation Safety Plan is in place, with a designated Radiation Safety Officer.
#32
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: SSSSS
Posts: 867
THANK YOU FOR THE INFORMATION!!
First, being that I had already done this a few weeks before, I asked for a swab since that is how the other airports handle it. It would not be allowed since they have the cast machine.
Second, when she said that it could only xray the cast, I showed her the bones in my hand and asked why it was peneterating that deep. For the parts of my arm that weren't covered by the cast you could DEFINITELY see the individual bones in my hand.
If someone was concerned about something being inside the fiberglass cast, there are parts of the cast that are more than 1/2 inch deep so the machine would not detect it? Also, I go through the metal detector with no beep. What more could I be hiding in a cast 7 inches long that someone couldn't hide in their pants pocket? It seemed to be one of those situations that if I wanted to get on the plane, I have to do the 4 x-rays.
Thanks again for all the responses. I will be following up with the recommendations you had. It seems the only safe solution is to get the cast off before the next LAX flight or change to a different airport.
First, being that I had already done this a few weeks before, I asked for a swab since that is how the other airports handle it. It would not be allowed since they have the cast machine.
Second, when she said that it could only xray the cast, I showed her the bones in my hand and asked why it was peneterating that deep. For the parts of my arm that weren't covered by the cast you could DEFINITELY see the individual bones in my hand.
If someone was concerned about something being inside the fiberglass cast, there are parts of the cast that are more than 1/2 inch deep so the machine would not detect it? Also, I go through the metal detector with no beep. What more could I be hiding in a cast 7 inches long that someone couldn't hide in their pants pocket? It seemed to be one of those situations that if I wanted to get on the plane, I have to do the 4 x-rays.
Thanks again for all the responses. I will be following up with the recommendations you had. It seems the only safe solution is to get the cast off before the next LAX flight or change to a different airport.
#33
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4
TSA told me that Cast Scope is NOT optional
This was from their public affairs office.
I also asked them if I refuse Cast Scope, can they require me to complete the scanning, in much the way they can require you to complete scanning if you decide you don't want them to touch your "junk" midway through the procedure. They did not seem to know but confirmed that Cast Scope is NOT optional.
Cast Scope according to TSA's website requires 4 images to be taken, Popular Mechanics reports it's 10 on average if you *don't* have a mechanical knee --more if you do (yikes).
I asked TSA's public affairs if I felt the number of xrays they were taking was excessive (say more than 10 when I their website says four) could I stop the screening and exit the airport. They did not know the answer to that.
They are using these machines on 6 year old kids (or at least their website says they are "safe" on anyone over age 5.
I also asked them if I refuse Cast Scope, can they require me to complete the scanning, in much the way they can require you to complete scanning if you decide you don't want them to touch your "junk" midway through the procedure. They did not seem to know but confirmed that Cast Scope is NOT optional.
Cast Scope according to TSA's website requires 4 images to be taken, Popular Mechanics reports it's 10 on average if you *don't* have a mechanical knee --more if you do (yikes).
I asked TSA's public affairs if I felt the number of xrays they were taking was excessive (say more than 10 when I their website says four) could I stop the screening and exit the airport. They did not know the answer to that.
They are using these machines on 6 year old kids (or at least their website says they are "safe" on anyone over age 5.
#34
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
This was from their public affairs office.
I also asked them if I refuse Cast Scope, can they require me to complete the scanning, in much the way they can require you to complete scanning if you decide you don't want them to touch your "junk" midway through the procedure. They did not seem to know but confirmed that Cast Scope is NOT optional.
Cast Scope according to TSA's website requires 4 images to be taken, Popular Mechanics reports it's 10 on average if you *don't* have a mechanical knee --more if you do (yikes).
I asked TSA's public affairs if I felt the number of xrays they were taking was excessive (say more than 10 when I their website says four) could I stop the screening and exit the airport. They did not know the answer to that.
They are using these machines on 6 year old kids (or at least their website says they are "safe" on anyone over age 5.
I also asked them if I refuse Cast Scope, can they require me to complete the scanning, in much the way they can require you to complete scanning if you decide you don't want them to touch your "junk" midway through the procedure. They did not seem to know but confirmed that Cast Scope is NOT optional.
Cast Scope according to TSA's website requires 4 images to be taken, Popular Mechanics reports it's 10 on average if you *don't* have a mechanical knee --more if you do (yikes).
I asked TSA's public affairs if I felt the number of xrays they were taking was excessive (say more than 10 when I their website says four) could I stop the screening and exit the airport. They did not know the answer to that.
They are using these machines on 6 year old kids (or at least their website says they are "safe" on anyone over age 5.
#35



Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rio Rancho, NM - USA
Programs: DL, UA, WN, Amtrak, Hyatt, Accor
Posts: 1,795
http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/castscope.shtm
... CastScope deployment to airports will be based on the airports proximity to military hospitals or large rehabilitation facilities that serve amputees, sports events for disability groups, vacation destinations utilized by amputees and in airports that see large volumes of military severely injured.
The airports selected for the technology are San Antonio, Denver, Minneapolis, Atlanta, Washington-Dulles, Reagan National, Orlando, John. F. Kennedy, Los Angeles, Baltimore-Washington, and Phoenix. Among them they will receive 34 CastScope machines.
... CastScope deployment to airports will be based on the airports proximity to military hospitals or large rehabilitation facilities that serve amputees, sports events for disability groups, vacation destinations utilized by amputees and in airports that see large volumes of military severely injured.
The airports selected for the technology are San Antonio, Denver, Minneapolis, Atlanta, Washington-Dulles, Reagan National, Orlando, John. F. Kennedy, Los Angeles, Baltimore-Washington, and Phoenix. Among them they will receive 34 CastScope machines.
These military members, with casts, braces, bandaged areas where their arms and legs used to be, etc. have no doubt already been x-rayed too many times in the course of their diagnosis and treatments. Now they're going to airports where untrained, uncertified people will be exposing them to x-ray machines that have no maintenance schedules????
Where is the press, why aren't they leaping all over this story? The VFW and other veterans' organizations should be all over this! Where, exactly, does this fit in with TSA's own "Military Severely Injured Program?" There is a whole page on TSA's website about assuring respect and dignity for injured military. This is how the injured are respected - by forcing them to submit to x-rays at airports?
#36


Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL MM Gold
Posts: 1,688
So the message to the bad guys is: Make sure you pack your fake cast with 2 pounds of PETN because you will be forced to go through the Cast Scan and therefore get a free pass past the ETD swabber that would detect it. You could drive a 787 through the loopholes in this policy.
#37
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 12,676
I am not often left speechless and totally flabbergasted, but this information makes my blood boil. These x-ray machines are making specific targets of severely injured military members, most of whom owe their injuries to serving our nation. It makes me want to tear my hair out.
Last edited by RatherBeOnATrain; Dec 18, 2010 at 9:02 am Reason: corrected typos
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
We've Got To Go After This Machine As Aggressively As The NoSs
Unfortunately I have a broken arm. The two times I flew out of LAX (not OGG, LAS, SNA, etc) they had to x-ray the cast. They take 4 "pictures" to view all sides of the cast. The x-ray is strong enough to see the bones. I asked the TSA agent why only LAX, she said that any airport that has the machine has to use it. I asked her how safe it was, she said it can only x-ray the cast. When I showed her the bones in the x-ray, she just smiled. How can I find out if this is dangerous and if I have the right to ask for a swab (as in the other airports) instead of the x-ray? I know this isn't a common question but when you never know when you too could trip over luggage on a German train and break your arm. Thanks for any information.
#39




Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
greentips - Kudos for being an actually informed radiologist willing to comment. (Also, for using the term "/dev/null".)
OP - Tell all medical/radiology regulatory agencies, like greentips said. It's a serious population health violation.
OP - Tell all medical/radiology regulatory agencies, like greentips said. It's a serious population health violation.
#40
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4
"Re-examination of the CastScope X-ray procedure. The ACA has concerns about the amount of radiation to which people are exposed. TSA will increase the frequency of their training and will develop user-friendly information about its safety. TSA and the ACA will partner in disseminating information about this procedure."
http://www.amputee-coalition.org/abs...sp?a=1244&z=34
#41
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
I'm reasonably certain that scrotal tissue doesn't provide more than 1/4" protection for the testes...
#42
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
Unfortunately I have a broken arm. The two times I flew out of LAX (not OGG, LAS, SNA, etc) they had to x-ray the cast. They take 4 "pictures" to view all sides of the cast. The x-ray is strong enough to see the bones. I asked the TSA agent why only LAX, she said that any airport that has the machine has to use it. I asked her how safe it was, she said it can only x-ray the cast. When I showed her the bones in the x-ray, she just smiled. How can I find out if this is dangerous and if I have the right to ask for a swab (as in the other airports) instead of the x-ray? I know this isn't a common question but when you never know when you too could trip over luggage on a German train and break your arm. Thanks for any information.
#43
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
#44
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 100
A must read on backscatter x-rays...
http://n.pr/bKGCKx
Quote:
"The X-ray dose from these devices has often been compared in the media to the cosmic ray exposure inherent to airplane travel or that of a chest X-ray. However, this comparison is very misleading: both the air travel cosmic ray exposure and chest Xrays have much higher X-ray energies and the health consequences are appropriately understood in terms of the whole body volume dose. In contrast, these new airport scanners are largely depositing their energy into the skin and immediately adjacent tissue, and since this is such a small fraction of body weight/vol, possibly by one to two orders of magnitude, the real dose to the skin is now high."
Exactly why shouldn't we be just as concerned about backscatter x-ray technology as these U/C faculty seem to be?
http://n.pr/bKGCKx
Quote:
"The X-ray dose from these devices has often been compared in the media to the cosmic ray exposure inherent to airplane travel or that of a chest X-ray. However, this comparison is very misleading: both the air travel cosmic ray exposure and chest Xrays have much higher X-ray energies and the health consequences are appropriately understood in terms of the whole body volume dose. In contrast, these new airport scanners are largely depositing their energy into the skin and immediately adjacent tissue, and since this is such a small fraction of body weight/vol, possibly by one to two orders of magnitude, the real dose to the skin is now high."
Exactly why shouldn't we be just as concerned about backscatter x-ray technology as these U/C faculty seem to be?

