Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BAEC vs QF FFP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2008 | 5:07 am
  #16  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
50 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF LTG / P1 , LH LT SEN / HON, OZ LT Diamond +, Marriott LT PT, HH Diamond,
Posts: 15,149
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
Not quite true! QF is a easy programme ONLY if flying in F or J, otherwise it is quite a challenging programme. Even CX's notoriously difficult programme is easier when flying in Y than QF so it's definitely horses for courses.
The OP was asking about BEAC vs QF and I think QF is still the easiest even in Y-. But you are right, among all OW programs others might be better when flying SYD-MEL on $99 tickets all the time.

Originally Posted by Traveloguy
Not sure what creative routings you have come up with, but a DONE4 is unlikely to get you WP + PG. AONE4 on the other hand is possible although still a challenge - PG after all is 2100 SCs which is a huge number of SCs to get.

FWIW, the only reason I still credit to QF is lifetime status.
It is actually very likely. I had a non optimized DONE4 with almost 2000SCs this year and I am on another one at the moment which has more than 2100SCs.
So lifetime status keeps me going as well.

Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
For the few days left that can ticket a 20 segment DONE4 it is possible to get PG on QF, albeit reasonably well optimised. I'm not sure it will still be possible from 1 June with the 16 segment limit.
The answer is:

syd-nrt-del-nrt-cgk-nrt-jfk-dfw-anc-dfw-jfk-lax-lhr-mct-lhr-nrt-syd

16 segments, 61095 miles and 2100SCs. WP+PG. The transcon USA can't have business class so you might need to play around with this.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.