![]() |
is this a valid routing ex JNB
hi
i'm new to routings ex SA and having read the OW Rules I thought that this routing was possible .... I've given the bare bones - the area of contention is at the end JNB-HKG-SYD-WLG-SYD-HKG-JFK-LAX-LHRxNBO-LHR-JNB The online booking tool doesn't let me do the final flights via LHR - says only allowed one intercontinental arrival and departure I thought that this routing was possible as long as one of the 2 LHR visits was transit only Or have I not understood the rules correctly Thanks! |
Originally Posted by pianoperson
(Post 19770091)
hi
i'm new to routings ex SA and having read the OW Rules I thought that this routing was possible .... I've given the bare bones - the area of contention is at the end JNB-HKG-SYD-WLG-SYD-HKG-JFK-LAX-LHRxNBO-LHR-JNB The online booking tool doesn't let me do the final flights via LHR - says only allowed one intercontinental arrival and departure I thought that this routing was possible as long as one of the 2 LHR visits was transit only Or have I not understood the rules correctly Thanks! You are wanting to visit Africa too many times - start there (JNB) - make a visit to NBO from Europe and return to Europe - end there (back to JNB) You cannot do that - the general rule is: Only one intercontinental departure and one intercontinental arrival permitted in each continent I reported this in the tool bugs thread a short time ago The rule the tool should allow is: For travel to/from or via Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya and Uganda two permitted in Europe when one is a transfer without stopover between Ghana/Nigeria/Kenya/Uganda and another continent. The tool gives the error message when you are returning to Europe from NBO - which is the bug. But in any case your further segments NBO-LHR-JNB are not allowed because (i) you're leaving and arriving back into Africa a second time and (ii) the transit is not to another continent as required by the rules - it is back to Africa |
hi
thanks for that i can see it clearly now - the crucial bit - another continent ! cheers |
Originally Posted by pianoperson
(Post 19770215)
hi
thanks for that i can see it clearly now - the crucial bit - another continent ! cheers |
Originally Posted by pianoperson
(Post 19770091)
hi
i'm new to routings ex SA and having read the OW Rules I thought that this routing was possible .... I've given the bare bones - the area of contention is at the end JNB-HKG-SYD-WLG-SYD-HKG-JFK-LAX-LHRxNBO-LHR-JNB |
Originally Posted by deconz
(Post 19775428)
You also can't visit Asia twice either!!! Suggest ... HKG-SYD-WLG-SYD-JFK ...
The allowed exception is: Two permitted in Asia when one is a transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe See also the recent discussion on the exception, in this thread |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 19776070)
Yes s/he can. The allowed exception is:
Two permitted in Asia when one is a transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe JNB-HKG-SYD-WLG-SYD-HKG-JFK-LAX-LHRxNBO-LHR-JNB |
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 19779386)
You've quoted the rule accurately, Pandaperth, but where's the service between SWP and Europe?
First pass through HKG is between Africa and SWP; second is between SWP and North America. Here is a copy of part of the post I made in the thread I referred to in my post above
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 19753092)
From time to time the interpretation of this exception by airlines has flip-flopped between:
YMMV I guess! |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 19779555)
I reported that I had successfully ticketed with AA an itinerary where the transfer without stopover was between Nth America and SWP; and the OP of that other thread later reported that CX has ticketed her/his itinerary where the transfer is between Africa and SWP.
YMMV I guess! The official rule, 4(e)2, says: 2. Two permitted in Asia when one is a transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe. |
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 19779712)
...Back when cheapest point of purchase was MRU, I bought several AONE4s which started at MRU and ended at JNB/CPT or vice versa. (Under the interpretation of the rules used by BA at MRU, you couldn't start and end at the same point. If you started at MRU, you could end at JNB or CPT. Start at JNB/CPT and you could end at MRU.) All included two transits of LHR, clearly not allowed by the rules. ... |
Why not, JNB-SYD-WLG-SYD-HKG-LHR-NBO-LHR-JNB? or the more adventurous JNB-SYD-WLG-HKG-NRT-JFK-LHR-NBO-LHR-JNB?
|
Originally Posted by Yoshi212
(Post 19784854)
Why not, JNB-SYD-WLG-SYD-HKG-LHR-NBO-LHR-JNB? or the more adventurous JNB-SYD-WLG-HKG-NRT-JFK-LHR-NBO-LHR-JNB?
JNB-SYD-WLG-HKG-NRT-JFK-LHR-NBO-LHR-JNB has the same problems wrt African entries/exits. No direct service WLG-HKG (though there is AKL-HKG). More adventurous?:confused: |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 19785026)
More adventurous?:confused:
|
Originally Posted by pianoperson
(Post 19770091)
hi
i'm new to routings ex SA Just a very minor quibble: "SA" can be ambiguous (the 'A' might be Africa, America, or even Asia). Since you posted your routing it's clear here of course.
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 19776070)
Yes s/he can.
The allowed exception is: Two permitted in Asia when one is a transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe Two permitted in Asia when (one is a transfer without stopover) or (on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe[) or Two permitted in Asia when one is a (transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service) between the Southwest Pacific and Europe |
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 19785462)
Is the rule
Two permitted in Asia when (one is a transfer without stopover) or (on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe[) or Two permitted in Asia when one is a (transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service) between the Southwest Pacific and Europe and also the thread I linked to in post #6 |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:34 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.