FlyerTalk Forums
Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Another poorly redacted SSI document. (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/1034046-another-poorly-redacted-ssi-document.html)

Trollkiller Dec 31, 2009 7:26 pm
Another poorly redacted SSI document.
 
http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdo...cation=ACROBAT

I thought they fixed that problem.

Special thanks to Cryptome.

http://cryptome.org/0001/tsa-ssi-02.htm

I am still reading it so I don't know if there is anything juicy yet.

bdschobel Dec 31, 2009 7:31 pm
Wonderful! I so much enjoy watching idiots trying to keep secrets that shouldn't be secret in the first place -- and are "secret" only because the same idiots said they are! What irony.

Bruce

AngryMiller Dec 31, 2009 7:32 pm
Originally Posted by Trollkiller (Post 13089460)
http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdo...cation=ACROBAT

I thought they fixed that problem.

Special thanks to Cryptome.

http://cryptome.org/0001/tsa-ssi-02.htm

I am still reading it so I don't know if there is anything juicy yet.
Snicker, giggle, snort, ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha,

Referring to DHS/TSA upper level management as the Keystone Cops would be an insult to the Keystone Cops. Got to hand it to them though, they do provide a bit of drama, comedy, etc.

senseker Dec 31, 2009 7:33 pm
What boring documents.

Trollkiller Dec 31, 2009 7:35 pm
I am starting to feel sorry for Gale, her whole foundation is starting to crumble and she will be the one that fall furthest.

Interesting tidbit

This figure was based on the appellant’s assertion that the manufacturer claimed machines could detect 1 part per billion of explosive residue in a sample but that in covert testing a 2 percent (or two parts per hundred) residue was often not detected. AF, Tab 1, Exh. 1 (September 28, 2007 letters to various officials).

Trollkiller Dec 31, 2009 7:37 pm
Originally Posted by senseker (Post 13089485)
What boring documents.
I know, I expect SSI to be really SENSITIVE Security Information.

BYW you need to contact your superiors per the law on SSI. I have already screwed up one of Blogger Bob's weekends.

AngryMiller Dec 31, 2009 7:41 pm
Originally Posted by Trollkiller (Post 13089500)
I know, I expect SSI to be really SENSITIVE Security Information.

BYW you need to contact your superiors per the law on SSI. I have already screwed up one of Blogger Bob's weekends.
I suspect that they have a person assigned to read FT security posts over the weekend and the call has already gone out.

senseker Dec 31, 2009 7:44 pm
Originally Posted by Trollkiller (Post 13089500)
I know, I expect SSI to be really SENSITIVE Security Information.

BYW you need to contact your superiors per the law on SSI. I have already screwed up one of Blogger Bob's weekends.
Well, I would never post ssi here or anywhere. I'm not about to lose my job.

:p

KNRG Dec 31, 2009 7:47 pm
Originally Posted by Trollkiller (Post 13089491)
Interesting tidbit
I made the assertions that those machines didn't work in another thread.. I didn't know the specifics but I knew they weren't happy with them, even the dumbest government entity wouldn't employ dozens of them at one airport (TPA) and then suddenly shut them all off and cart them away if there wasn't something seriously wrong with them.

bdschobel Dec 31, 2009 7:48 pm
Originally Posted by senseker (Post 13089519)
Well, I would never post ssi here or anywhere. I'm not about to lose my job.

:p
I suppose no matter how terrible the job, somebody somewhere values it! :(

Bruce

senseker Dec 31, 2009 7:52 pm
Originally Posted by bdschobel (Post 13089533)
I suppose no matter how terrible the job, somebody somewhere values it! :(

Bruce
It isn't that bad. Yea, it gets annoying at times, but I have fun. Besides, i'm not an ... towards passengers, so sometimes it's nice when they tell me how nice it is to meet a non-mean tso. However, not everyone can be pleased, no matter how wrong they are.

Trollkiller Dec 31, 2009 8:09 pm
BTW I have the documents posted on my blog in case the original gets yanked.

I alerted Blogger Bob so I wonder how the TSA will play it this time around. I am expecting a much cooler response.

Boggie Dog Dec 31, 2009 9:17 pm
Originally Posted by Trollkiller (Post 13089491)
I am starting to feel sorry for Gale, her whole foundation is starting to crumble and she will be the one that fall furthest.

Interesting tidbit
Never feel sorry for appointees. They did nothing to earn the position they hold.

Boggie Dog Dec 31, 2009 9:18 pm
Originally Posted by Trollkiller (Post 13089590)
BTW I have the documents posted on my blog in case the original gets yanked.

I alerted Blogger Bob so I wonder how the TSA will play it this time around. I am expecting a much cooler response.
You remind me of the little boy with a magnifying glass zapping ants.

Trollkiller Dec 31, 2009 10:09 pm
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 13089794)
You remind me of the little boy with a magnifying glass zapping ants.
I think that is a pretty accurate description, but those ants deserved to die.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:42 am.
Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.