Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Post Office Flight Safety

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 2:27 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 637
Post Office Flight Safety

I tried to send my m-i-l a box of chocolates for Thanksgiving, but made the mistake of putting actual stamps on the package and leaving it for my carrier to pick up from my home via a note in the mailbox.

He took the package, but it was brought back to me two days later by a different postal employee who brought it to my door, rang the bell, and handed it to me with a sticker on it that said that packages over 13 ounces must be handed to a postal employee at the counter or they can not be placed on a plane -- because they don't know who I am. (Despite ringing my bell and having me answer my door,... )

Never fear -- Mr. Lupine was able to take the package into the post office near his office and hand it in over the counter -- no id required -- and don't we all feel safer now?

I'm not sure what seems more absurd: the notion that an anonymous person handing a package over the counter adds to flight security more than the local carrier picking the package up from a customer on his everyday route, or the strange logic that sends packages over 13 ounces (weird number) to special handling when the bulk of people killed through stuff sent via the mail were killed with anthrax poisoned mail that weighed under an ounce.
lupine is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 2:33 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,985
Not directly related to your situation but I was reading an article about "Trusted Shippers" who can have truck traffic from Mexico into the US expedited. The problem is that the drug dealers are placing their drugs on these trucks.

TSA has trusted shippers for cargo that is loaded onto aircraft.

Emm.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 2:36 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by lupine
I tried to send my m-i-l a box of chocolates for Thanksgiving, but made the mistake of putting actual stamps on the package and leaving it for my carrier to pick up from my home via a note in the mailbox.

He took the package, but it was brought back to me two days later by a different postal employee who brought it to my door, rang the bell, and handed it to me with a sticker on it that said that packages over 13 ounces must be handed to a postal employee at the counter or they can not be placed on a plane -- because they don't know who I am. (Despite ringing my bell and having me answer my door,... )

Never fear -- Mr. Lupine was able to take the package into the post office near his office and hand it in over the counter -- no id required -- and don't we all feel safer now?

I'm not sure what seems more absurd: the notion that an anonymous person handing a package over the counter adds to flight security more than the local carrier picking the package up from a customer on his everyday route, or the strange logic that sends packages over 13 ounces (weird number) to special handling when the bulk of people killed through stuff sent via the mail were killed with anthrax poisoned mail that weighed under an ounce.
The added security of handing it to an employee is they have video of the person sending the package. Won't stop a bomb or anthrax but it will help find the culprit after.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 2:53 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 637
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
The added security of handing it to an employee is they have video of the person sending the package. Won't stop a bomb or anthrax but it will help find the culprit after.
I still think they're not clear on the concept: after-the-explosion video of who anonymously dropped the package off at the post office may help the FBI find the perpetrator, but it doesn't do diddly-poop to actually protect the passengers and the plane. A carrier taking a package from a known customer seems to be inherently a stronger level of security.

And video of bundled up people in queue at the post office in frigid weather isn't likely to be any too helpful anyway.
lupine is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 3:18 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by lupine
I still think they're not clear on the concept: after-the-explosion video of who anonymously dropped the package off at the post office may help the FBI find the perpetrator, but it doesn't do diddly-poop to actually protect the passengers and the plane. A carrier taking a package from a known customer seems to be inherently a stronger level of security.

And video of bundled up people in queue at the post office in frigid weather isn't likely to be any too helpful anyway.
Did the original carrier take it from your hand or did you leave it on the porch?

If they took it from your hand I agree that is a bit more secure unless you move and nobody has video of your face.

What happened is your carrier broke the rules by taking the package from you. Most likely they got chewed pretty good so be sure to leave them a nice Christmas tip.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 3:23 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
60 Nights
50 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott, IHG, Hyatt something
Posts: 34,516
Seems dumb that you couldn't have just handed it back to the employee bringing it to you.

I have an account where I print out US Mail labels all the time, and just leave them in my mailbox. I guess this gets around the stamp requirement.
Jaimito Cartero is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 3:30 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
1. Our local P.O. does not have a video camera; I have also handed packages directly to the mail carrier and have never had anything returned.

2. I also mail packages directly from work and have never had anything returned. Business mail goes out in bins and the P.O. doesn't have a clue as to who is mailing the package.
doober is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 10:51 pm
  #8  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL MM Gold
Posts: 1,688
Originally Posted by Jaimito Cartero
I have an account where I print out US Mail labels all the time, and just leave them in my mailbox. I guess this gets around the stamp requirement.
You're traceable by the credit card used to buy the postage. So they say. Bad guys would never go to the trouble to set up an account. Never.
TheRoadie is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 10:53 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
If they took it from your hand I agree that is a bit more secure unless you move and nobody has video of your face.
However, that's purely reactionary. That video wouldn't be looked up unless something went kaboom.

There IS a big hole in this medium (something that's been discussed several times on this board in the past). Having someone at the Post Office ask if there's anything "liquid, fragile or perishable" doesn't seem like an effective way to secure cargo.


Originally Posted by TheRoadie
You're traceable by the credit card used to buy the postage. So they say. Bad guys would never go to the trouble to set up an account. Never.
I didn't see where the OP said he/she bought the stamps with a credit card. It also reads to me the postage was self-administered, bot via someone at the PO.

I am not aware of any serial numbers on stamps, anyway (the ones you stick on yourself, I mean).
LessO2 is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 11:50 am
  #10  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,678
Originally Posted by LessO2
I didn't see where the OP said he/she bought the stamps with a credit card. It also reads to me the postage was self-administered, bot via someone at the PO.

I am not aware of any serial numbers on stamps, anyway (the ones you stick on yourself, I mean).
He was making the point that any mail that has postage paid by meter or postage paid online is not subject to the rule since you know who applied the postage. The rule only applies to stamps.

When he pays online, he can leave the package wherever.
Ari is online now  
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 9:02 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
You're traceable by the credit card used to buy the postage. So they say.
And no criminal would ever use a stolen credit card number. Oh, no, certainly not. Nothing to see here. Anyone who uses a credit card is clearly an upstanding right-thinking citizen.
daw617 is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 10:08 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GEG
Programs: Motel 6 Club Avoir Le Cafard
Posts: 5,027
Of course you could subscribe to stamps.com or purchase a Dymo label printer, and mail anything of any weight from anywhere.
mbstone is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 1:20 pm
  #13  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MIA
Programs: PC Plat/Amb
Posts: 1,152
Originally Posted by daw617
And no criminal would ever use a stolen credit card number. Oh, no, certainly not. Nothing to see here. Anyone who uses a credit card is clearly an upstanding right-thinking citizen.
Not that you can go to a Jiffy-Mart and buy a prepaid credit card that is untraceable, either.
We Will Never Forget is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 11:48 am
  #14  
500k
30 Countries Visited
60 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: AA Plat Pto, IHG Plat, HH Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,593
It comes down to the accepting employee having the official "suspicious package" training. Window clerks get it, carriers do not so only one group is certified to handle the package. Stupid, very much so. It is followed stictly though, I am an administative employee of USPS and my carrier knows me well and what my position is and I still have to use the counter.
Exiled in Express is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 1:00 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
I wonder about the weight difference between TSA and the USPS. Up to 13 oz is safe without inspection (according to an organization that has delivered letter bombs) vs 3 (or is it 3.4) oz for an organization which delivers zip.
IslandBased is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.