Bosom Bombers
Feb 4, 2010 | 5:43 am
#1
Original Poster
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,725
Bosom Bombers
Caveat Lector.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123758
First we have bombs in bras, now we have bombs in implants. So much for the Nude-O-Scope.
The scary part is now the leches and perverts who man the airports checkpoint have a "valid" excuse for wand rape and inappropriate contact. Expect lots of women facing charges when they deck a TSO for copping a feel.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123758
First we have bombs in bras, now we have bombs in implants. So much for the Nude-O-Scope.
The scary part is now the leches and perverts who man the airports checkpoint have a "valid" excuse for wand rape and inappropriate contact. Expect lots of women facing charges when they deck a TSO for copping a feel.
Feb 4, 2010 | 5:55 am
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Caveat Lector.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123758
First we have bombs in bras, now we have bombs in implants. So much for the Nude-O-Scope.
The scary part is now the leches and perverts who man the airports checkpoint have a "valid" excuse for wand rape and inappropriate contact. Expect lots of women facing charges when they deck a TSO for copping a feel.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123758
First we have bombs in bras, now we have bombs in implants. So much for the Nude-O-Scope.
The scary part is now the leches and perverts who man the airports checkpoint have a "valid" excuse for wand rape and inappropriate contact. Expect lots of women facing charges when they deck a TSO for copping a feel.
Feb 4, 2010 | 8:23 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
Not really news -- and a garbage source at that trying to get in on the growing disappointment with what is called airport "security" in order to push another filthy agenda -- but it still goes to highlight that the strip search machines are ineffective because they do not detect explosives.
Feb 4, 2010 | 8:50 am
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
As the strip search machines don't detect explosives, they were as good as magic junk from first manufactured unit to-date -- that's despite their favorite Chertoff's claims and regardless of what terrorists were/were not/are/are not looking to introduce.
[Most of that "chatter" and other "information" picked up or used by British intelligence and security services is pretty much useless and probably nothing but innocent people -- in countries near and/or far -- mocking or considering the ineffectiveness in strip search machines being used to try to detect explosives.]
Obsoleted junk indeed. Unfortunately it's obsolete junk that is still being bought.
Feb 4, 2010 | 9:02 am
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
Exactly.
As the strip search machines don't detect explosives, they were as good as magic junk from first manufactured unit to-date -- that's despite their favorite Chertoff's claims and regardless of what terrorists were/were not/are/are not looking to introduce.
[Most of that "chatter" and other "information" picked up or used by British intelligence and security services is pretty much useless and probably nothing but innocent people -- in countries near and/or far -- mocking or considering the ineffectiveness in strip search machines being used to try to detect explosives.]
Obsoleted junk indeed. Unfortunately it's obsolete junk that is still being bought.
As the strip search machines don't detect explosives, they were as good as magic junk from first manufactured unit to-date -- that's despite their favorite Chertoff's claims and regardless of what terrorists were/were not/are/are not looking to introduce.
[Most of that "chatter" and other "information" picked up or used by British intelligence and security services is pretty much useless and probably nothing but innocent people -- in countries near and/or far -- mocking or considering the ineffectiveness in strip search machines being used to try to detect explosives.]
Obsoleted junk indeed. Unfortunately it's obsolete junk that is still being bought.
Explosive Trave Portals seem the best answer although even then if the item is in the body would anything short of xray be effective.
Feb 4, 2010 | 10:51 am
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
No detonation is necessary to get the governments of the world to go crazy.
Making it look like an attempted detonation of a dud would seem to be more effective for the terrorists than an actual in-flight detonation of explosives that took out the plane.
Look at the government's reaction to failed bombings and imaginary plotted bombings involving airlines since December 2001. Things are more crazy after these nutty situations than they were right after terrorists actually destroyed civilian passenger planes flying an OECD country flag.
Making it look like an attempted detonation of a dud would seem to be more effective for the terrorists than an actual in-flight detonation of explosives that took out the plane.
Look at the government's reaction to failed bombings and imaginary plotted bombings involving airlines since December 2001. Things are more crazy after these nutty situations than they were right after terrorists actually destroyed civilian passenger planes flying an OECD country flag.
Feb 4, 2010 | 11:25 am
#14
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
No detonation is necessary to get the governments of the world to go crazy.
Making it look like an attempted detonation of a dud would seem to be more effective for the terrorists than an actual in-flight detonation of explosives that took out the plane.
Look at the government's reaction to failed bombings and imaginary plotted bombings involving airlines since December 2001. Things are more crazy after these nutty situations than they were right after terrorists actually destroyed civilian passenger planes flying an OECD country flag.
Making it look like an attempted detonation of a dud would seem to be more effective for the terrorists than an actual in-flight detonation of explosives that took out the plane.
Look at the government's reaction to failed bombings and imaginary plotted bombings involving airlines since December 2001. Things are more crazy after these nutty situations than they were right after terrorists actually destroyed civilian passenger planes flying an OECD country flag.
If a failed bra bomber is caught, only flat chested women will fly unmolested by TSA...
Feb 4, 2010 | 12:45 pm
#15
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 508
Or they get a kidney removed, and use that area for explosives.
But indeed having someone fail would cause greater havoc.
TSA might as well start working on the propaganda that full body X-rays up to 100 times a year are perfectly safe.
But indeed having someone fail would cause greater havoc.
TSA might as well start working on the propaganda that full body X-rays up to 100 times a year are perfectly safe.