![]() |
Originally Posted by JohnAx
(Post 20349466)
...so presumably SEZ is in Africa...
2F3. For travel to/from or via Ghana/Kenya/Mozambique/Nigeria/ Rwanda /Seychelles /Tanzania/Uganda two permitted in Europe/Middle East when one is a transfer without stopover between Ghana /Kenya /Mozambique /Nigeria /Rwanda /Seychelles /Tanzania/Uganda and another continent. |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 20350060)
I think it cannot have been a Oneworld Explorer fare that you checked, since no OW airline flies to SEZ
It might have been an AGLOB34, now that QR can be included in a Global Explorer I've tried checking GLOB fares ex-SEZ using KVS, but nothing is showing ... yet Code:
FQSEZSEZ-BA/USD« |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 20369165)
Actually there are ex-SEZ xONEy fares, just that y>=4. Looks like pretty good deal to me if actually usable (but doubt it).
|
Yes. The xGLOBnn fares are now showing in KVS (they didn't show 3 days ago)
The fares are in USD, not SCR And they match what you listed - the higher fares that is for example, your listing below has two fares shown for each of LGLOB34, DGLOB34 and AGLOB34 KVS still doesn't show the OWE fares - xONEx but I guess that is fair enough, because QR is not yet in OW Still, we should now be able to book Global Explorer fares that start from/include SEZ And since SEZ is in Africa, an ex-SEZ ticket can end anywhere in Africa
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 20369165)
Actually there are ex-SEZ xONEy fares, just that y>=4. Looks like pretty good deal to me if actually usable (but doubt it).
Code:
FQSEZSEZ-BA/USD« |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 20369165)
Actually there are ex-SEZ xONEy fares, just that y>=4. Looks like pretty good deal to me if actually usable (but doubt it).
Code:
FQSEZSEZ-BA/USD«the fares look really good!!!! It might still be bookable as the first sector maybe able to be a land segment? can't it be??? |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 20369546)
KVS still doesn't show the OWE fares - xONEx but I guess that is fair enough, because QR is not yet in OW Still, we should now be able to book Global Explorer fares that start from/include SEZ And since SEZ is in Africa, an ex-SEZ ticket can end anywhere in Africa Thus SEZ in my mind is moot. |
Originally Posted by correctioncx
(Post 20374903)
I can't seem to get the SEZ fares to pop up? How did you do it?
the fares look really good!!!! It might still be bookable as the first sector maybe able to be a land segment? can't it be??? |
Actually if the Global Explorer fare is still Valid then it is NOT bad at all. because take the 34K miles, only 3.5K USD!
And u can take QR to escape SEZ first and then can end up in other parts of Africa Oneworld airline flies to.. Can be considered....... |
Originally Posted by correctioncx
(Post 20374903)
I can't seem to get the SEZ fares to pop up? How did you do it?
the fares look really good!!!! It might still be bookable as the first sector maybe able to be a land segment? can't it be??? |
Originally Posted by jerry a. laska
(Post 20377458)
No.
However how do we ticket this? |
New Version of the Rule Sheet - dated 1 July 2013
Now showing on the OW web site - link here
As far as I can see, the only change is in Rule 10 "Sales Restrictions" Previous Wording: When travel originates in a country for which a specific local currency fares is published and the ticket is sold in another country, the fare will be that published for the country of origin converted to the currency of the country of sale at the bank selling rate. The resultant fare must not be lower than from the country of sale. Exception: Not applicable when BOTH travel originates and sales are made within the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA)/Switzerland. When travel originates in a country for which a specific local currency fares is published and the ticket is sold in another country, the fare will be that published for the country of origin converted to the currency of the country of sale at the bank selling rate. The resultant fare must not be lower than from the country of sale. Exception: Not applicable when BOTH travel originates and sales are made within Europe. |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 21025845)
Now showing on the OW web site - link here
As far as I can see, the only change is in Rule 10 "Sales Restrictions" Previous Wording: New wording: |
Originally Posted by JohnAx
(Post 21027155)
Sounds like Europeans can now take advantage of cheap(er) ex-CAI fares without leaving home.
|
Originally Posted by chongcao
(Post 21027178)
Please explain. ex-CAI would be ex-Middle East rather than ex-Europe I would think. No?
|
Originally Posted by JohnAx
(Post 21031128)
For xONEx trip-routing purposes, North Africa and the Middle East are in "Europe". That doesn't mean that OW is using the same definition for the purposes of the rule being discussed, of course.
|
How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?
