Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SCL - US Bound Flight "Security"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 4:14 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,655
SCL - US Bound Flight "Security"

I've been down to SCL twice recently. Once last week, and once at the beginning of last December. Their version of the imposed US security stupidity is laughable, and speaks volumes of what they think about it.

Regular security goes pretty quick (although the Immigration lines can be a small wait). No barkers, no shoe removal, no laptop removal, no liquid removal. Very pleasant, actually.

Pre-underwear bomber, there has always been a gate check for liquids for US-bound flights. It was always a cursory glance in your bag that took a few seconds and you were on your way.

Post-underwear bomber, it really hasn't changed. A quick look was given to the top layer of my carry on and backpack. If I had buried anything, they never would have found it. In the jetway, they had a male and female screener doing patdowns. This was by far the most cursory patdown I've ever experienced. Just a quick pat on my outer torso by my arms, and another on my outer knees. Then onto the plane.

It's clear that the Chilean government is just "going through the motions" imposed upon them by the US, not really liking what the demands are. All for show. Love it.
SNA_Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 7:25 pm
  #2  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YVR
Programs: AC 75K
Posts: 828
Thumbs up to SCL security for calling this spade a spade. Their actions provide exactly 0% less security than the hysterical efforts of TSA and CATSA.
Air Koryo is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 8:04 pm
  #3  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
It is the same in many places around the world (unfortunately not all) for flights to USA.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 8:35 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cincinnati CVG
Posts: 284
I would never expect other countries to spend the money and resources to mimic our security. For one it's is pointless and with the exception of Britain we are the only country targeted by the would be bad guys.
Sean5294 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 3:17 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PEK
Programs: UA Premier Silver, SPG Gold
Posts: 128
Originally Posted by Sean5294
I would never expect other countries to spend the money and resources to mimic our security. For one it's is pointless and with the exception of Britain we are the only country targeted by the would be bad guys.
That's a bit of a stretch. What about Spain, Morocco, Indonesia, Singapore, the Philippines, Argentina... the list goes on. I agree that we are the main target, but we are not alone.
ORDinaryPax is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 3:30 pm
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by SNA_Flyer
I've been down to SCL twice recently. Once last week, and once at the beginning of last December. Their version of the imposed US security stupidity is laughable, and speaks volumes of what they think about it.

Regular security goes pretty quick (although the Immigration lines can be a small wait). No barkers, no shoe removal, no laptop removal, no liquid removal. Very pleasant, actually.

Pre-underwear bomber, there has always been a gate check for liquids for US-bound flights. It was always a cursory glance in your bag that took a few seconds and you were on your way.

Post-underwear bomber, it really hasn't changed. A quick look was given to the top layer of my carry on and backpack. If I had buried anything, they never would have found it. In the jetway, they had a male and female screener doing patdowns. This was by far the most cursory patdown I've ever experienced. Just a quick pat on my outer torso by my arms, and another on my outer knees. Then onto the plane.

It's clear that the Chilean government is just "going through the motions" imposed upon them by the US, not really liking what the demands are. All for show. Love it.
A lot of Latin American governments and retained contractors have pretty much been doing the same thing as what happens in SCL when it comes to flights bound to the US. I'm now starting to see some of the same happen in Europe too, but there it's not a function of governments telling the TSA to take a hike.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 3:33 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AA,DL,BA,UA,SPG, and any other free trip!
Posts: 1,803
the Chilean govt did the right thing....we wouldn't have issues like the underwear bomber if we werent so arrogant and causing problems all over the world. Go to the root of the problem and solve it...not nip every weed that pops up on your green lawn.
mrx900 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.