Air China: PEK to ZRH. two pax demanding upgrade to C class due to not getting Y+
#16
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
I certainly agree with you on this point, and if I was the FA, I would have felt delighted by telling the obnoxious couple to pound sand. That having been said, if the couple had been civil, moving them to (empty) J seats seems like a win-win-win (reference to The Office) scenario: 1. happy customers; 2. no refund paperwork; 3. $200 definitely covers the increased catering costs.
#17
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
I certainly agree with you on this point, and if I was the FA, I would have felt delighted by telling the obnoxious couple to pound sand. That having been said, if the couple had been civil, moving them to (empty) J seats seems like a win-win-win (reference to The Office) scenario: 1. happy customers; 2. no refund paperwork; 3. $200 definitely covers the increased catering costs.
#20
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CAN, LAX, TPE
Programs: AA, AS, CI, DL, UA
Posts: 2,898
CA is at fault for sure for selling the couple products that they didn’t have, regardless it’s PE or Y+. CA should have told them upfront at check in and process a refund then.
While the couples behavior is not acceptable, they were clearly not as disturbing as you had described since you still got a worthwhile sleep with Y earphones. Plus, I find it perfectly acceptable to be unhappy cause they are now on the plane with a product they didn’t purchase and are stuck there.
I personally wouldn’t pay PE or Y+ on CA or CZ, but if I were in this situation I would definitely get it solved at the moment rather than going to customer service afterwards for this.
On flights where PE is not available, some airlines do upgrade the pax to C, it’s not as uncommon as you think.
While the couples behavior is not acceptable, they were clearly not as disturbing as you had described since you still got a worthwhile sleep with Y earphones. Plus, I find it perfectly acceptable to be unhappy cause they are now on the plane with a product they didn’t purchase and are stuck there.
I personally wouldn’t pay PE or Y+ on CA or CZ, but if I were in this situation I would definitely get it solved at the moment rather than going to customer service afterwards for this.
On flights where PE is not available, some airlines do upgrade the pax to C, it’s not as uncommon as you think.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,557
CA is at fault for sure for selling the couple products that they didn’t have, regardless it’s PE or Y+. CA should have told them upfront at check in and process a refund then.
While the couples behavior is not acceptable, they were clearly not as disturbing as you had described since you still got a worthwhile sleep with Y earphones. Plus, I find it perfectly acceptable to be unhappy cause they are now on the plane with a product they didn’t purchase and are stuck there.
I personally wouldn’t pay PE or Y+ on CA or CZ, but if I were in this situation I would definitely get it solved at the moment rather than going to customer service afterwards for this.
On flights where PE is not available, some airlines do upgrade the pax to C, it’s not as uncommon as you think.
While the couples behavior is not acceptable, they were clearly not as disturbing as you had described since you still got a worthwhile sleep with Y earphones. Plus, I find it perfectly acceptable to be unhappy cause they are now on the plane with a product they didn’t purchase and are stuck there.
I personally wouldn’t pay PE or Y+ on CA or CZ, but if I were in this situation I would definitely get it solved at the moment rather than going to customer service afterwards for this.
On flights where PE is not available, some airlines do upgrade the pax to C, it’s not as uncommon as you think.
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
#23
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SIN (with a bit of ZRH sprinkled in)
Posts: 9,455
So does CX upgrade PE (a different class that costs way more than Y+ on CA, which was sold for 100$ more than Y..) to C on a regular base, for non-status flyers? Or just when Y is full (or close to full, and even sitting PE pax together might be a nightmare)? Or just randomly?
As much as I can see it, an upgrade from a proper PE product (CX, SQ, LH..) to C for a frequent flyer in case of an airline swap is QUITE some difference than basically an upgrade from a seat with a bit more seatpitch (100$ "Y+", which was "downgraded" to a bulkhead seat with plenty of space) to C.
Someone above mentioned that, would airline really offer upgrades from Y+ to C on a regular base, it could easily be gamed. I have to second this. You're basically not going to lose anything if you'd do that. Either money back (and most probably the best Y seat) or a massive upgrade. It would be rather crazy for an airline NOT stopping this from happening. I do understand that some FTers probably DID use - I won't say abuse - such methods to gain plenty of "free" C upgrades, so I can understand if some are defending such "practice".
As much as I can see it, an upgrade from a proper PE product (CX, SQ, LH..) to C for a frequent flyer in case of an airline swap is QUITE some difference than basically an upgrade from a seat with a bit more seatpitch (100$ "Y+", which was "downgraded" to a bulkhead seat with plenty of space) to C.
Someone above mentioned that, would airline really offer upgrades from Y+ to C on a regular base, it could easily be gamed. I have to second this. You're basically not going to lose anything if you'd do that. Either money back (and most probably the best Y seat) or a massive upgrade. It would be rather crazy for an airline NOT stopping this from happening. I do understand that some FTers probably DID use - I won't say abuse - such methods to gain plenty of "free" C upgrades, so I can understand if some are defending such "practice".