I have KVS but the RTW option is no longer there under fares. Also haven't seen a list on here anywhere recently, apologies if I have missed this somehow! |
Originally Posted by justin1123
(Post 21262503)
How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?
I have KVS but the RTW option is no longer there under fares. Also haven't seen a list on here anywhere recently, apologies if I have missed this somehow! No way at the moment to see current prices from more then one country at a time. |
Originally Posted by justin1123
(Post 21262503)
How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?
I have KVS but the RTW option is no longer there under fares. Also haven't seen a list on here anywhere recently, apologies if I have missed this somehow! but there is a (messy) way to get at them (but only one at a time, as Himeno said) See http://www.kvstool.com/FAQ.php?Source=SD-HELP#RTW |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 21025845)
As far as I can see, the only change is in Rule 10 "Sales Restrictions"
Originally Posted by justin1123
(Post 21262503)
How can I find out the latest LONEx and DONEx fares for different countries?
Still have to do a separate query origin by origin. There was some discussion a few years back about making the comparison spreadsheet available to EF subscribers, which would both make things easier for people to compare fares, continents, classes, and origins, and also reduce EF's costs since subscribers would access the spreadsheet rather than making multiple queries. But nothing came of it. |
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 21366507)
It no longer permits the purchase of additional segments above the four (six in N.A.) per continent. Or maybe this happened even earlier but I missed it then?
Checking on earlier versions - and the ability to purchase additional segments was still there in the March-2013 version. So yes, rules have been further enhanced:( |
Yet another version of the rule sheet - dated 1-October-2013
The only change I can see is that LAN Columbia has been added to the list of allowed affiliate airlines in rule 2(j) From another thread:
Originally Posted by themapelligroup
(Post 21534305)
While LAN Colombia officially joined today it was also announced TAM will join on March 31:
http://www.oneworld.com/news-informa..._col_count%3D5 |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 21450825)
Well spotted:)
Checking on earlier versions - and the ability to purchase additional segments was still there in the March-2013 version. So yes, rules have been further enhanced:( Hopefully trips initiated before 31 Aug are grandfathered to the old rules, but best be prepared to 'discuss' the matter with the airline. (Anyone with on-going business with the AA RTW desk could please ask their agent how s/he thinks the new rule applies to old tickets and advise here, thanks.) |
Originally Posted by JohnAx
(Post 21536695)
A 'typical' trip EU-NA-Asia-EU means the maximum possible is 17 segments (4+6+4+3 intercontinental) ...
< snip > Hopefully trips initiated before 31 Aug are grandfathered to the old rules, but best be prepared to 'discuss' the matter with the airline.... With previous changes the rules have been grandfathered to the rules in place when you purchased the ticket. |
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 21537406)
16 segment maximium on *ONE* tickets has been in place for several years. (10 years ago I did a 28 segment LONE5)
With previous changes the rules have been grandfathered to the rules in place when you purchased the ticket. On the grandfather thing, one thing that's not been grandfathered in the past is the right to use an airline (for more than a brief period) after it exits OW. I do expect existing trips will indeed be allowed to add segments as before, but also won't be surprised to find some agents who'll argue the point. |
There are likely to be a number of rule changes to most oneworld products coming on Friday. Most will be to reflect QR's joining.
Will have to see if anything about the "SWP-EU counts as travel through Asia" rule changes. |
The new rules are live for areas that are already at 10/30 (e.g. AKL).
