Iberia business class versus AA first class
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,085
Iberia business class versus AA first class
I am thinking of taking downgrade on a transatlantic portion of a 230K (25K miles) mile first class AAward.
The downgrade would be from
Drive TVC-GRR / AA GRR-DFW Coach / DFW-FRA first / FRA-MAD coach
AA TVC-ORD Coach / ORD-LGA first class / IB JFK-MAD business class.
Not only does this allow me to get to MAD a little earlier, but it opens up DFW for future connections.
Europe-Africa-Europe-America-Caribbean, etc. would still be in First Class
I know it is personal, but does anyone have opinions on this trade?
Is Iberia business class as good as AA business class?
The downgrade would be from
Drive TVC-GRR / AA GRR-DFW Coach / DFW-FRA first / FRA-MAD coach
AA TVC-ORD Coach / ORD-LGA first class / IB JFK-MAD business class.
Not only does this allow me to get to MAD a little earlier, but it opens up DFW for future connections.
Europe-Africa-Europe-America-Caribbean, etc. would still be in First Class
I know it is personal, but does anyone have opinions on this trade?
Is Iberia business class as good as AA business class?
#4
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott TE, Hhonors Dia
Posts: 263
The title of the post indicates a request for a comparison between AA F and IB J, but the post itself asks about AA J versus IB J.
IB J is, IMO, between AA J and AA F. As millionmiler noted, AA F is better than IB J. It would be difficult to argue against that. As Viajero noted, IB J is better than AA J. Some AA fans would probably argue that, but my preference is also IB.
DFW-FRA in F would be nice, but for a JFK-MAD flight, IB J is a good choice, especially as it is a better routing and opens up other options for you.
IB J is, IMO, between AA J and AA F. As millionmiler noted, AA F is better than IB J. It would be difficult to argue against that. As Viajero noted, IB J is better than AA J. Some AA fans would probably argue that, but my preference is also IB.
DFW-FRA in F would be nice, but for a JFK-MAD flight, IB J is a good choice, especially as it is a better routing and opens up other options for you.
#5




Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
FWIW, IB also runs ORD-MAD if you're interested. I don't know if it's the new or old seats, but IIRC, all North America routes have the new seats. Unless you're staying in NYC, I wouldn't bother going to NYC. Also, if you decide to pursue going to FRA, don't forget that LA runs three-class service FRA-MAD.
#6
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
#7
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,686
Admittedly, my F experiences are somewhat limited (MH, CX, AF, UA, AA), but out of those, I have to say the Flagship Suite....kicks posterior. AA's service clearly doesn't rival MH or CX, but the seat is miles ahead. And I'd classify AA's F service as being reasonable J by most standards 
In short, I wouldn't take the downgrade unless I really really thought I might need DFW.
Steve

In short, I wouldn't take the downgrade unless I really really thought I might need DFW.
Steve
#8


Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Admittedly, my F experiences are somewhat limited (MH, CX, AF, UA, AA), but out of those, I have to say the Flagship Suite....kicks posterior. AA's service clearly doesn't rival MH or CX, but the seat is miles ahead. And I'd classify AA's F service as being reasonable J by most standards 
In short, I wouldn't take the downgrade unless I really really thought I might need DFW.
Steve

In short, I wouldn't take the downgrade unless I really really thought I might need DFW.
Steve
IB's J seat is really good though. The service is not so great though at least on the ORD-MAD run that I often take.
#9




Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ireland
Programs: AA PLT 2MM, IHG Plat
Posts: 3,566
I flew the two to/from GRU two weeks ago and for me the answer is No!
However there is no "right" answer to this as it depends on what type of flyer you are. I use awards for leisure thus sleep isn't the issue so much as some nice food and drink and the feeling of luxury going on my holidays. Also I sleep soundly in pretty much any seat whether it's AA's J seats or even 31B or 31H in Y.
In increasing order what keeps me awake is
1) Excessive light (I have a trusty pair on LAN F eyeshades)
2) Excessive noise (AA's BOSE NCHs are the best IMO)
3) Hot cabins (AA's are cool, BA's are warm, IB's was like a blast furnace and it seems this is a common problem)
The food on IB was poor and worse than any I've received in AA J. This may have been a one-off as the food I got on the subsequent MAD-LHR flight was much better. Service was poor with pidgin English used by all but one FA. I don't speak Spanish well but I thought on a Brasil-Spain flight I could have used portuguese but none of the FAs could it seemed. The seat is good but the stifling temperature meant I only slept for a couple of hours despite not having got any sleep the previous night. The AVOD was very good and thus for a day flight IB would be a good choice.
The food on AA was good (though not as nice as on the preceding EI flight). The cabin was cool, dark and quiet and I slept for a solid 5 hours, waking up refreshed. ^
Disclaimer : This was my first flight on IB J after dozens on AA J. I approached it with an open mind given the positive reviews on here but I haven't been as disappointed with a flight since one on BA F in 2003. I fly IB again next month to GIG and am hoping for a more positive experience.
For more on IB J I think this trip report gives a terrific feel for the service aboard although the poster was positive about it.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=642928
As for the main question I would pick the flight that suits my times and routing needs best.
However there is no "right" answer to this as it depends on what type of flyer you are. I use awards for leisure thus sleep isn't the issue so much as some nice food and drink and the feeling of luxury going on my holidays. Also I sleep soundly in pretty much any seat whether it's AA's J seats or even 31B or 31H in Y.
In increasing order what keeps me awake is1) Excessive light (I have a trusty pair on LAN F eyeshades)
2) Excessive noise (AA's BOSE NCHs are the best IMO)
3) Hot cabins (AA's are cool, BA's are warm, IB's was like a blast furnace and it seems this is a common problem)
The food on IB was poor and worse than any I've received in AA J. This may have been a one-off as the food I got on the subsequent MAD-LHR flight was much better. Service was poor with pidgin English used by all but one FA. I don't speak Spanish well but I thought on a Brasil-Spain flight I could have used portuguese but none of the FAs could it seemed. The seat is good but the stifling temperature meant I only slept for a couple of hours despite not having got any sleep the previous night. The AVOD was very good and thus for a day flight IB would be a good choice.
The food on AA was good (though not as nice as on the preceding EI flight). The cabin was cool, dark and quiet and I slept for a solid 5 hours, waking up refreshed. ^
Disclaimer : This was my first flight on IB J after dozens on AA J. I approached it with an open mind given the positive reviews on here but I haven't been as disappointed with a flight since one on BA F in 2003. I fly IB again next month to GIG and am hoping for a more positive experience.
For more on IB J I think this trip report gives a terrific feel for the service aboard although the poster was positive about it.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=642928
As for the main question I would pick the flight that suits my times and routing needs best.
#10
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
I really believe this is a big part of the "bad service" we hear so often here in FT about IB. My wife and I have flown IB for several decades (yup) and can honestly say the service in the air, for the two of us, has been, overall, very good. The FAs, the purser, have almost always come around to us to chat, to ask what we want, to talk about Real Madrid or whatever "local" issue is current, etc., and they have been almost invariably friendly and pleasant to us. However, as an experienced flyer I also observe and notice that the same friendly staff that treat us well does indeed take a different, cooler, almost indifferent approach when dealing with non-Spanish pax. So, IMO this is part of IB's problem, and as an international airline there is no excuse for it. I hope one day they address this issue but it hasn't changed in more than 30 years so I'm not hopeful.
#11
Original Member

Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
I really believe this is a big part of the "bad service" we hear so often here in FT about IB. My wife and I have flown IB for several decades (yup) and can honestly say the service in the air, for the two of us, has been, overall, very good. The FAs, the purser, have almost always come around to us to chat, to ask what we want, to talk about Real Madrid or whatever "local" issue is current, etc., and they have been almost invariably friendly and pleasant to us. However, as an experienced flyer I also observe and notice that the same friendly staff that treat us well does indeed take a different, cooler, almost indifferent approach when dealing with non-Spanish pax. So, IMO this is part of IB's problem, and as an international airline there is no excuse for it. I hope one day they address this issue but it hasn't changed in more than 30 years so I'm not hopeful.
For the current IB J+ service, I've found catering to be mediocre on board (not as good as the Air Nostrum food served on 1 hour RJ flights, by way of comparison!). Really strange as it could be a lot better with the same money but smarter menu composition. For example some of their dishes dry out -- maybe due to overheating by the FAs, but lots of ways to fix this. IB hasn't done it, perhaps out of ignorance. Clearly trying to invest to create a really good product, and some of it works (the seats) and some of it needs a lot of improvement. The potential is there to have a great airline, but at the moment it is below average overall.
#12




Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ireland
Programs: AA PLT 2MM, IHG Plat
Posts: 3,566
On a more positive note, the wine (not the Cava) was good and I liked the amenity kit with an emphasis on useful items as opposed to beauty products. As with EI's kit it included a small bottle of mouthwash which is also useful for future weekend trips with the new liquid restrictions.
As an aside I was really surprised by EI's service on DUB-BOS. Not only was it overall the best J meal I've ever had, the crystal glasses and classy L'Occitane kit give the flight a real luxury feel. However it was a day flight and I can understand how the seat is considered substandard for night flights. I suspect that the average for both carriers lies somewhere in between my two experiences and it may be fairer to judge when I've flown IB ex-MAD and EI ex-US.
#13




Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ireland
Programs: AA PLT 2MM, IHG Plat
Posts: 3,566
Based on these two flights I'd agree. The LH menu looked delicious on paper but wasn't whereas the SH food was good and better than CE on BA e.g. the SH dessert (mousse on carrot sponge) was as good as the LH mango cake was bad.
#14
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
#15
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,686
Through about 2003 those kinds of things epitomized Premier...but since then it seems to be more...mundane (aside from the crystal, of course).
Steve

