Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

LAN Business or AA First Class?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LAN Business or AA First Class?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 8:04 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,913
LAN Business or AA First Class?

I am deciding which service is better and from my research LAN Business is still better because of better entertainment (big screens) better food and service and they still have a lie flat bed? I know the AA Business isn't good but is First Class a big upgrade?
ASUDan130 is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 8:15 pm
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,916
Originally Posted by ASUDan130
I am deciding which service is better and from my research LAN Business is still better because of better entertainment (big screens) better food and service and they still have a lie flat bed? I know the AA Business isn't good but is First Class a big upgrade?
AA First has a better seat than Lan J - their Flagship Suite. Meal service is an enhanced version of what you get J. There are no pajamas or bedding, etc. as you would get on most international F service with non-U.S. airlines. I certainly wouldn't pay extra or use extra miles to fly AA F over LA J.
elitetraveler is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 10:22 pm
  #3  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Miami 7-Million Miler EXP
Posts: 829
AA Flagship Suite

Originally Posted by elitetraveler
AA First has a better seat than Lan J - their Flagship Suite. Meal service is an enhanced version of what you get J. There are no pajamas or bedding, etc. as you would get on most international F service with non-U.S. airlines. I certainly wouldn't pay extra or use extra miles to fly AA F over LA J.
I vote for AA Flagship. I flew LAN J this year AKL-SYD, obviously the AA F cabin & seating (large space) is far superior
MiamiPrep is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 7:54 am
  #4  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,521
Of course AA F is limited to just those routes served by 777 equipment. Many (most) of AA's routes to South America are in smaller aircraft with Y/J configurations only. On the basis of J vs. J, I'd go with Lan. In Lan J vs. AA F, AA without blinking an eye. I am less a fan of LA's J seat than other posters.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 12:55 pm
  #5  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: AS Platinum, AA Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 1,668
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
Of course AA F is limited to just those routes served by 777 equipment. Many (most) of AA's routes to South America are in smaller aircraft with Y/J configurations only.
Does AA have 777 service to anywhere in South America beyond EZE and GRU?

If not, then the question/comparison may be nonstop in F on AA vs. connecting flights in J on LA. I like both the F suites on AA and the flatseats and IFE on LAN, but nonstops over connecting flights are always an easy choice.....
jbalmuth is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 5:19 pm
  #6  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO
Posts: 1,723
I'd vote for LAN Business.

I really like the LAN J seat, food and attentive service. Yes the AA 777 suite is larger, but in reality I don't feel lacking at all with the LAN J seat. The AA 777 F is definitely not worth the extra miles/$$ , and I'd probably still take LAN J if the cost were the same.

I had a terrible experience in LIM recently due to AA's lack of service at the airport. Basically there is no AA staff willing to help passengers prior to a couple hours before the flight to issue BPs or accept bags, so as a business class passenger I had to sit on the cold floor outside security for several hours when I should have been in the lounge. There is no way to avoid a long LIM layover when flying CUZ-LIM on LAN in the afternoon connecting to the AA LIM-MIA redeye, and AA offers no solution to passengers on what I imagine is an extremely common connection. In addition to LAN's excellent service I will avoid flying AA metal to South America if at all possible in the future for this reason alone and would probably take LAN Y over AA J if given the choice.
vxmike is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 6:17 pm
  #7  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,521
Originally Posted by jbalmuth
Does AA have 777 service to anywhere in South America beyond EZE and GRU?

If not, then the question/comparison may be nonstop in F on AA vs. connecting flights in J on LA. I like both the F suites on AA and the flatseats and IFE on LAN, but nonstops over connecting flights are always an easy choice.....
Well yes, GIG (served with a stop in GRU) and MVD from EZE.

