Which carrier LHR-JFK?
#1
Original Poster
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
Which carrier LHR-JFK?
WIll be posting a link to this thread in the EI, AA, BA and QF (since I am a QF member) fora, since I wish to get as wide a cross-section of opinion as possible.
(That is one of the problems with this format of BB, cross-posting isn't possible).
Will be in London in October 2004, and whilst there will need to pop over to JFK for 3-4 days. No restrictions as to when regarding specific flights, so am totally flexible as to who I fly with and which carriers - obviously, it will need to be on oneworld.
As an aviation enthusiast, I think the best part of the flights are taking off and landing - the g-forces just do something to me, I love it!
(Of course the SC's earnt from the additional sectors don't go unnoticed either!
)
So, bearing in mind all of the above, I am tempted to fly on EI from LHR to JFK, since it will mean flying to DUB and transferring onto a flight from DUB to JFK - which if I choose the right flight will go via SNN.
Only thing is that it is ages since I have flown on EI, and I can't recall what they are like.
AA is attractive, because of their propensity to upgrade anyone as long as there is a 'Y' in the day. BUT, if no upgrade is forthcoming, then I do NOT want to be in Y on AA on any sector - I do NOT want to pay for drinks.

So I suppose it will come down to EI or BA, with an emphasis on in-flight service.
I look forward to your sageful advice.
Dave
(That is one of the problems with this format of BB, cross-posting isn't possible).
Will be in London in October 2004, and whilst there will need to pop over to JFK for 3-4 days. No restrictions as to when regarding specific flights, so am totally flexible as to who I fly with and which carriers - obviously, it will need to be on oneworld.
As an aviation enthusiast, I think the best part of the flights are taking off and landing - the g-forces just do something to me, I love it!

(Of course the SC's earnt from the additional sectors don't go unnoticed either!
)So, bearing in mind all of the above, I am tempted to fly on EI from LHR to JFK, since it will mean flying to DUB and transferring onto a flight from DUB to JFK - which if I choose the right flight will go via SNN.
Only thing is that it is ages since I have flown on EI, and I can't recall what they are like.
AA is attractive, because of their propensity to upgrade anyone as long as there is a 'Y' in the day. BUT, if no upgrade is forthcoming, then I do NOT want to be in Y on AA on any sector - I do NOT want to pay for drinks.

So I suppose it will come down to EI or BA, with an emphasis on in-flight service.
I look forward to your sageful advice.
Dave
#2



Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 611
We always use BA, chiefly because
(a) we're used to it
(b) we often fly JFK-LHR on a red eye, in which case going thru Ireland is less fun (from memory, gives less time to sleep) and BA has seemed to be a little cheaper than AA when i've checked
(c) for the daytime LHR-JFK flight, food and IFE is sufficiently good even in WT (occasionally WT+) (and we usually take books)
(a) we're used to it
(b) we often fly JFK-LHR on a red eye, in which case going thru Ireland is less fun (from memory, gives less time to sleep) and BA has seemed to be a little cheaper than AA when i've checked
(c) for the daytime LHR-JFK flight, food and IFE is sufficiently good even in WT (occasionally WT+) (and we usually take books)
#3




Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane (BNE), Australia, QF/VA Forums Meeting Organiser
Programs: VA Plat, QF LTG (18.7% LTP), QP Life, AA (66% LTG). HH Silver. Amex Plat, Visa Plat
Posts: 6,558
Dave, watch it - EI leave from Gates 85 and 86 at LHR, IIRC..the furthest Gates from the Lounges (having done it on my honeymoon trip) and EI is notorious for being late (both of our flights LHR/DUB and DUB/LHR were late - the latter was 2.5 hours late).
I'd second aura's suggestion..I'd only fly BA - although you won't get auto-op upped to WT+ anymore
I'd second aura's suggestion..I'd only fly BA - although you won't get auto-op upped to WT+ anymore
#4
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA, BD, AF, LH, AA, EK, Hilton, ICHG, SPG
Posts: 1,500
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by thadocta:
WIll be posting a link to this thread in the EI, AA, BA and QF ...</font>
WIll be posting a link to this thread in the EI, AA, BA and QF ...</font>
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: May 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,588
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by christep:
Consider also IB via MAD (but not for long) </font>
Consider also IB via MAD (but not for long) </font>
#8
Original Member

Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
EI has excellent trans-Atlantic J service with great food and the irish whiskey flows like water....I imagine this would also be true in Y. The EI crews are young and very friendly, quite a change from normal Oneworld trans-Atlantic standard.
#9
Join Date: Aug 2001
Programs: AA Plat & LTG; QF LTG
Posts: 9,837
Dave, given your requirements, and the changes to the QF points earning on BA and AA after 1 Jan, I would seriously consider AY via HEL.
The downside, for a QP regular, is that the AY flight LHR-HEL departs from T1, so no F lounge. But as a SG you will have access to the BA Exec Lounge even when flying AY and the bar is open! Nice little AY lounge in HEL.
AY were very good to me and the family in Y. Food and service were quite acceptible.
Oh yes, the A319/320 LHR-HEL will likely show the takeoff and landing on the drop-down screens from a camera in the front undercarriage - great to see if you have seen before. I am not sure if AY do this on the MD11 aircraft they use HEL-JFK. And you get to fly on another aircraft type not common in Australia - the MD11.
The downside, for a QP regular, is that the AY flight LHR-HEL departs from T1, so no F lounge. But as a SG you will have access to the BA Exec Lounge even when flying AY and the bar is open! Nice little AY lounge in HEL.
AY were very good to me and the family in Y. Food and service were quite acceptible.
Oh yes, the A319/320 LHR-HEL will likely show the takeoff and landing on the drop-down screens from a camera in the front undercarriage - great to see if you have seen before. I am not sure if AY do this on the MD11 aircraft they use HEL-JFK. And you get to fly on another aircraft type not common in Australia - the MD11.
#10
Original Member

Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by christep:
I believe that the AY J wine list is one of the best out there.</font>
I believe that the AY J wine list is one of the best out there.</font>
#11
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, ex-BD Gold, SPG Gold, HH Gold
Posts: 2,041
I would actually put in a good word for AA. Their schedule LHR-JFK is outstanding in both directions (especially since the recent reinstatement of 8 PM LHR-JFK departure, allowing one to work a full day in London and still go to bed in NYC by midnight). I find that the 6:30 & 8 PM westbound and 7-9 PM departures eastbound departures are very good for jet lag on the long weekends in Eastern time, though this might just be my own internal body clock. The J product might be inferior, but the Y product is very good. While paying for drinks is a bit of a disappointment, if one is in Y don't underestimate a) MRTC, and b) elites on AA can pre-select exit row seats. To me, this is more than enough compensation for the occasional $5 for a drink.
If NYC is the final destination, I also don't see why one would want to connect unnecessarily through DUB or anywhere else just for a free drink.
You could wait for CX to start service....
[This message has been edited by chalf (edited Dec 13, 2003).]
If NYC is the final destination, I also don't see why one would want to connect unnecessarily through DUB or anywhere else just for a free drink.
You could wait for CX to start service....
[This message has been edited by chalf (edited Dec 13, 2003).]

