FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Changes to xONEx Rule Sheet (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/983365-changes-xonex-rule-sheet.html)

pandaperth Mar 3, 2013 4:00 am


Originally Posted by JohnAx (Post 20349466)
...so presumably SEZ is in Africa...

It is in Africa for the new Global Explorer rule sheet - it is one of the African countries listed in the exception allowing a second visit to Europe

2F3. For travel to/from or via Ghana/Kenya/Mozambique/Nigeria/ Rwanda /Seychelles /Tanzania/Uganda two permitted in Europe/Middle East when one is a transfer without stopover between Ghana /Kenya /Mozambique /Nigeria /Rwanda /Seychelles /Tanzania/Uganda and another continent.

ernestnywang Mar 6, 2013 2:00 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 20350060)
I think it cannot have been a Oneworld Explorer fare that you checked, since no OW airline flies to SEZ
It might have been an AGLOB34, now that QR can be included in a Global Explorer

I've tried checking GLOB fares ex-SEZ using KVS, but nothing is showing ... yet

Actually there are ex-SEZ xONEy fares, just that y>=4. Looks like pretty good deal to me if actually usable (but doubt it).

Code:

FQSEZSEZ-BA/USD«
SEZ-SEZ      CXR-BA      WED 06MAR13                    USD 
//SEE FQHELP FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE NEW FARE DISPLAYS// 
  SURCHARGE FOR PAPER TICKET MAY BE ADDED WHEN ITIN PRICED 
MULTIPLE SELLING CURRENCIES CONVERTED TO USD USING CURRENT BSR 
BA    SEZSEZ.RW      06MAR13          MPM 
  V  FARE BASIS AP  FARE-OW  FARE-RT BK  SEASON  MINMAX  RTG 
  1    LONE4      -            1508.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  2    LGLOB29    -            1508.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  3    LONE5      -            1667.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  4    LGLOB34    -            1667.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  5    LONE6      -            1905.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  6    LGLOB39    -            1905.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  7    DONE4      -            2937.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  8    DGLOB34    -            2937.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW02 
  9  A LGLOB29    -            3200.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 10    DONE5      -            3333.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 11    AONE4      -            3572.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 12    AGLOB34    -            3572.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW02 
 13  A LGLOB34    -            3700.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 14    DONE6      -            3810.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 15    AONE5      -            4048.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 16  A LGLOB39    -            4300.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 17    AONE6      -            4603.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01¥ 
 18  A DGLOB34    -            7100.00*D¥  ---      -/12M RW02¥ 
 19  A AGLOB34    -          10800.00*A¥  ---      -/12M RW02


Himeno Mar 6, 2013 4:15 am


Originally Posted by ernestnywang (Post 20369165)
Actually there are ex-SEZ xONEy fares, just that y>=4. Looks like pretty good deal to me if actually usable (but doubt it).

SEZ has had fares loaded for quite some time when oneworld did have service there (BA IIRC). When they pulled out, the fares stayed in the system but were not bookable.

pandaperth Mar 6, 2013 4:35 am

Yes. The xGLOBnn fares are now showing in KVS (they didn't show 3 days ago)
The fares are in USD, not SCR
And they match what you listed - the higher fares that is
for example, your listing below has two fares shown for each of LGLOB34, DGLOB34 and AGLOB34

KVS still doesn't show the OWE fares - xONEx
but I guess that is fair enough, because QR is not yet in OW

Still, we should now be able to book Global Explorer fares that start from/include SEZ
And since SEZ is in Africa, an ex-SEZ ticket can end anywhere in Africa


Originally Posted by ernestnywang (Post 20369165)
Actually there are ex-SEZ xONEy fares, just that y>=4. Looks like pretty good deal to me if actually usable (but doubt it).

