Why no codeshare on AA flights ATL-BNA?
Nov 13, 2003 | 5:07 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: ATL/MDW/ORD
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 590
Why no codeshare on AA flights ATL-BNA?
Anybody have any idea why BA hasn't gotten AA to make their ATL-BNA flights codeshared? If you are in Nashville and want to fly to LGW on oneworld carriers, then going through Atlanta would be your shortest routing. As it stands, the only routings on a single Oneworld ticket involve backtracking to one of AA's midwest hubs or traveling south to Miami. I know that the BNA-ATL is turboprop only, but it seems like it would save a lot more time. Anybody have any insight on this?
Nov 14, 2003 | 12:50 am
#2
Join Date: May 2001
Programs: AA PLT 2MM, LH SEN *, HH Gold
Posts: 3,075
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by yorock:
Anybody have any idea why BA hasn't gotten AA to make their ATL-BNA flights codeshared? If you are in Nashville and want to fly to LGW on oneworld carriers, then going through Atlanta would be your shortest routing. As it stands, the only routings on a single Oneworld ticket involve backtracking to one of AA's midwest hubs or traveling south to Miami. I know that the BNA-ATL is turboprop only, but it seems like it would save a lot more time. Anybody have any insight on this? </font>
Anybody have any idea why BA hasn't gotten AA to make their ATL-BNA flights codeshared? If you are in Nashville and want to fly to LGW on oneworld carriers, then going through Atlanta would be your shortest routing. As it stands, the only routings on a single Oneworld ticket involve backtracking to one of AA's midwest hubs or traveling south to Miami. I know that the BNA-ATL is turboprop only, but it seems like it would save a lot more time. Anybody have any insight on this? </font>