Signatures on FT
Dec 9, 2007 | 6:25 pm
#16
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
This thread is closed for Randy's review.
Thank you,
Spiff and cblaisd, Only Randy Petersen moderators.
Thank you,
Spiff and cblaisd, Only Randy Petersen moderators.
Dec 12, 2007 | 5:11 am
#17
Founder of FlyerTalk
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 6,540
We decided against making a huge issue out of the automated changes since really the idea that this automation would prevent larger signatures, etc. only effects a smaller number of members and as a result, would be nothing more than over-communication to a large number of members.
As for the smaller size, from whatever i know, smaller sizes have always existed and still exists today. I'm just not sure what you feel you have to worry about, life (and signatures) is good.
As for the smaller size, from whatever i know, smaller sizes have always existed and still exists today. I'm just not sure what you feel you have to worry about, life (and signatures) is good.
Thanks for the clarification. I looked in TalkMail and didn't see any mention of the signature issue, so I guess "shortly" wasn't quite as shortly as I'd imagined; I guess you can understand why I got worried, then.
Normal post font size appears to be 2.5, actually, and therefore not selectable... Size 3 is bigger, while size 2 is smaller. Making sizes 1 and 2 available is therefore the best solution, and I appreciate it.
Normal post font size appears to be 2.5, actually, and therefore not selectable... Size 3 is bigger, while size 2 is smaller. Making sizes 1 and 2 available is therefore the best solution, and I appreciate it.