Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cathay to PEK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 8:31 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Springfield
Posts: 34
Cathay to PEK

Cathay will fly to PEK from Dec 2 and more flights into China to come.
HomersfriendCarl is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 10:59 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: HEL, Finland
Programs: AY Plat, SK Silver, FB Gold
Posts: 604
Good news for OWE and Global Explorer flyers! However the schedules don't match at all with AY's HEL-PEK flights.
JuPe is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 12:20 am
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
Why would you (or CX) want them to? CX already codeshares to HEL via LHR on BA. And AY already flies direct to HKG (via BKK).

[This message has been edited by christep (edited 10-22-2003).]
christep is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 12:31 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: HEL, Finland
Programs: AY Plat, SK Silver, FB Gold
Posts: 604
Until now if you fly on a OWE or Global Explorer, it has been almost impossible to visit PEK and continue to other Asian destinations or Australia with an OW carrier.
JuPe is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 1:14 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Programs: A variety of precious-metal themed cards; MUCCI
Posts: 602
Don't get too excited - the initial service is only thrice-weekly, so availability for A and D classes will probably be very limited.

There is speculation in the press that Cathay really wants to use its new route rights in China to blackmail Dragonair to codeshare on its flights. Apparently CX can make more money that way. This would be bad news (OWE tickets are invalid on codeshare flights), unless of course Dragonair also joined OneWorld...
J-Class is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 4:15 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
>>> JuPe
I understand it's good for visiting PEK on ONE/GLOB fares. What I don't understand is your comment on aligning schedules with AY. In what way would you like to see them aligned?

[This message has been edited by christep (edited 10-22-2003).]
christep is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 8:06 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: HEL, Finland
Programs: AY Plat, SK Silver, FB Gold
Posts: 604
I just tought that aligning schedules would make it possible to fly fast from HEL to HKG via PEK (5164 miles) almost every day and not just 3x a week on AY's flight via BKK (5945 miles). Flying via LHR is also longer (7146 miles).
JuPe is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 9:19 am
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
But if you're flying on CX longer is better
christep is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:52 am
  #9  
Original Member
30 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: HKG
Programs: BA GGL, CX DM, AA LT GO, Marriott LT Titanium, Shangri-La DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM
Posts: 2,030
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by J-Class:
Don't get too excited - the initial service is only thrice-weekly, so availability for A and D classes will probably be very limited.</font>
I think we don't even have to worry about A class availability yet, because it seems like they are operating with the 2-class version of the 330...

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">There is speculation in the press that Cathay really wants to use its new route rights in China to blackmail Dragonair to codeshare on its flights. Apparently CX can make more money that way. This would be bad news (OWE tickets are invalid on codeshare flights), unless of course Dragonair also joined OneWorld...</font>
interesting...because what I read a few months ago was, when CX was applying for their own rights to fly, KA was actually trying to get CX to codeshare with KA instead, because KA already has a well-established network and operations there...but CX insisted to get its own plane fly there...
tedhl is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 10:05 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,027
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by J-Class:
Cathay really wants to use its new route rights in China to blackmail Dragonair to codeshare on its flights. </font>
I would be very surprised if this was the case. CX is flying to China because KA against original intentions and through some very Beijing-connected political favor-trading has been allowed to compete on Asian routes. CX was outmanoevered and at one time almost sold its stake in KA. THey are increasingly cose with MU for the same reason. Codeshare has been on and off the table, KA offered it in spring to avoid CX flying in China, as has been said above.

mhtaipei is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 12:04 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LAX, HKG
Programs: AA EXPLT, BA Gold, Shang Elite
Posts: 2,228
code share is just a marketing gimmick.

no airline really bother about code-sharing if it can get flying right. so it is illogical for any airline to trade traffic right for code share.
pegasus8228 is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 5:11 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 15,852
Perhaps that applies for Chine, but not the rest of the world. I can cite dozens of examples where a carrier drops service to a destination because it does not have enough traffic, but enters a codeshare so it can still try to retain some of its passengers.
hfly is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 6:47 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 38
Im stuck because I am a OneWorld addict but think that Dragonairs First class is the best for short (under 5 hour) flights Ive ever experienced.If CX go two class though wont match.Even if they went three class its hard to imagine them bettering Dragonair.

What to do? Its a challenge now because I do HKG PEK occasionally but will be a big question if they ever add Shanghai which Im going to be doing regularly.
ponchodiaz is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 1:58 pm
  #14  
Original Member
30 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: HKG
Programs: BA GGL, CX DM, AA LT GO, Marriott LT Titanium, Shangri-La DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM
Posts: 2,030
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ponchodiaz:
Im stuck because I am a OneWorld addict but think that Dragonairs First class is the best for short (under 5 hour) flights Ive ever experienced.If CX go two class though wont match.Even if they went three class its hard to imagine them bettering Dragonair.

What to do? Its a challenge now because I do HKG PEK occasionally but will be a big question if they ever add Shanghai which Im going to be doing regularly.
</font>
I agree, personally I do enjoy KA's service much more than CX's in general...have been flying KA roundtrips HKG-PVG or HKG-PEK every week for the past whole year...

For me, I will definitely still go with KA as much as possible (even after I requalify for KA Platinum soon)...using CX maybe only near year-end when I need some oneworld miles to top-off my account for renewing oneworld status...otherwise, for me it will be quite an easy decision...
tedhl is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 6:38 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LAX, HKG
Programs: AA EXPLT, BA Gold, Shang Elite
Posts: 2,228
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by hfly:
Perhaps that applies for Chine, but not the rest of the world. I can cite dozens of examples where a carrier drops service to a destination because it does not have enough traffic, but enters a codeshare so it can still try to retain some of its passengers.</font>
yes, you r right to the point. the assumption here is that HKG-PEK is a very profitable route, in fact hkg-pek and hkg-pvg probably contribute 2/3 of KA's profit.
i think the only route that is more lucrative in this region is probably hkg-tpe. (which might be the most profitable in the world).

however, i think once you get the right to fly, u can change it to code-share (instead of forcing a negotiation position for code-share? -- from the regulatory perspsective...i am not sure)


[This message has been edited by pegasus8228 (edited 11-02-2003).]
pegasus8228 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.