Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Sri Lankan to join oneworld

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Sri Lankan to join oneworld

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2012, 9:44 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 382
Sri Lankan to join oneworld

Deleted

Last edited by ThomasBne; Jun 28, 2019 at 5:27 am Reason: deleted
ThomasBne is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2012, 10:58 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
Hmmm...a mixed bag. UL has 3-stars in SKYTRAX, and their J-class is configured as a regional J albeit with AVOD; however, it's being upgraded to horizontal lie-flat. Their network doesn't really add a whole lot (certainly not a replacement for IT), but any little bit helps.

Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, it's 43.6% owned and is managed by Emirates, which will now be able to directly measure the value of oneworld.
hillrider is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2012, 11:12 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 21,026
http://www.srilankan.com/en_uk/

Originally Posted by hillrider
Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, it's 43.6% owned and is managed by Emirates, which will now be able to directly measure the value of oneworld.
The OW site press release states as "SriLankan Airlines is majority owned by the Sri Lankan government and state-owned institutions".
8 Jul 2010 http://www.srilankanewstoday.com/news.php?newsid=1737
The Government has become the sole owner of SriLankan Airlines as it has purchased all shares of the Emirates recently.

The Government has purchased 43 percent of shares from Emirates and its share ownership has increased to 94.6 percent. The balance 5.4 percent shares belong to the SriLankan Airlines employees.
< snip>
Wikipedia is never a reliable source.

See today's post on the http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...er-merged.html

Last edited by Mwenenzi; Jun 10, 2012 at 11:37 pm
Mwenenzi is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 12:13 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
I wonder with UL joining if they add Sri Lanka to the xASnn which currently doesn't permit areas west of Thailand (Australia, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam).
Himeno is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 12:55 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: All over
Programs: Most
Posts: 10,839
I think that it is a good choice. UL has PVG/PEK/CAN/HKG as a fifth free routes from BKK. They also operate MOW-DXB and KUL-SIN.

Last year I had six segments in business on UL. Their STPC experience and my flight PEK-BKK were both good.
holtju2 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 1:14 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Diamond (OW Emerald), former SQ Krisflyer Gold
Posts: 2,527
UL is a somewhat baffling choice, especially for CX to sponsor as they compete directly with CX on a few routes. I'm not quite sure what value this adds to OW either. Other than connecting South India & Sri Lanka to OW, what's the big idea?

Are these markets even important?

I'm sure there must be some logic in there somewhere, just that I can't seem to find it.

It's hardly a drop in replacement for IT - if that was the original plan. Usually I'd say the more carriers the merrier, but I don't know what value this really brings to OW
midlevels is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 1:16 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pune, India
Programs: United MilagePlus Premier Gold, Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 29
Hopefully they start flying to PNQ to get valuable feed for long haul operations.
tejasjog is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 2:06 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Diamond (OW Emerald), former SQ Krisflyer Gold
Posts: 2,527
Originally Posted by tejasjog
Hopefully they start flying to PNQ to get valuable feed for long haul operations.
PNQ-CMB-Europe is a very unlikely routing which involves heavy backtracking. It would make more sense to fly domestic to BOM/DEL and then onwards.
midlevels is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 2:33 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: used to be PER, now it's nowhere/eveywhere
Programs: QFF NB, AA GLD
Posts: 3,467
Originally Posted by Himeno
I wonder with UL joining if they add Sri Lanka to the xASnn which currently doesn't permit areas west of Thailand (Australia, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam).
Also with the xCIRnn which currently has the same retriction

But since there are OW flights to CMB already (flown by CX), maybe there won't be a change. In any case UL won't be joining until late 2013, so I won't be holding my breath!
pandaperth is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 3:16 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
Originally Posted by pandaperth
But since there are OW flights to CMB already (flown by CX)....
And RJ plus oneworld candidate-member MH.
Austinrunner is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 4:38 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,741
Originally Posted by hillrider
Their network doesn't really add a whole lot (certainly not a replacement for IT), but any little bit helps.
I love how they put Belfast and Edinburgh as offshore airports somewhere north of their respective islands; and how Frankfurt has migrated well into Poland.

Originally Posted by hillrider
Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, it's 43.6% owned and is managed by Emirates, which will now be able to directly measure the value of oneworld.
Not any more - Emirates sold their stake back to the Sri Lankan government in 2010.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-0...3-million.html

Last edited by irishguy28; Jun 11, 2012 at 4:43 am
irishguy28 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 9:55 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 87
Originally Posted by hillrider

Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, it's 43.6% owned and is managed by Emirates, which will now be able to directly measure the value of oneworld.
SriLanka's renationalization has been somewhat of a disaster, with the airline continuing to incure operating losses. Its fleet is aging and the inflight entertainment systems rather outdated. It is also being compelled to incorporate another loss-making state-run government airline, Mihin Air. So at this juncture, I am not sure what value addition this will bring to OW, except, of course, a few more routing options to India, Maldives and Sri Lanka.
bandana1948 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 11:24 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 71
SriLanka is planning a fleet renewal program right now they are currently deciding between the A350 and the 777. They stated a decision will be made before 2012 ends and also planning to increase their fleet to 30 aircrafts with them joining Oneworld it will give them a chance to grow their fleet even more in the future.
J_Fleish is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 12:02 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London
Programs: AA EXP, SPG Plt
Posts: 2,607
Baffling really. Surely OW has higher priorities. I wonder who their sponsor is?
BobbySteel is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2012, 12:07 pm
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 866
Half a loaf is better than no bread...

UL will offer another option to fly from Europe to Asia (especially the Indian Sub-Continent) without having to fork out BA's huge YQ charges; also, for those who can fly from FRA/PAR etc., another way to avoid APD.

And I daresay UL offers far better service than RJ.

Considering how few active carriers there are in OW today, I say the more the merrier...
FedUp2 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.