Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

MEL-HKG in J: CX or QF?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

MEL-HKG in J: CX or QF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2008 | 12:09 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: BCN
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,084
MEL-HKG in J: CX or QF?

Thanks in advance for any advice you guys may have on this... It's been years since I've flown on CX or QF, and I really don't know how one compares to the other at this point.

I'm debating whether to fly QF or CX on an overnight flight MEL-HKG, and it really seems like a toss-up to me except that the QF flight leaves an hour earlier and leaves more room for an onward flight (which is on CX).

Does anyone have any advice on which one is better for sleeping? It doesn't look like it's the new CX J on this route (seat map has 2-2-2 seating).
glex50 is offline  
Old May 23, 2008 | 4:23 pm
  #2  
tt7
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MEL
Posts: 2,441
We had the same 'issue' recently and opted for the QF flight because it left at a slightly more civilized time (11.59 pm versus 1.20 am for the CX flight, iirc) and also gave us an extra hour on the ground in HKG to enjoy the Wing and have a shower and a leisurely breakfast.

For sleeping, I prefer the QF Skybed to the (old) CX seats, which would just reinforce the decision to take the QF flight.
tt7 is offline  
Old May 23, 2008 | 4:25 pm
  #3  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF LTS, Marriott LTP, ALL GOLD
Posts: 2,442
I'd take the QF skybed over the older Cathay seat
ANstar is offline  
Old May 23, 2008 | 4:42 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: dublin,ireland AA ( 3mm)
Posts: 1,826
Me too QF over CX old J
eireman is offline  
Old May 23, 2008 | 5:34 pm
  #5  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,657
And another +1
SNA_Flyer is offline  
Old May 23, 2008 | 5:37 pm
  #6  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
50 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF LTG / P1 , LH LT SEN / HON, OZ LT Diamond +, Marriott LT PT, HH Diamond,
Posts: 15,153
And another one! I would actually take the QF seat over the new CX totally flat seats. Just not a fan of this chicken in cages layout they are having.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old May 23, 2008 | 5:45 pm
  #7  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,547
Originally Posted by AN_Boy
I'd take the QF skybed over the older Cathay seat
Yep.
Gardyloo is online now  
Old May 24, 2008 | 4:42 am
  #8  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SYD
Posts: 3,045
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
And another one! I would actually take the QF seat over the new CX totally flat seats. Just not a fan of this chicken in cages layout they are having.
Ditto.
Keith009 is offline  
Old May 24, 2008 | 1:50 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: BCN
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,084
Originally Posted by tt7
We had the same 'issue' recently and opted for the QF flight because it left at a slightly more civilized time (11.59 pm versus 1.20 am for the CX flight, iirc) and also gave us an extra hour on the ground in HKG to enjoy the Wing and have a shower and a leisurely breakfast.

For sleeping, I prefer the QF Skybed to the (old) CX seats, which would just reinforce the decision to take the QF flight.
For August (when I'd be flying), the schedule is forward an hour, so the CX flight is at a more reasonble time (12:15am). Still, the earlier arrival gives me a greater margin with the connection...I hope.

Still, sounds like the verdict is resoundingly in favor of QF!

Thanks, everyone!
glex50 is offline  
Old May 25, 2008 | 9:05 pm
  #10  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LON
Programs: QF Plat & LTG, VA Plat
Posts: 1,438
QF - better seat for sleeping and privacy, 744 upper deck better than 333.
CX - i prefer their IFE as it is rock solid, the service is always exceptional though (QF can be variable).

On an overnight flight I would definitely take QF.
justin_krusty is offline  
Old May 27, 2008 | 5:46 am
  #11  
NM
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Programs: AA Plat & LTG; QF LTG
Posts: 9,837
I am on the QF29 MEL-HKG tonight (departs in about an hour). I chose the QF flight for a few reasons:
Departure time is 10:50pm vs something after 1am
Waitlist for F upgrade with QF using QF FF points (which cleared )
QF FLounge is excellent, and I believe it closes after the QF29 flight boards (may be wrong here assumption??)
QF flight is guaranteed to be Skybeds, while the CX aircraft is occasionally subbed with a regional config.

However, on my return LHR-SYD I have selected to use CX to try out their new business class seats.
NM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.