LHR lounges
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 9,131
LHR lounges
(I hate that you can't search using terms of three or fewer characters, as that eliminates using BA, LHR, and T3.)
I'll be flying on a OW RTW in August 2008, including legs HKG-LHR on BA and LHR-LAX on AA. I had been on LGW-DFW instead, but switched to LHR-LAX since it is a longer flight and I'm in F.
However, BA has a First lounge in LGW and not in LHR T3, right? And since we're departing on AA, which uses T3, we can't visit the BA First lounges in the other LHR terminals, I assume?
Last time I flew out of LHR it was on BA to HKG, and the First lounge was terrific. Order-off-the-menu meal service, and a massage at the MB spa. It would be very nice to get that again. Is it worth switching back to LGW-DFW?
I'll be flying on a OW RTW in August 2008, including legs HKG-LHR on BA and LHR-LAX on AA. I had been on LGW-DFW instead, but switched to LHR-LAX since it is a longer flight and I'm in F.
However, BA has a First lounge in LGW and not in LHR T3, right? And since we're departing on AA, which uses T3, we can't visit the BA First lounges in the other LHR terminals, I assume?
Last time I flew out of LHR it was on BA to HKG, and the First lounge was terrific. Order-off-the-menu meal service, and a massage at the MB spa. It would be very nice to get that again. Is it worth switching back to LGW-DFW?
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 46,129
Indeed; since departing from T3 , you cannot use the BA lounges
Are you connecting in London or actually stopping. If connecting, it would seem madness to me to put a LHR-LGW connection in just for the sake of lounge access; if you really want lounge access in that instance, just switch to BA LHR-LAX and have a nice easy connection T1-T1
If you are stopping in London, then I would switch to the LGW departure
As far as searching for small words, google will do it ; put the seach criteria in plus site:flyertalk.com
Dave
Are you connecting in London or actually stopping. If connecting, it would seem madness to me to put a LHR-LGW connection in just for the sake of lounge access; if you really want lounge access in that instance, just switch to BA LHR-LAX and have a nice easy connection T1-T1
If you are stopping in London, then I would switch to the LGW departure
As far as searching for small words, google will do it ; put the seach criteria in plus site:flyertalk.com
Dave
#3
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 9,131
That's what I figured. A shame.
We have an overnight, and were thinking of staying at an airport Hilton rather than gamble on an upgrade (as HH Diamond) on the Hilton Paddington (it is easy to get to, and nice if you get an upgrade and lounge access, but unpleasant otherwise). I don't want to switch from AA to BA since I'm flying on a DONE and using AA VIPs to upgrade to F (my partner is on a OW F award).
So we're giving up the BA First lounge but getting an extra hour in the AA 777 Flagship Suites and getting the AA Flagship Lounge in LAX instead of just the Admiral's Club in DFW. We also need to connect from LAX-SAN on a Saab (and the smaller regular 340B instead of the nicer 340B+) instead of DFW-SAN on an MD80 which at least has first class.
So I'm not sure which way is best. Quite a trade-off either way.
I do that quite often, but it is still hard to find the write posts. It would help if there was a good way to restrict the search results to a specific forum. I suppose including the string "FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld" would do this.
Are you connecting in London or actually stopping. If connecting, it would seem madness to me to put a LHR-LGW connection in just for the sake of lounge access; if you really want lounge access in that instance, just switch to BA LHR-LAX and have a nice easy connection T1-T1
If you are stopping in London, then I would switch to the LGW departure
If you are stopping in London, then I would switch to the LGW departure
So we're giving up the BA First lounge but getting an extra hour in the AA 777 Flagship Suites and getting the AA Flagship Lounge in LAX instead of just the Admiral's Club in DFW. We also need to connect from LAX-SAN on a Saab (and the smaller regular 340B instead of the nicer 340B+) instead of DFW-SAN on an MD80 which at least has first class.
So I'm not sure which way is best. Quite a trade-off either way.
I do that quite often, but it is still hard to find the write posts. It would help if there was a good way to restrict the search results to a specific forum. I suppose including the string "FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld" would do this.
#4


Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MEL/LAX
Programs: AAdv GLD(MM), QF LTS, UA MP_nada, HH Gld, SPG, GoldenCircle Jade
Posts: 4,478
Flying LHR-LAX from T3 use the CX F lounge (head to Gate Lounge A) - much more peaceful than any BA lounge at LHR, and decent. Service is always with a smile, and the food offering is fine too - the dimsum are a good snack and they make noodles on request (menu on the buffet). It's not the Wing, but it's the best in T3 for OW, and in some respects better than the BA lounges in other terminals.
#5
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 9,131
Flying LHR-LAX from T3 use the CX F lounge (head to Gate Lounge A) - much more peaceful than any BA lounge at LHR, and decent. Service is always with a smile, and the food offering is fine too - the dimsum are a good snack and they make noodles on request (menu on the buffet). It's not the Wing, but it's the best in T3 for OW, and in some respects better than the BA lounges in other terminals.
#6
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
#7
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 9,131
#8
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
They're both nice lounges. You really can't go wrong with either. Fly from whatever is more convenient for you.
#9
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 1,122
Are you connecting in London or actually stopping. If connecting, it would seem madness to me to put a LHR-LGW connection in just for the sake of lounge access; if you really want lounge access in that instance, just switch to BA LHR-LAX and have a nice easy connection T1-T1
Not sure when the move is happening, but won't BA/QF have a lounge in T3 when their flights move there?
#10
Original Member

Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
But the OP clearly knows what he is doing and has deliberately chosen inferior services (avoiding the fine CX service HKG-LHR and the better BA service LHR-US; sadly AA F service has slipped badly in the past year and I can no longer recommend it, as it is generally inferior to the new BA J+ service on most routes -- and if you recall my past posts, I was an avid champion of AA and often chose to fly AA F over BA F in the past, so I do this with regret). AA has made one change too many in cutting back on its premium services -- and it shows. I guess those new J seats -- a complete disaster -- are costing too much money, and the rest of the service has had to give.
#11
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 9,131
But the OP clearly knows what he is doing and has deliberately chosen inferior services (avoiding the fine CX service HKG-LHR and the better BA service LHR-US; sadly AA F service has slipped badly in the past year and I can no longer recommend it, as it is generally inferior to the new BA J+ service on most routes -- and if you recall my past posts, I was an avid champion of AA and often chose to fly AA F over BA F in the past, so I do this with regret). AA has made one change too many in cutting back on its premium services -- and it shows. I guess those new J seats -- a complete disaster -- are costing too much money, and the rest of the service has had to give.
We're flying AA instead of BA LHR-LAX because that way we can both be in F, since I can use a VIP. On previous trips where I was on a DONE and my partner was on a D (U) award, we avoided AA for all international flights, even going so far as to change in Canada to be able to fly BA and get miles. On those trips, we were both in J and so wanted the carriers with the nicest J. On this trip, we want to be in F as much as possible.
Thanks for the information about the CX lounge food.
#12
Original Member

Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
Be aware that OW awards prohibit routing and airline changes -- only date changes are allowed. So you cannot switch from BA to CX on HKG-LHR on that OW award (even if award inventory is available). You would have to refund the award and issue a new award (hardly practical). I think the die is cast and your routing is locked in, given your constraints. Presuming you are in SAN, both of you could have flown BA J (to any of a dozen cities) and found it as good or better than AA F in terms of comfort. If you happened to choose one of the BA J+ routes (maybe they are all upgraded by your flight date), it would be superior to current AA F in terms of quality of food, wine and bed. Ironic isn't it that some J is superior to some F? You mention wanting to maximize the F experience, and my critique is that it is closer to being minimized than maximized (even QF is superior to BA on HKG-LHR so it really is the worst choice on that route, as is your LHR-USA leg).
#13
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 9,131

Presuming you are in SAN, both of you could have flown BA J (to any of a dozen cities) and found it as good or better than AA F in terms of comfort. If you happened to choose one of the BA J+ routes (maybe they are all upgraded by your flight date), it would be superior to current AA F in terms of quality of food, wine and bed. Ironic isn't it that some J is superior to some F? You mention wanting to maximize the F experience, and my critique is that it is closer to being minimized than maximized (even QF is superior to BA on HKG-LHR so it really is the worst choice on that route, as is your LHR-USA leg).
As for HKG-LHR, would your advice be to take CX as first choice, then QF, then BA?
Last edited by anabolism; Dec 24, 2007 at 8:08 pm
#14
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
It should also be noted that at least in the past, AM can be used for business-to-first upgrade on AA I fare, something that I believe could not be done using AAdvantage miles. So a few AM members, especially for MPC DM members, will value their AM miles quite a bit.
#15
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In Exile
Programs: QFF WP :-0, AC, FlyBuys, Porter's Liquor Store, Mother's Helper
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by anabolism
As for HKG-LHR, would your advice be to take CX as first choice, then QF, then BA?