Code:

FQSEZSEZ-BA/USD«
SEZ-SEZ      CXR-BA      WED 06MAR13                    USD 
//SEE FQHELP FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE NEW FARE DISPLAYS// 
  SURCHARGE FOR PAPER TICKET MAY BE ADDED WHEN ITIN PRICED 
MULTIPLE SELLING CURRENCIES CONVERTED TO USD USING CURRENT BSR 
BA    SEZSEZ.RW      06MAR13          MPM 
  V  FARE BASIS AP  FARE-OW  FARE-RT BK  SEASON  MINMAX  RTG 
  1    LONE4      -            1508.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  2    LGLOB29    -            1508.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  3    LONE5      -            1667.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  4    LGLOB34    -            1667.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  5    LONE6      -            1905.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  6    LGLOB39    -            1905.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  7    DONE4      -            2937.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  8    DGLOB34    -            2937.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW02 
  9  A LGLOB29    -            3200.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 10    DONE5      -            3333.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 11    AONE4      -            3572.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 12    AGLOB34    -            3572.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW02 
 13  A LGLOB34    -            3700.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 14    DONE6      -            3810.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 15    AONE5      -            4048.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 16  A LGLOB39    -            4300.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 17    AONE6      -            4603.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01¥ 
 18  A DGLOB34    -            7100.00*D¥  ---      -/12M RW02¥ 
 19  A AGLOB34    -          10800.00*A¥  ---      -/12M RW02



correctioncx Mar 6, 2013 9:22 pm


Originally Posted by ernestnywang (Post 20369165)
Actually there are ex-SEZ xONEy fares, just that y>=4. Looks like pretty good deal to me if actually usable (but doubt it).

Code:

FQSEZSEZ-BA/USD«
SEZ-SEZ      CXR-BA      WED 06MAR13                    USD 
//SEE FQHELP FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE NEW FARE DISPLAYS// 
  SURCHARGE FOR PAPER TICKET MAY BE ADDED WHEN ITIN PRICED 
MULTIPLE SELLING CURRENCIES CONVERTED TO USD USING CURRENT BSR 
BA    SEZSEZ.RW      06MAR13          MPM 
  V  FARE BASIS AP  FARE-OW  FARE-RT BK  SEASON  MINMAX  RTG 
  1    LONE4      -            1508.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  2    LGLOB29    -            1508.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  3    LONE5      -            1667.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  4    LGLOB34    -            1667.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  5    LONE6      -            1905.00 L¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  6    LGLOB39    -            1905.00 L    ---      -/12M RW02 
  7    DONE4      -            2937.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
  8    DGLOB34    -            2937.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW02 
  9  A LGLOB29    -            3200.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 10    DONE5      -            3333.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 11    AONE4      -            3572.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 12    AGLOB34    -            3572.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW02 
 13  A LGLOB34    -            3700.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 14    DONE6      -            3810.00 D¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 15    AONE5      -            4048.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01 
 16  A LGLOB39    -            4300.00*L    ---      -/12M RW02 
 17    AONE6      -            4603.00 A¥  ---      -/12M RW01¥ 
 18  A DGLOB34    -            7100.00*D¥  ---      -/12M RW02¥ 
 19  A AGLOB34    -          10800.00*A¥  ---      -/12M RW02


I can't seem to get the SEZ fares to pop up? How did you do it?

the fares look really good!!!! It might still be bookable as the first sector maybe able to be a land segment? can't it be???

moa999 Mar 6, 2013 11:32 pm


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 20369546)

KVS still doesn't show the OWE fares - xONEx
but I guess that is fair enough, because QR is not yet in OW

Still, we should now be able to book Global Explorer fares that start from/include SEZ
And since SEZ is in Africa, an ex-SEZ ticket can end anywhere in Africa

Yes, but the Global Explorer fares are nothing special (having recently gone up a lot -- ie actually been issued afresh)... and given the Explorer fares are normally close to xONEx fares from other starting points I would expect something to change (and not for the better) when QR joins.
Thus SEZ in my mind is moot.

ernestnywang Mar 7, 2013 2:23 am


Originally Posted by correctioncx (Post 20374903)
I can't seem to get the SEZ fares to pop up? How did you do it?

the fares look really good!!!! It might still be bookable as the first sector maybe able to be a land segment? can't it be???

I typed "FQSEZSEZ-BA/USD" in Abacus (Sabre). As others have said, it might not be bookable. I don't know.

correctioncx Mar 7, 2013 3:03 am

Actually if the Global Explorer fare is still Valid then it is NOT bad at all. because take the 34K miles, only 3.5K USD!

And u can take QR to escape SEZ first and then can end up in other parts of Africa Oneworld airline flies to..

