timeout for (public) timeout-requests?
#1
Original Poster
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: CH-3823 Wengen Switzerland
Programs: miles&more, MileagePlus
Posts: 27,043
timeout for (public) timeout-requests?
I propose a timeout for (public) timeout-requests.
#2
In Memoriam
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI USA UA 1K, AA EXP 1MM, SQ PPS, BA GOLD, Hyatt D, Hertz Plat and AMEX Cent
Posts: 2,996
Upon reflection, I support this - it is an unfortunate and growing trend.
#3
In Memoriam
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Always on vacation
Programs: aa exp - spg gold - Hyatt Diamond - HH Gold
Posts: 6,007
Sounds much like the soccer rule where the referee can give a player a 'caution' for the player asking the referee to give another player a 'caution.'
Two cautions and you are ejected
Two cautions and you are ejected
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
ONE person starting 2 or 3 of these threads can hardly be called a "trend", one email from Randy to the person in question should be sufficient.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.
Posts: 7,664
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Rudi:
I propose a timeout for (public) timeout-requests.</font>
I propose a timeout for (public) timeout-requests.</font>
Oh well.
mike
#6
Original Poster
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: CH-3823 Wengen Switzerland
Programs: miles&more, MileagePlus
Posts: 27,043
Do you realise you just requested your own timeout?

(well, I thought of time-out for the 'requests' - not for the posters ...)

(well, I thought of time-out for the 'requests' - not for the posters ...)
#7
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
I agree that Randy needs to control that same thread starter who continues a policy of harrassing those who do not agree with his view of life.He has also used email to try and get supporters for his motives,whatever they are.
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 13,344
I have no problem emailing the moderators of forums where posters tell others to F off, insult them etc., rather than post here.
But if I read the comments above properly, I should be banned for bringing this to the RP forum, twice? Granted under the OMNI one I should have emailed the mods and it was discussed with a moderator offline and resolved. But for the one in the AC forum where no moderator exists who do I email?
But if I read the comments above properly, I should be banned for bringing this to the RP forum, twice? Granted under the OMNI one I should have emailed the mods and it was discussed with a moderator offline and resolved. But for the one in the AC forum where no moderator exists who do I email?
#9
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: NZ Silver, AC SE100K, Westjet, Marriott, Global Entry
Posts: 6,849
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by MapleLeaf:
I have no problem emailing the moderators of forums where posters tell others to F off, insult them etc., rather than post here.
But if I read the comments above properly, I should be banned for bringing this to the RP forum, twice? Granted under the OMNI one I should have emailed the mods and it was discussed with a moderator offline and resolved. But for the one in the AC forum where no moderator exists who do I email?</font>
I have no problem emailing the moderators of forums where posters tell others to F off, insult them etc., rather than post here.
But if I read the comments above properly, I should be banned for bringing this to the RP forum, twice? Granted under the OMNI one I should have emailed the mods and it was discussed with a moderator offline and resolved. But for the one in the AC forum where no moderator exists who do I email?</font>
That would be called self moderation and only requires some common sense.
#10
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,216
Mapleleaf,
I have always found it more efficient to email Randy and his team directly when I had an issue... instead of posting here.
Just a thought!
William
I have always found it more efficient to email Randy and his team directly when I had an issue... instead of posting here.
Just a thought!
William
#11
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Gold / Hyatt Explorist / Hertz PC
Posts: 36,204
I agree with Papst on this one.
#12
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Quote by Maple Leaf:
But for the one in the AC forum where no moderator exists who do I email?
__________________________________________________ _________________
How about no one? You are not God here even though you give out communion in a theater.
Randy is the go to guy when all else fails?
How about him?
And how about this support for Empress on the AC board per the link below? Does that send you a message?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum5/HTML/012234.html
[This message has been edited by parnel (edited Dec 27, 2003).]
But for the one in the AC forum where no moderator exists who do I email?
__________________________________________________ _________________
How about no one? You are not God here even though you give out communion in a theater.
Randy is the go to guy when all else fails?
How about him?
And how about this support for Empress on the AC board per the link below? Does that send you a message?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum5/HTML/012234.html
[This message has been edited by parnel (edited Dec 27, 2003).]
#13


Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: BCT. Formerly known as attorney28
Programs: LH LT SEN,BA GGL GfL,Hyatt LT Gl,Mrtt LT P,HH LT D,IHG D-Amb,Acc D,GHA T,LHW A,Sixt/Av/Hz D/Pres
Posts: 6,947
I agree with Rudi.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wherever Oxfam wants me to go.
Posts: 3,966
I second Rudi's timeout.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,092
This will only create more problems than it solves. And the fact this suggestion wasn't done by via e-mail at a sensitive timing like this (with several threads of this nature around) just seems to invite more unnecessary divisions between FTers. Is this necessary?