On that last note, EZE-MVD must be one of the shortest 777 routes in the world (142 mi/237 km.) I was surprised to go on AA.com and discover that you can buy a stand-alone (5th Freedom I presume) ticket and fly it for US$160 (full Y) $315 (D) or $404 (F) one way.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 1:44 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 557
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
Well yes, GIG (served with a stop in GRU)
Not anymore. Since July, the GRU-GIG segment is being flown by a 763, but the tag-on is bound to disappear anyway in one month when the new nonstop JFK-GIG comes online.
C010T3 is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 2:59 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL
Programs: AA 4MM EXP; Starwood Lifetime Plt
Posts: 2,498
To sum it up: AA First gives you more space and a better presentation of the food; LAN Business is more comfortable because soft bedding and large pillows are supplied for sleeping, LAN wine is better. If all else is equal I would take an extra pillow and fly AA first; if AA First is more expensive or less convenient than LAN Business due connections or timing, I would prefer LAN Business. AA Business is completely different due to the angled seating. LAN Business is preferable to AA Business under almost any imaginable scenario.
ajnaro is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 9:17 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,588
Unless you are traveling with someone else, it's an easy decision for me.

AA F = no seatmate;
Lan = possibility/likelihood of a seatmate;
Any seatmate = annoying.

So I would opt for AA F.
PresRDC is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 12:01 pm
  #11  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: AS Platinum, AA Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 1,668
Again, the AA F suite is only available to Brazil (GRU and temporarily one-stop to RIG), Argentina (EZE only), and seasonally one-stop to Uruguay (MVD), For trips to Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia etc., and other cities in Brazil and Argentina, there's no choice in the matter.
jbalmuth is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2010 | 2:24 pm
  #12  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,809
Originally Posted by PresRDC
Unless you are traveling with someone else, it's an easy decision for me.

AA F = no seatmate;
Lan = possibility/likelihood of a seatmate;
Any seatmate = annoying.

So I would opt for AA F.
Does LAN serve dinner in J JFKLIM (2245 departure)? I know that sounds like a silly question, but I saw a trip report somewhere and the pax only received a snack service due later hour departure. Same thing happened to me on JL. When my GRUJFK upgrade to F didn't clear on AA, I cancelled at the gate and walked over to JL. To my shock, we were airborne on JL in J when I learned there was only snack service. My bad.
jamienbaker is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2010 | 11:50 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: Double OWE (AA EXP, QF Plat), FI Gold
Posts: 1,886
Originally Posted by ASUDan130
I am deciding which service is better and from my research LAN Business is still better because of better entertainment (big screens) better food and service and they still have a lie flat bed? I know the AA Business isn't good but is First Class a big upgrade?
Just to try it out I booked a day trip a few years ago EZE-MVD in AA F and loved it. Especially when we had to circle EZE for hours due to bad weather so I got to really kick back and take it in. No meal service or IFE, of course, but the hard product was very nice.

If it's comparing J to J, LAN hands down. If you're willing to spend the extra cash or miles, I'd fly AA F.
zpaul is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2010 | 2:23 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 557
Originally Posted by jbalmuth
Again, the AA F suite is only available to Brazil (GRU and temporarily one-stop to RIG), Argentina (EZE only), and seasonally one-stop to Uruguay (MVD), For trips to Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia etc., and other cities in Brazil and Argentina, there's no choice in the matter.
You either mean RIO or GIG, since RIG is Rio Grande. Like I said before, the 77E service to GIG was discontinued in July, so F is no longer available at GIG.

Originally Posted by C010T3
Not anymore. Since July, the GRU-GIG segment is being flown by a 763, but the tag-on is bound to disappear anyway in one month when the new nonstop JFK-GIG comes online.
C010T3 is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 5:59 pm
  #15  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ireland
Programs: AA PLT 2MM, IHG Plat
Posts: 3,566
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
On the basis of J vs. J, I'd go with Lan. In Lan J vs. AA F, AA without blinking an eye. I am less a fan of LA's J seat than other posters.
Glad I'm not the only one. I flew SCL-MIA on LAN on the way back from the last Cow Do and was underwhelmed by pretty much every aspect of their J experience. Didn't find the seat particularly comfortable despite the abundant space (still think the IB seat is the most comfortable I've had in OW J) and found little quirks like not being to adjust the seat with the tray table out to be a little irritating. The only positive note was the good food and wine in the SCL lounge even if the lounge itself wasn't up to much.

I'd definitely go for AA F and if it was J v J would go on convenience factor and/or likely award availability. Would choose LA more for the novelty factor and the hope that my last experience was a one off.
oiRRio is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.