Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

DONE4 - Any suggestions?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

DONE4 - Any suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 5:33 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ADL
Programs: QF WP, QP Life, LT Gold, AA, DL
Posts: 142
Question DONE4 - Any suggestions?

Am thinking of doing a DONE4 later this year. Does anyone have any suggestions or improvements for the following? (Am a Plat QFF after my last DONE4 in Jan - thanks to all who helped with that one also)

ADL/DRW/MEL/NRT/HKG/KUL/HKG/LHR/LED/LHR/IST/LHR/LAX/SJU/EWR/ORD/
LNK/ORD/LAX/SYD/ADL.

Actual Miles: 47435
QF SC 1500

The actual destination is LNK. This itinerary is the max 20 segments. The ADL-LNK sectors will be over 20 days. I didn't think that I could face doing a turn around in DXB or Karachi (I know, I know, call me weak!) and LED and IST sound interesting. I decided not to buy the ORD/LNK/ORD as a separate ticket because the DONE4 should give me enought flexibility make date changes if I need to with short notice which a cheap ticket will not.

Thanks for all the tips on the board that I've picked up already.

Medicus
medicus is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 7:49 am
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
It looks like a valid itinerary to me. In terms of improvements it depends what you are trying to achieve. For pure miles there are a few improvements possible...

In Asia you could replace KUL with CMB which others have reported as a relatively painless turnaround (or DPS/CGK).
ORD-JFK-SYD is more base miles than ORD-LAX-SYD although I guess maybe not so good if you can do the AA sector in First whereas the JFK-SYD would be in D all the way. You have the same problem with the SJU flights. You get miles for D, not A.
christep is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 8:36 am
  #3  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ADL
Programs: QF WP, QP Life, LT Gold, AA, DL
Posts: 142
"ORD-JFK-SYD is more base miles than ORD-LAX-SYD although I guess maybe not so good if you can do the AA sector in First whereas the JFK-SYD would be in D all the way."

Thank you. That's an interesting idea. @:-) Do you know if it would be legal given that I would have already done the one allowable transcontinental trip (LAX-SJU)? Do they realise that NYC-SYD is via LAX and so I would in effect be doing two transcons?

There's one way to find out I suppose...
medicus is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 8:46 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
The segments are origin/destination regardless of whether they are direct or non-stop. In other words, there is a distinct difference between JFK-LAX-SYD and JFK-SYD via LAX. The first counts as two segments and one would be considered your transcon. The other is one segment and it is not considered your transcon irrespective of whether it goes through Los Angeles.

The short answer to your concern is that JFK-SYD is not considered a transcon flight. Do keep in mind, however, that it does not run every day whereas the LAX flight does.
Darren is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 2:23 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
150 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SE1, London & White River, South Africa
Posts: 24,628
Are you planning a turnaround in LED? You will still need a visa...and if you don't have one you will almost certainly be denied boarding at LHR. DXB would be an easier option!
Swanhunter is online now  
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 11:33 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: HEL, Finland
Programs: AY Plat, SK Silver, FB Gold
Posts: 604
Swanhunter is right about LED and the visa. It's the duty of the transporation provider to check that the traveller has a valid passport and visa for Russia before starting the journey (either by air/sea/rail/bus). If you want to stay inside Europe (and not try DXB) go to IST or HEL.
JuPe is offline  
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 8:30 am
  #7  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ADL
Programs: QF WP, QP Life, LT Gold, AA, DL
Posts: 142
Thanks.

I am actually planning to spend a couple of days in LED, so would have to get a visa anyway. I have been to DXB and stayed for few days (One of my sisters used to live there) and I have no desire to return there any time soon. I thought that LED would be an interesting place to visit and do some sightseeing. Now if I can just find a cheap hotel...
medicus is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 12:16 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: HEL, Finland
Programs: AY Plat, SK Silver, FB Gold
Posts: 604
Remember that summer time in St Petersburg is very popular and although hotel situation is getting better all the time, accomodation might sometimes be a problem. For St Petersburg's accomodation, I would use the service of a travel agent. I wouldn't go for the cheapest place because it might be in the suburbs (even if the subway system is good, you might have to walk a lot). Hotel St Petersburg and Moskva are among the most popular ones for mid-budget tourists.

Also remember that Pulkovo airport isn't the most accessible place, even if it looks like it's near a subway station. The taxi's at Pulkovo will be charging much more than normal taxis downtown.

For sightseeing, I would recommend boat trips on the canals. Also remember that museum entrance fees for tourist are higher than for locals. Sometimes it's better to have a pre-arranged sightseeing.
JuPe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.