Can be considered.......

jerry a. laska Mar 7, 2013 9:36 am


Originally Posted by correctioncx (Post 20374903)
I can't seem to get the SEZ fares to pop up? How did you do it?

the fares look really good!!!! It might still be bookable as the first sector maybe able to be a land segment? can't it be???

No.

correctioncx Mar 7, 2013 9:53 am


Originally Posted by jerry a. laska (Post 20377458)
No.

Well then global explorer seems ok? U can now use QR?

However how do we ticket this?

pandaperth Jul 2, 2013 2:30 am

New Version of the Rule Sheet - dated 1 July 2013
 
Now showing on the OW web site - link here

As far as I can see, the only change is in Rule 10 "Sales Restrictions"

Previous Wording:

When travel originates in a country for which a specific local currency fares is published and the ticket is sold in another country, the fare will be that published for the country of origin converted to the currency of the country of sale at the bank selling rate. The resultant fare must not be lower than from the country of sale.
Exception: Not applicable when BOTH travel originates and sales are made within the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA)/Switzerland.
New wording:

When travel originates in a country for which a specific local currency fares is published and the ticket is sold in another country, the fare will be that published for the country of origin converted to the currency of the country of sale at the bank selling rate. The resultant fare must not be lower than from the country of sale.
Exception: Not applicable when BOTH travel originates and sales are made within Europe.

JohnAx Jul 2, 2013 8:50 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 21025845)
Now showing on the OW web site - link here

As far as I can see, the only change is in Rule 10 "Sales Restrictions"

Previous Wording:
New wording:

Sounds like Europeans can now take advantage of cheap(er) ex-CAI fares without leaving home.

FlyerTalker688786 Jul 2, 2013 8:55 am


Originally Posted by JohnAx (Post 21027155)
Sounds like Europeans can now take advantage of cheap(er) ex-CAI fares without leaving home.

Please explain. ex-CAI would be ex-Middle East rather than ex-Europe I would think. No?

JohnAx Jul 2, 2013 8:03 pm


Originally Posted by chongcao (Post 21027178)
Please explain. ex-CAI would be ex-Middle East rather than ex-Europe I would think. No?

For xONEx trip-routing purposes, North Africa and the Middle East are in "Europe". That doesn't mean that OW is using the same definition for the purposes of the rule being discussed, of course.

Himeno Jul 3, 2013 5:13 am


Originally Posted by JohnAx (Post 21031128)
For xONEx trip-routing purposes, North Africa and the Middle East are in "Europe". That doesn't mean that OW is using the same definition for the purposes of the rule being discussed, of course.

Even though Middle East is part of "Europe" for continent routing rules, it is separate for other rules. ie, you can finish "within the middle east", not "within europe".

justin1123 Aug 13, 2013 3:07 am

How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?

I have KVS but the RTW option is no longer there under fares. Also haven't seen a list on here anywhere recently, apologies if I have missed this somehow!

Himeno Aug 13, 2013 3:38 am


Originally Posted by justin1123 (Post 21262503)
How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?

I have KVS but the RTW option is no longer there under fares. Also haven't seen a list on here anywhere recently, apologies if I have missed this somehow!

Expert Flyer, or pricing out basic trips on the tool.

No way at the moment to see current prices from more then one country at a time.

pandaperth Aug 13, 2013 3:51 am


Originally Posted by justin1123 (Post 21262503)
How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?

I have KVS but the RTW option is no longer there under fares. Also haven't seen a list on here anywhere recently, apologies if I have missed this somehow!

The RTW option in KVS has been gone for some time
but there is a (messy) way to get at them (but only one at a time, as Himeno said)
See http://www.kvstool.com/FAQ.php?Source=SD-HELP#RTW

anabolism Aug 30, 2013 11:05 pm


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 21025845)
As far as I can see, the only change is in Rule 10 "Sales Restrictions"

It no longer permits the purchase of additional segments above the four (six in N.A.) per continent. Or maybe this happened even earlier but I missed it then?


Originally Posted by justin1123 (Post 21262503)
How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?

I use ExpertFlyer. Enter the same airport code for origination, destination, and purchasing location. If desired, can also enter A, D, or L as booking code.

