Comparing Oneworld PE services

Old Nov 17, 17, 6:37 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 972
Comparing Oneworld PE services

How would you compare the Premium Economy products offered by BA, CX & QF? In terms of seat comfort, food & wine etc.
puchong is offline  
Old Nov 17, 17, 6:50 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,295
JL also has PE and AA is starting to install it on international flights.
Himeno is offline  
Old Nov 22, 17, 3:14 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 1,921
Seat comfortable sees all about the same... JL seat pitch is better.
Ausriver is offline  
Old Nov 22, 17, 4:25 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DEN, LAS, SIN
Programs: AA CK
Posts: 931
JL,QF and AA are on pair in terms of overall PE quality, BA and CX are lacking due to older cabins imho.
ckx2 is offline  
Old Nov 22, 17, 4:25 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: GRU
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by Ausriver View Post
Seat comfortable sees all about the same... JL seat pitch is better.
Agree that most PE seats are similar (i have flown BA, CX and AA seats). The BA old PE seat (still installed on their 772s and some 747s) is significantly worse though in my opinion. Also note that IB has started rolling out PE seats as well.
mzb00 is offline  
Old Nov 23, 17, 6:54 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 14,202
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11947510
Mwenenzi is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread