FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   CX - QF Comparison (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/694074-cx-qf-comparison.html)

PMMMColonel May 17, 2007 6:58 am

CX - QF Comparison
 
Can anyone share a recent comparison of CX and QF in Business Class? The segments cites in question are HKG- SYD and SYD and HKG?

IF you can choose which is better? What ate the advantages?

Thanks,

Viajero May 17, 2007 10:16 am

six to one, half a dozen to the other
 
I prefer QF in general, but on that route there is not enough difference between them, IMO, to make a clear cut choice one way or the other, so I just go for the one with the schedule that suits me better that day.

millionmiler May 17, 2007 11:22 am

Agree that they are interchangeable on that route. Similar seat comfort, similar food quality. I typically choose CX on that route because the flight I like gets into SYD just a bit earlier than the QF flight.

Dave Marsh May 17, 2007 5:06 pm

Schedule wise CX is better as there are triple daily flights.

QF has the 744 which I like on the UD.

Service wise CX is better IMO

Quantity of food = CX is slightly more.

CX's I Check is an excellent service where QF doesn't have.

It is a close call, but I generally like CX, also the chance of opup is higher!

simongr May 17, 2007 9:56 pm

I edge towards CX on this route. I prefer the Skybed (travelling alone I feel more isolated from the PAX net to me in the Skybed and it feels longer) but the food on CX is better, the G&T is better and the service is more welcoming.

The downside to me is the lack of points upgrades to F (as a QFF SG and AA Plat) in CX.

PMMMColonel May 18, 2007 7:52 am

Thank you for the feedback. I have learned that those who post hear really offer great advise and worth following.

I probably will use CX as it seems to be a toss up but a slight lean to them.

eireman May 18, 2007 8:33 am

Definitely prefer the Skybed over the CX J.

I think it is a long enough flight that seat comfort is #1.

That said AVOD on CX is among the best out there. So also depends on whether you plan to sleep or not.

I just flew QF/CX and BA on a Circle pacific and least liked the BA J seat- too narrow and you feel the need to use the privacy screen on BA which just make your space seem even smaller.
AVOD on CX the best- QF and BA about similar

seiknujnama May 18, 2007 12:24 pm

i travel with QF and CX both J class last Dec.Depart SYD by QF return by CX.

Its depend on what you need.

Because for CX they offer 3 routes a day while QF is only 2 routes.

For the food is similar but CX better because I am Asian people CX is more match me for the Asian food.

For the seat:If i have over night flight I will choose QF because CX seat is uncomfortable when seat is full flat I found all my body is slide lower and the armrest is fixed.

For the entertainment CX offer AVOD in all route while OF only in A330 aircraft

Overall I recommend take CX because the route and entertainment.

millionmiler May 18, 2007 3:12 pm


Originally Posted by eireman (Post 7758611)
Definitely prefer the Skybed over the CX J.

I think it is a long enough flight that seat comfort is #1.

That said AVOD on CX is among the best out there. So also depends on whether you plan to sleep or not.

I just flew QF/CX and BA on a Circle pacific and least liked the BA J seat- too narrow and you feel the need to use the privacy screen on BA which just make your space seem even smaller.
AVOD on CX the best- QF and BA about similar


I don't find the QF Skybed to be any more comfortable than the existing CX business class seat and I sit in both constantly. Lots of others seem to but I just don't get it.

I flew on the new BA J seat about 10 days ago JNB-LHR and it is an improvement.

QF NB May 18, 2007 6:35 pm


Originally Posted by irwin8417 (Post 7760004)
For the entertainment CX offer AVOD in all route while OF only in A330 aircraft

No, QF AVOD is available on all 747-400s as well (in addition to the A330-300s). QF127/128 SYD-HKG-SYD is operated by 747-400s.

seiknujnama May 19, 2007 4:25 am


Originally Posted by QF NB (Post 7761784)
No, QF AVOD is available on all 747-400s as well (in addition to the A330-300s). QF127/128 SYD-HKG-SYD is operated by 747-400s.

From http://www.qantas.com.au/info/flying/travelClasses/internationalBusiness

just read form website I think they already finish update on 747-400

i am unlucky last time i took the non-avod 744

simongr May 20, 2007 8:14 pm

Even if the QF aircraft has AVOD there is no guarantee that it will work oand teh selection is not as good as on CX I have found.

Viajero May 21, 2007 4:14 am


Originally Posted by simongr (Post 7769653)
Even if the QF aircraft has AVOD there is no guarantee that it will work...

LOL!

Reminds me of MAD-SCL-MAD on LA. Yes, the screen is there, and the AVOD is also there, but half the time or more all you get is a blank screen and a 'sorry about that' from the [nice] FA.

Nicc HK May 23, 2007 12:02 am

Cant go wrong with either
 
Its the one route where I can never quite decide between QF and CX in J. Both are excellent.

I tend to go for QF because I prefer the seats (if an overnighter) and because it makes a change from nearly always flying CX. I also like the do it yourself bar concept as well.

As for AVOD on QF in February worked fine on an A330-300. My only comment being QF and CX must source it from the same place as the English Channels for both TV and Radio were eerily similar. I even asked the Purser!

One thing you may consider I have a suspicion the Business Class FA's on Qantas are moonlighting from their regular somelier jobs. They tend to be very knowledgeble regarding Aussie wines!

ethan May 23, 2007 1:35 am


Originally Posted by Dave Marsh (Post 7755542)
CX's I Check is an excellent service where QF doesn't have.

What is I Check?

Cheers.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:15 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.