There appear to be a bunch of new rules for travel to/from Africa. Code:
EUROPE AND MIDDLE EAST - 4Code:
SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR TRAVEL WHICHItem K has changed too: Code:
K. 1. TRAVEL BETWEEN SOUTH WEST PACIFIC AND EUROPE |
Originally Posted by skunker
(Post 21689395)
The new rules are live for areas that are already at 10/30 (e.g. AKL)...
|
Originally Posted by skunker
(Post 21689395)
Item K has changed too:
Code:
K. 1. TRAVEL BETWEEN SOUTH WEST PACIFIC AND EUROPE |
Originally Posted by dsf
(Post 21690233)
:td: No DONE3s for me :(
The oneworld website is updated, but is linking to old rule sheets. (July for xONEx and September for xGLOBnn) |
The RTW tool is showing QR routes but isn't showing QR flights, so I can't play around with the new rules.
|
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 21690670)
Just need MH to restart their Africa-South America flight or AA to start the rumored MIA-JNB.
|
Originally Posted by dsf
(Post 21690751)
I have family in SWP and was hoping for Europe-SWP-North (or South) America :(
|
We'll have to wait for the full rules to be sure, but if I'm correctly reading these initial changes for Africa backtracking, it might turn out to make the product more flexible after all.
Previously, the Africa backtracking provision (for two transits through Europe) applied to an ever-changing and short list of countries; Now, though, it seems the two transits through Europe are allowed for any African country. Sure, in the case of South Africa or MRU both transits would need to be on QR (or RJ) rather than BA, but on balance, I think this could be a plus. |
Originally Posted by checkerboard
(Post 21691212)
We'll have to wait for the full rules to be sure, but if I'm correctly reading these initial changes for Africa backtracking, it might turn out to make the product more flexible after all.
Previously, the Africa backtracking provision (for two transits through Europe) applied to an ever-changing and short list of countries; Now, though, it seems the two transits through Europe are allowed for any African country. Sure, in the case of South Africa or MRU both transits would need to be on QR (or RJ) rather than BA, but on balance, I think this could be a plus. |
Originally Posted by skunker
(Post 21691252)
I can pull the full rules from EF but I didn't think anyone wanted to see that wall of text. :D
|
Originally Posted by skunker
(Post 21689395)
So, you cannot do LHR-DXB-LHR-JNB-DOH...??
YOu would think that it would be sensible to have a clause to allow 2nd entry to Europe when transit via Middle East for travel between Africa & Asia. |
Originally Posted by Reality_Czech
(Post 21694332)
I read it so that you cannot do LHR-JNB-DOH-BOM ?
YOu would think that it would be sensible to have a clause to allow 2nd entry to Europe when transit via Middle East for travel between Africa & Asia. My reading: Bad - ...KUL-CDG-DOH-LHR-JNB-DOH-JFK... Good - ...KUL-CDG-DOH-LHR-JNB-LHR-JFK... |
No "extra in-continent segments" is from 1 July 2013
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 21366507)
It no longer permits the purchase of additional segments above the four (six in N.A.) per continent. Or maybe this happened even earlier but I missed it then? ...snip...
|
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 21690670)
Just need MH to restart their Africa-South America flight or AA to start the rumored MIA-JNB.
|
The most significant changes I can see that will hurt is the last sentence of 3.2.1.
FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING IN AFRICA ONE OF THE FOLLOWING BACKTRACKS IS PERMITTED. 3.2.1 //AFRICA-EUROPE-RTW-EUROPE-AFRICA// ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE MUST BE A TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT. TRAVEL MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH AFRICA. This means that we can no longer start in SA and finish in NBO (or similar) with two passes through Europe. My current RTW now shows as invalid as I started in JNB and will finish in NBO with one stop and one transit without stop in Europe. From my understanding of this if you start in SA or MRU you will always have to go via Asia without visiting the rest of Europe in one direction of travel if you want to visit Europe the other direction. Also 3.2.3. No ME sector from/to Europe if you start in Africa. :eek: These things are becoming more and more restrictive and more and more expensive. :mad: |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.