#24
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
How is CA owning 30% of CX relevant? AA has invested in CZ. Does that mean AA policies come into play? Should you expect planes to go out with no empty seats in front?
The power dynamic on the plane in China is different than in the US. The FA's aren't overbearing, and they put up with a whole lot more than in the US. But I'm also happy in this case they didn't just cave to these obnoxious self-entitled Americans.
The power dynamic on the plane in China is different than in the US. The FA's aren't overbearing, and they put up with a whole lot more than in the US. But I'm also happy in this case they didn't just cave to these obnoxious self-entitled Americans.
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
So does CX upgrade PE (a different class that costs way more than Y+ on CA, which was sold for 100$ more than Y..) to C on a regular base, for non-status flyers? Or just when Y is full (or close to full, and even sitting PE pax together might be a nightmare)? Or just randomly?
As much as I can see it, an upgrade from a proper PE product (CX, SQ, LH..) to C for a frequent flyer in case of an airline swap is QUITE some difference than basically an upgrade from a seat with a bit more seatpitch (100$ "Y+", which was "downgraded" to a bulkhead seat with plenty of space) to C.
Someone above mentioned that, would airline really offer upgrades from Y+ to C on a regular base, it could easily be gamed. I have to second this. You're basically not going to lose anything if you'd do that. Either money back (and most probably the best Y seat) or a massive upgrade. It would be rather crazy for an airline NOT stopping this from happening. I do understand that some FTers probably DID use - I won't say abuse - such methods to gain plenty of "free" C upgrades, so I can understand if some are defending such "practice".
As much as I can see it, an upgrade from a proper PE product (CX, SQ, LH..) to C for a frequent flyer in case of an airline swap is QUITE some difference than basically an upgrade from a seat with a bit more seatpitch (100$ "Y+", which was "downgraded" to a bulkhead seat with plenty of space) to C.
Someone above mentioned that, would airline really offer upgrades from Y+ to C on a regular base, it could easily be gamed. I have to second this. You're basically not going to lose anything if you'd do that. Either money back (and most probably the best Y seat) or a massive upgrade. It would be rather crazy for an airline NOT stopping this from happening. I do understand that some FTers probably DID use - I won't say abuse - such methods to gain plenty of "free" C upgrades, so I can understand if some are defending such "practice".
#26
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
How is CA owning 30% of CX relevant? AA has invested in CZ. Does that mean AA policies come into play? Should you expect planes to go out with no empty seats in front?
The power dynamic on the plane in China is different than in the US. The FA's aren't overbearing, and they put up with a whole lot more than in the US. But I'm also happy in this case they didn't just cave to these obnoxious self-entitled Americans.
The power dynamic on the plane in China is different than in the US. The FA's aren't overbearing, and they put up with a whole lot more than in the US. But I'm also happy in this case they didn't just cave to these obnoxious self-entitled Americans.
#27
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,884
So does CX upgrade PE (a different class that costs way more than Y+ on CA, which was sold for 100$ more than Y..) to C on a regular base, for non-status flyers? Or just when Y is full (or close to full, and even sitting PE pax together might be a nightmare)? Or just randomly?
As much as I can see it, an upgrade from a proper PE product (CX, SQ, LH..) to C for a frequent flyer in case of an airline swap is QUITE some difference than basically an upgrade from a seat with a bit more seatpitch (100$ "Y+", which was "downgraded" to a bulkhead seat with plenty of space) to C.
Someone above mentioned that, would airline really offer upgrades from Y+ to C on a regular base, it could easily be gamed. I have to second this. You're basically not going to lose anything if you'd do that. Either money back (and most probably the best Y seat) or a massive upgrade. It would be rather crazy for an airline NOT stopping this from happening. I do understand that some FTers probably DID use - I won't say abuse - such methods to gain plenty of "free" C upgrades, so I can understand if some are defending such "practice".
As much as I can see it, an upgrade from a proper PE product (CX, SQ, LH..) to C for a frequent flyer in case of an airline swap is QUITE some difference than basically an upgrade from a seat with a bit more seatpitch (100$ "Y+", which was "downgraded" to a bulkhead seat with plenty of space) to C.
Someone above mentioned that, would airline really offer upgrades from Y+ to C on a regular base, it could easily be gamed. I have to second this. You're basically not going to lose anything if you'd do that. Either money back (and most probably the best Y seat) or a massive upgrade. It would be rather crazy for an airline NOT stopping this from happening. I do understand that some FTers probably DID use - I won't say abuse - such methods to gain plenty of "free" C upgrades, so I can understand if some are defending such "practice".
