OW Electronic Timetable
Jul 11, 2001 | 11:17 pm
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA Silver, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 23,164
OW Electronic Timetable
Star Alliance has a pretty good electronic timetable developed by Goldenware (same people who developed the AA Electronic Timetable).
Do you know of anything similar for OneWorld? I have tried Cathay's, but I'm not too fond of it. For example, it says the only two DEN-SYD flights possible involved 12-13 hour layovers in LAX. Whereas the AA ET gives me more "proper" flights.
I have yet to find anything better, and I doubt I will.
Cheers,
Lawrence
Do you know of anything similar for OneWorld? I have tried Cathay's, but I'm not too fond of it. For example, it says the only two DEN-SYD flights possible involved 12-13 hour layovers in LAX. Whereas the AA ET gives me more "proper" flights.
I have yet to find anything better, and I doubt I will.
Cheers,
Lawrence
Jul 11, 2001 | 11:52 pm
#2
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: HKG
Programs: BA GGL, CX DM, AA LT GO, Marriott LT Titanium, Shangri-La DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM
Posts: 2,030
i'm not sure what date you are looking at, but just now when i tried the CX travel planner did give me quite "proper" flights for DEN-SYD...with a connection time of 90 minutes or 4.5 hours...
if they don't show it, maybe probably it just means that there is really no flights that match your schedule on that day ?personally i like the CX one better because it does give me a lot of connection options that i otherwise would not think of...
if they don't show it, maybe probably it just means that there is really no flights that match your schedule on that day ?personally i like the CX one better because it does give me a lot of connection options that i otherwise would not think of...
Jul 12, 2001 | 2:56 am
#3
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LAX, HKG
Programs: AA EXPLT, BA Gold, Shang Elite
Posts: 2,228
the CX timetable is based on OAG.
therefore, it is a lot better at showing point-to-point.
i have found it good enough to use.
but sometimes you need to know the minimal geography to make better use of it -- but it is elementary school geography....
therefore, it is a lot better at showing point-to-point.
i have found it good enough to use.
but sometimes you need to know the minimal geography to make better use of it -- but it is elementary school geography....