Still have to do a separate query origin by origin. There was some discussion a few years back about making the comparison spreadsheet available to EF subscribers, which would both make things easier for people to compare fares, continents, classes, and origins, and also reduce EF's costs since subscribers would access the spreadsheet rather than making multiple queries. But nothing came of it.

pandaperth Sep 15, 2013 10:19 pm


Originally Posted by anabolism (Post 21366507)
It no longer permits the purchase of additional segments above the four (six in N.A.) per continent. Or maybe this happened even earlier but I missed it then?

Well spotted:)

Checking on earlier versions - and the ability to purchase additional segments was still there in the March-2013 version.
So yes, rules have been further enhanced:(

pandaperth Oct 1, 2013 8:10 am

Yet another version of the rule sheet - dated 1-October-2013

The only change I can see is that LAN Columbia has been added to the list of allowed affiliate airlines in rule 2(j)

From another thread:

Originally Posted by themapelligroup (Post 21534305)
While LAN Colombia officially joined today it was also announced TAM will join on March 31:
http://www.oneworld.com/news-informa..._col_count%3D5


JohnAx Oct 1, 2013 2:10 pm


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 21450825)
Well spotted:)

Checking on earlier versions - and the ability to purchase additional segments was still there in the March-2013 version.
So yes, rules have been further enhanced:(

A 'typical' trip EU-NA-Asia-EU means the maximum possible is 17 segments (4+6+4+3 intercontinental) so to max the trip you'll have at least 5 in NA, whatever else you had in mind. Given the one-transcon limit and AA's paucity of longish north-south nonstops (and lots of competitively-priced alternatives for domestic travel) the new limit is quite disappointing.

Hopefully trips initiated before 31 Aug are grandfathered to the old rules, but best be prepared to 'discuss' the matter with the airline. (Anyone with on-going business with the AA RTW desk could please ask their agent how s/he thinks the new rule applies to old tickets and advise here, thanks.)

Mwenenzi Oct 1, 2013 4:19 pm


Originally Posted by JohnAx (Post 21536695)
A 'typical' trip EU-NA-Asia-EU means the maximum possible is 17 segments (4+6+4+3 intercontinental) ...
< snip >
Hopefully trips initiated before 31 Aug are grandfathered to the old rules, but best be prepared to 'discuss' the matter with the airline....

16 segment maximium on *ONE* tickets has been in place for several years. (10 years ago I did a 28 segment LONE5)

With previous changes the rules have been grandfathered to the rules in place when you purchased the ticket.

JohnAx Oct 2, 2013 12:38 am


Originally Posted by Mwenenzi (Post 21537406)
16 segment maximium on *ONE* tickets has been in place for several years. (10 years ago I did a 28 segment LONE5)

With previous changes the rules have been grandfathered to the rules in place when you purchased the ticket.

Didn't mean to suggest that we are suddenly getting 17 segments, rather that those who want to use their god-given 16 now have less flexibility in how to allocate them by continent.

On the grandfather thing, one thing that's not been grandfathered in the past is the right to use an airline (for more than a brief period) after it exits OW. I do expect existing trips will indeed be allowed to add segments as before, but also won't be surprised to find some agents who'll argue the point.

Himeno Oct 29, 2013 10:22 am

There are likely to be a number of rule changes to most oneworld products coming on Friday. Most will be to reflect QR's joining.
Will have to see if anything about the "SWP-EU counts as travel through Asia" rule changes.

skunker Oct 29, 2013 12:28 pm

The new rules are live for areas that are already at 10/30 (e.g. AKL).

There appear to be a bunch of new rules for travel to/from Africa.
Code:

EUROPE AND MIDDLE EAST - 4
            //NOT MORE THAN 2 OF WHICH MAY BE BETWEEN THE
              UK AND ALBANIA/ALGERIA/BULGARIA/CROATIA
              /CYPRUS/GREECE/ISRAEL/LIBYA/MIDDLE EAST
              /MOROCCO/ROMANIA/RUSSIA/TUNISIA/TURKEY
              /UKRAINE.
              //NOT MORE THAN 2 OF WHICH MAY BE BETWEEN
              RUSSIA WEST OF THE URALS AND RUSSIA EAST OF
              THE URALS.//
              //SEGMENTS BETWEEN EUROPE AND MIDDLE EAST
              ARE NOT PERMITTED IF TRAVEL INCLUDES AFRICA
              AND THE ITINERARY UTILISES THE BACKTRACKING
              PROVISION IN PARAGRAPH 4.E.3.1.3 OR 3.2.3//

