Is this DONE4 routing acceptable?
#31
Original Poster




Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 968
Hey chaps, apologies for coming back to this so often.
I have ascertained I can not start in JNB and fly back to it and then out of SA.
What happens thou if I start in PLZ and do this,
PLZ-JNB-CPT-JNB-LHR-NYC-ETC ETC ETC.
I have ascertained I can not start in JNB and fly back to it and then out of SA.
What happens thou if I start in PLZ and do this,
PLZ-JNB-CPT-JNB-LHR-NYC-ETC ETC ETC.
#32
Moderator, OneWorld




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,518
#33
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Juneau, Alaska.
Programs: AS 75K;BA Silver;AA G;HH Dia;HY Glob
Posts: 16,677
#34
Original Poster




Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 968
LHR-JFK in J on BA or AA, on AA I get miles.
I am going to fly LHR-JFK in the coming months in J. I have flown BA J a number of times but I have never had a ride on the new product.
Do I fly on BA across the pond in J and miss out on the miles or go AA and get the miles. Is there much difference between the two products in J, especially to warrant the loss of miles?
Do I fly on BA across the pond in J and miss out on the miles or go AA and get the miles. Is there much difference between the two products in J, especially to warrant the loss of miles?
#35


Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Boston, MA (BOS)
Programs: AA PLT Pro 2MM, DL Gold, UA Silver, Marriott Titanium + LT Plat, COFC Venture X, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 5,603
I haven't experienced the new BA J product, but I prefer NGBC over the older BA J product. However, as for the miles, only you can decide how important ~15-20K miles are to you (depending on bonuses and promotions).
#36
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF LTG / P1 , LH LT SEN / HON, OZ LT Diamond +, Marriott LT PT, HH Diamond,
Posts: 15,149
This is FT. Go for the flight where you will get the miles.
The updated BA product is nice, but not much different to the old one which already was quite good anyway.
The updated BA product is nice, but not much different to the old one which already was quite good anyway.
#37
Original Poster




Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 968
#38




Join Date: May 2005
Programs: AA EXP, DL Plat, US Chairman, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, IC RA
Posts: 1,439
IMHO, JFK-LHR is a short enough flight that the difference between AA & BA isn't significant enough to warrant losing the EQM.
BA J is nice because of the flat seats, but I actually found that I sleep just as well on AA. Their "wedgie" seats don't seem to bother me as much as those from SQ, AF and others...
BA J is nice because of the flat seats, but I actually found that I sleep just as well on AA. Their "wedgie" seats don't seem to bother me as much as those from SQ, AF and others...
#40



Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SYD
Programs: |QF LTG|DL Gold|
Posts: 1,784
Agree with Dave Noble - if you were flying overnight JFK-LHR, pick BA because it's a fully flat bed and on the Sleeper Service you eat dinner in the lounge before and then get about 7 hours sleep. As you're flying the other way, you'll probably stay awake the whole flight so a fully flat bed is less critical - and the miles are!
#41
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF LTG / P1 , LH LT SEN / HON, OZ LT Diamond +, Marriott LT PT, HH Diamond,
Posts: 15,149
BA is clearly the better product. The lie flat seat and the service IMHO are better. However, if you don't have to be super fit in London and go straight to the most important meeting of your life, I personally would take the miles over a better seat.
#42
Moderator, OneWorld




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,518
Overnight flights from JFK to LHR are too short to make the best use of the BA beds. I would strongly endorse the morning AA flight, which not only is fine in comfort terms, but also allows sleeping in beds on both sides of the pond. I find the day flights really reduce jetlag too.


