Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Chinese carriers to merge??? [rumor]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2015, 9:42 pm
  #1  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Chinese carriers to merge??? [rumor]

I don't have a link, but this weekend the print edition of Wall Street Journal contained a small paragraph saying that there is "speculation" that some mainland Chinese airlines will merge. They mentioned China Air and China Southern.

As these carriers are currently members of *A and SkyTeam respectively, one naturally wonders to which alliance a potential merged airline would belong. Currently SkyTeam has both MU and CZ. This gives the alliance good coverage of the growing market in mainland China.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2015, 11:11 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PVG
Programs: MU Platinum, HH Diamond
Posts: 827
Here's the link: the way I read it things are inconclusive.

Don't Get Carried Away by Air China Merger Talk

Airline merger speculation has taken flight in China, but investors should stay grounded.
Yet another possibility is that Beijing will seek to merge the parent companies of the three top airlines to create a kind of aviation holding company
YariGuy is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2015, 11:35 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
I don't have a link, but this weekend the print edition of Wall Street Journal contained a small paragraph saying that there is "speculation" that some mainland Chinese airlines will merge. They mentioned China Air and China Southern.

As these carriers are currently members of *A and SkyTeam respectively, one naturally wonders to which alliance a potential merged airline would belong. Currently SkyTeam has both MU and CZ. This gives the alliance good coverage of the growing market in mainland China.
I think you mean Air China. China Air is a carrier out of Taiwan and I don't see any mergers between those two carriers.
1kBill is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2015, 12:56 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,037
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
I don't have a link, but this weekend the print edition of Wall Street Journal contained a small paragraph saying that there is "speculation" that some mainland Chinese airlines will merge. They mentioned China Air and China Southern.

As these carriers are currently members of *A and SkyTeam respectively, one naturally wonders to which alliance a potential merged airline would belong. Currently SkyTeam has both MU and CZ. This gives the alliance good coverage of the growing market in mainland China.
.
Why would you assume they would join the same alliance? The split alliance strategy seems to work pretty well for CA and CX.
moondog is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2015, 1:03 am
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Originally Posted by moondog
.
Why would you assume they would join the same alliance? The split alliance strategy seems to work pretty well for CA and CX.
If two different carriers merge and become one, it would be difficult to combine operations but keep the FF programs separate. Look at the UA/CO and AA/US mergers as examples. In each case, the combined airline belongs to a single alliance. [DL/NW would be another example, but they belonged to the same alliance before the merger.]
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2015, 1:04 am
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Originally Posted by 1kBill
I think you mean Air China. China Air is a carrier out of Taiwan and I don't see any mergers between those two carriers.
Yes, you're right. I meant the mainland Chinese carrier, not the one based in Taiwan. Can I blame autocorrect here?
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2015, 7:00 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Shanghai and Bavaria
Programs: Spire RA, 1865 Voyager, Bonvoy Titanium, FB LP, LH SEN.
Posts: 3,104
10 years ago, CZ and MU were rumored to merge. Yawn. (Maybe they "merge back" some small players like MF, 3U or OQ to their parents.)
Chinatrvl is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2015, 3:47 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Plat, DL, AS, UA, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,407
I think it may be instructive to refer to this list I made a while ago: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/other...hina-list.html

The big problem with airlines in China is the operational inefficiency created by the archaic provincial and municipal interests that forces the Big 4 to invest in various regional affiliates that are "paper airlines". Things will be a lot better if the Big 3 are allowed to shut down their "paper airlines" and consolidate their marketing branding and sales operations.

As far as merging 2 or all 3 of the former CAAC carriers, I think it is a foolish idea. The impetus seems to come from certain circles in Chinese Govt that is really stuck in an outdated mindset. The idea is to form the biggest airline in the world so that Chinese airline can be compared to the big American airlines in terms of fleet size. In another word, it's a chest thumping idea not rooted in any sort of commercial reality.