Code:

SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR TRAVEL WHICH
                INCLUDES AFRICA. -
                FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING OTHER THAN IN AFRICA
                ONE OF THE FOLLOWING BACKTRACKS IS
                PERMITTED.
              3.1.1 //EUROPE-AFRICA-EUROPE//
                ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE MUST BE A
                TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
                AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT.  TRAVEL
                MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH AFRICA.
              3.1.2 //MIDDLE EAST-AFRICA-MIDDLE EAST//
                ONE OF THE VISITS TO MIDDLE EAST MUST BE A
                TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
                AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT.
              3.1.3 //EUROPE-AFRICA-MIDDLE EAST OR MIDDLE
                EAST-AFRICA-EUROPE//
                TRAVEL MAY NOT INCLUDE ANY FLOWN OR
                SURFACE SECTOR BETWEEN EUROPE AND MIDDLE
                EAST.
              FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING IN AFRICA ONE OF THE
              FOLLOWING BACKTRACKS IS PERMITTED.
              3.2.1 //AFRICA-EUROPE-RTW-EUROPE-AFRICA//
                ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE MUST BE A
                TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
                AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT.  TRAVEL
                MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH AFRICA.
              3.2.2 //AFRICA-MIDDLE EAST-RTW-MIDDLE EAST//
                ONE OF THE VISITS TO MIDDLE EAST MUST BE A
                TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
                AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT.
              3.2.3 //AFRICA-EUROPE-RTW-MIDDLE EAST-AFRICA
                OR AFRICA-MIDDLE EAST-RTW-EUROPE-AFRICA//
                TRAVEL MAY NOT INCLUDE ANY FLOWN OR
                SURFACE SECTOR BETWEEN EUROPE AND THE
                MIDDLE EAST.

So, you cannot do LHR-DXB-LHR-JNB-DOH...??

Item K has changed too:
Code:

K. 1. TRAVEL BETWEEN SOUTH WEST PACIFIC AND EUROPE
                /MIDDLE EAST ON A SINGLE FLIGHT NUMBER/OR BY
                SURFACE IS CONSIDERED TRAVELLING SWP-ASIA-
                EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST THROUGH THREE CONTINENTS.

They are still saying MEL-DOH or SYD-DXB would have to include Asia.

Gardyloo Oct 29, 2013 2:02 pm


Originally Posted by skunker (Post 21689395)
The new rules are live for areas that are already at 10/30 (e.g. AKL)...

Thanks, I guess.

dsf Oct 29, 2013 2:29 pm


Originally Posted by skunker (Post 21689395)
Item K has changed too:
Code:

K. 1. TRAVEL BETWEEN SOUTH WEST PACIFIC AND EUROPE
                /MIDDLE EAST ON A SINGLE FLIGHT NUMBER/OR BY
                SURFACE IS CONSIDERED TRAVELLING SWP-ASIA-
                EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST THROUGH THREE CONTINENTS.

They are still saying MEL-DOH or SYD-DXB would have to include Asia.

:td: No DONE3s for me :(

Himeno Oct 29, 2013 3:45 pm


Originally Posted by dsf (Post 21690233)
:td: No DONE3s for me :(

Just need MH to restart their Africa-South America flight or AA to start the rumored MIA-JNB.

The oneworld website is updated, but is linking to old rule sheets. (July for xONEx and September for xGLOBnn)

skunker Oct 29, 2013 3:55 pm

The RTW tool is showing QR routes but isn't showing QR flights, so I can't play around with the new rules.

dsf Oct 29, 2013 4:03 pm


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 21690670)
Just need MH to restart their Africa-South America flight or AA to start the rumored MIA-JNB.