I have some sympathy for them because they may know how very hard it is to get compensation from an airline operating in China after departure. I just gave up trying to get compensation from HX where they substituted a single aisle single class A321 for an A330 when I had booked and paid for business class. Like these passengers in this story I did not find out until I boarded, at check-in they just said there was a seat change but I was still in an aisle seat. I said fine. I alerted the FA as soon as I boarded and she said tell the ground staff when you land and they will take care of it. Two agents meeting the flight said they only help with connections go ask at the baggage claim desk. After waiting in line there they gave me a phone number to call during office hours which took five tries to get someone to answer who also did not know but told me to submit an email. Ten emails later still nothing. This is why I now book with Ctrip and let them deal with such nonsense if it happens.
Nothing excuses the passengers' boorish behavior you witnessed. However Air China caused this issue and should have addressed the compensation issue on the ground before boarding. The passengers have no real choice after they have boarded which will increase the disappointment and frustration they feel.
As to your other question do other airlines upgrade passengers on a regular basis, when a booked cabin class is not available nearly all airlines will upgrade passengers into a higher class before downgrading anyone. You know this. If these two passengers really bought premium economy (and not preferred seating economy or something like that) then it is entirely reasonable to think that Air China would consider upgrading them if space is available since this is what most airlines do. It all depends on what cabin they booked which none of us here know for sure.
#28
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Upon further reflection, I believe I would have lost my temper as well. Unlike our OP, the boorish couple paid for an upgrade.
ETA: it's possible that ONLY reason the couple selected CA is because of the (promised) better seats. They either should have gotten J seats, or received $500 each in compensation.
@YuropFlyler:
On the off chance that you got their contact info, please share with me via PM, and I will message my best CA contacts. My thinking is that all of us have the potential to be .......s, but when companies piss people off, even their frontline people should try to be civil.
ETA: it's possible that ONLY reason the couple selected CA is because of the (promised) better seats. They either should have gotten J seats, or received $500 each in compensation.
@YuropFlyler:
On the off chance that you got their contact info, please share with me via PM, and I will message my best CA contacts. My thinking is that all of us have the potential to be .......s, but when companies piss people off, even their frontline people should try to be civil.
Last edited by moondog; Jun 14, 2019 at 11:44 pm
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,225
I recently paid for MU premium economy on their 787 which is a real premium economy. They switched the plane to a 330 with the jive premium economy like they have on Air China, basically an extra 3 or 4 inches of legroom in an economy seat. I wasn’t the only pax on the plane complaining to the flight attendants about the downgrade. They smiled and told us basically to pound sand. Ctrip told me the same thing when I asked for some coin back.
The Chinese airlines are pretty dishonest about calling their Y+ seating “premium economy” especially now that some newer aircraft on all of the big 3 actually do have a real premium economy. They should find a way to better differentiate it. The extra legroom seats on CA certainly don’t meet the standard expectation for what premium economy should be and I understand the frustration of the couple mentioned by the OP
The Chinese airlines are pretty dishonest about calling their Y+ seating “premium economy” especially now that some newer aircraft on all of the big 3 actually do have a real premium economy. They should find a way to better differentiate it. The extra legroom seats on CA certainly don’t meet the standard expectation for what premium economy should be and I understand the frustration of the couple mentioned by the OP
#30
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,884
I recently paid for MU premium economy on their 787 which is a real premium economy. They switched the plane to a 330 with the jive premium economy like they have on Air China, basically an extra 3 or 4 inches of legroom in an economy seat. I wasn’t the only pax on the plane complaining to the flight attendants about the downgrade. They smiled and told us basically to pound sand. Ctrip told me the same thing when I asked for some coin back.
The Chinese airlines are pretty dishonest about calling their Y+ seating “premium economy” especially now that some newer aircraft on all of the big 3 actually do have a real premium economy. They should find a way to better differentiate it. The extra legroom seats on CA certainly don’t meet the standard expectation for what premium economy should be and I understand the frustration of the couple mentioned by the OP
The Chinese airlines are pretty dishonest about calling their Y+ seating “premium economy” especially now that some newer aircraft on all of the big 3 actually do have a real premium economy. They should find a way to better differentiate it. The extra legroom seats on CA certainly don’t meet the standard expectation for what premium economy should be and I understand the frustration of the couple mentioned by the OP
I am old enough to remember the rollout of long haul business class on European Airlines. On Lufthansa in the beginning it was just another economy seat but with a much improved meal and amenities service. We all hated it. Kind of like what they do today on domestic first or business in Europe, the seats are the same as economy, they block the middle one if they can, and you get nice wine with your snack. I hate those seats from the Middle East or North Africa back to FRA or MUC. You pay business class, reserve a wide body so you sleep when boarding at 2 am, and then they switch to an A320 or A321. But, such first world problems we all suffer from.....