China (ex-Hong Kong) has basically 4 mainline airlines (CA, MU, CZ, HU) and 2 viable low cost carrier (H0, 9C) covering a country that is the size of continental US and with 4.5 times the population. It is in need of more airlines, not fewer (more real airlines, not more "paper airlines" with provincial names on the fuselage that only fly to the province capital). The real problem is the lack of access to PVG/SHA and PEK and merging the big 3 is not going to change that. Without fundamental change in how slots and profitable routes are awarded at PVG/SHA and PEK, any talk of airline merger or reform is pointless. The current landscape in China basically ensure the Big 3 cannot be challenged.

Last edited by bzcat; Oct 27, 2015 at 4:43 pm
bzcat is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 10:01 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAH
Programs: Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist, DL Plat, UA Silver
Posts: 4,043
I always feel CA is getting too strong.

Maybe an MU and CZ merger would make the most sense?

Would it make any sense for CA to merge with HU at the same time?
TennisNoob is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 10:28 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,037
Originally Posted by TennisNoob
I always feel CA is getting too strong.

Maybe an MU and CZ merger would make the most sense?

Would it make any sense for CA to merge with HU at the same time?
Cz is larger than CA and mu.

Hu operates outside of the system, and likes it that way.
moondog is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 10:47 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAH
Programs: Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist, DL Plat, UA Silver
Posts: 4,043
Originally Posted by moondog
Cz is larger than CA and mu.
Domestic stand point or internationally?
TennisNoob is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 10:49 pm
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,037
Originally Posted by TennisNoob
Domestic stand point or internationally?
Combined.
moondog is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2015, 12:01 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Plat, DL, AS, UA, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,407
Originally Posted by moondog
Cz is larger than CA and mu.

Hu operates outside of the system, and likes it that way.
Yep... don't fall into the trap of thinking CZ as China Southern. It grabbed 2 other CAAC carriers earlier on and expanded into Western China. It is in fact all over China with 4 main hubs strategically located in CAN (Southeast), PEK (northeast), CKG (southwest), URC (northwest). And it has control MF and QQ, 2 largest "municipal" airlines in China, and owns a big stake in 3U.

China Southern Airlines 中国南方航空 (CZ) - SkyTeam
* Xiamen Airlines 厦门航空 (MF) (Full SkyTeam membership)
* Chongqing Airlines 重庆航空 (OQ)
* Sichuan Airlines 四川航空 (3U)
- Chengdu Airlines 成都航空 (EU) (formerly United Eagle Airlines/UEAir 联鹰航空)
- Hebei Airlines 河北航空 (NS)
* Guizhou Airlines 貴州航空 (G4)

[China Northern Airlines 中国北方航空 (CJ) merged with CZ in 2003]
[China Xinjiang Airlines 中国新疆航空 (XO) merged with CZ in 2003]
[Zhongyuan Airlines 中原航空 (Z2) disbanded by CZ in 2000]

Last edited by bzcat; Oct 29, 2015 at 12:07 pm
bzcat is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2015, 6:47 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAH
Programs: Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist, DL Plat, UA Silver
Posts: 4,043
Originally Posted by bzcat
Yep... don't fall into the trap of thinking CZ as China Southern. It grabbed 2 other CAAC carriers earlier on and expanded into Western China. It is in fact all over China with 4 main hubs strategically located in CAN (Southeast), PEK (northeast), CKG (southwest), URC (northwest). And it has control MF and QQ, 2 largest "municipal" airlines in China, and owns a big stake in 3U.

China Southern Airlines 中国南方航空 (CZ) - SkyTeam
* Xiamen Airlines 厦门航空 (MF) (Full SkyTeam membership)
* Sichuan Airlines 四川航空 (3U)
Ahhhh didn't know they owned Xiamen and Sichuan
TennisNoob is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2015, 12:45 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HKG, VCE, CAN
Programs: CX MPO
Posts: 585
Another piece today, this time on SCMP, is relaunching the rumour:
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/econo...a-southern-may
If it happens (and the article suggests at the end that corruption may be the trigger to CA action) it can be reasonably expected Skyteam to be the losing end of this round of consolidation.

Last edited by CXBA; Nov 1, 2015 at 12:47 am Reason: grammar
CXBA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.