I have family in SWP and was hoping for Europe-SWP-North (or South) America :(

Himeno Oct 29, 2013 4:27 pm


Originally Posted by dsf (Post 21690751)
I have family in SWP and was hoping for Europe-SWP-North (or South) America :(

Get an xONE3 through SIN and have extra budget flights from there?

checkerboard Oct 29, 2013 5:15 pm

We'll have to wait for the full rules to be sure, but if I'm correctly reading these initial changes for Africa backtracking, it might turn out to make the product more flexible after all.

Previously, the Africa backtracking provision (for two transits through Europe) applied to an ever-changing and short list of countries;

Now, though, it seems the two transits through Europe are allowed for any African country. Sure, in the case of South Africa or MRU both transits would need to be on QR (or RJ) rather than BA, but on balance, I think this could be a plus.

skunker Oct 29, 2013 5:25 pm


Originally Posted by checkerboard (Post 21691212)
We'll have to wait for the full rules to be sure, but if I'm correctly reading these initial changes for Africa backtracking, it might turn out to make the product more flexible after all.

Previously, the Africa backtracking provision (for two transits through Europe) applied to an ever-changing and short list of countries;

Now, though, it seems the two transits through Europe are allowed for any African country. Sure, in the case of South Africa or MRU both transits would need to be on QR (or RJ) rather than BA, but on balance, I think this could be a plus.

I can pull the full rules from EF but I didn't think anyone wanted to see that wall of text. :D

Full Score Oct 30, 2013 4:50 am


Originally Posted by skunker (Post 21691252)
I can pull the full rules from EF but I didn't think anyone wanted to see that wall of text. :D

Yes, please. Or the URL.

Reality_Czech Oct 30, 2013 8:09 am


Originally Posted by skunker (Post 21689395)
So, you cannot do LHR-DXB-LHR-JNB-DOH...??

I read it so that you cannot do LHR-JNB-DOH-BOM ?

YOu would think that it would be sensible to have a clause to allow 2nd entry to Europe when transit via Middle East for travel between Africa & Asia.

skunker Oct 30, 2013 9:35 am


Originally Posted by Reality_Czech (Post 21694332)
I read it so that you cannot do LHR-JNB-DOH-BOM ?

YOu would think that it would be sensible to have a clause to allow 2nd entry to Europe when transit via Middle East for travel between Africa & Asia.

No, it specially allows that routing. The old rules use to only allow two flights between LON and ME, that rule is still there. But, now they have further specified that you cannot have those flights if you enter/leave Africa via ME (aka DOH). The worst part about that is it does not allow any flights to/from Europe not just the UK.

My reading:
Bad - ...KUL-CDG-DOH-LHR-JNB-DOH-JFK...
Good - ...KUL-CDG-DOH-LHR-JNB-LHR-JFK...

JohnAx Oct 30, 2013 6:03 pm

No "extra in-continent segments" is from 1 July 2013
 

Originally Posted by anabolism (Post 21366507)
It no longer permits the purchase of additional segments above the four (six in N.A.) per continent. Or maybe this happened even earlier but I missed it then? ...snip...

Just FWIW for those wondering if their elderly xONEx tickets grandfather the two-extra-segments-per-continent benefit, the AA desk agreed that 1 July 2013 was the date of the change that eliminated it.

anabolism Oct 30, 2013 9:55 pm


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 21690670)
Just need MH to restart their Africa-South America flight or AA to start the rumored MIA-JNB.

AA MIA-JNB would be excellent, since most of our RTWs are en-JNB, and it gets hard to find award space to get there to start.

Moomba Nov 1, 2013 6:24 am

The most significant changes I can see that will hurt is the last sentence of 3.2.1.

FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING IN AFRICA ONE OF THE
FOLLOWING BACKTRACKS IS PERMITTED.
3.2.1 //AFRICA-EUROPE-RTW-EUROPE-AFRICA//
ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE MUST BE A
TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT. TRAVEL
MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH AFRICA.

This means that we can no longer start in SA and finish in NBO (or similar) with two passes through Europe.

My current RTW now shows as invalid as I started in JNB and will finish in NBO with one stop and one transit without stop in Europe.

From my understanding of this if you start in SA or MRU you will always have to go via Asia without visiting the rest of Europe in one direction of travel if you want to visit Europe the other direction.

Also 3.2.3. No ME sector from/to Europe if you start in Africa. :eek:


These things are becoming more and more restrictive and more and more expensive. :mad:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.