Originally Posted by Yaatri (Post 9546037)

NO. :D. WHat got in your undies that you are trying to revive a thread, which by your own rant was dead. ;)

Originally Posted by Yaatri (Post 9520336)

Here is an example of a well reasoned and balanced post. Sticking to the topic without digressing, without getting bogged down with insisting it was my fault, recognising the fact even if GA were correct and within rules, an offer was made and the amount to be given was switched later on.



Here is an example of a post that tried to deny all circumstances and It was not deliberate misinformation. You entered into a situation without knowing the clearly stated rules.focuses entirely on why the compensation must be reduced and that I had no basis to question the conduct of the GA. An attempt to shift the onus for the switch on my conduct and make irrelevant suggestions that I should have asked for the rules before I volunteered , although I had already made it clear the GA switched the offer at the end.

Here is another non-judgemental post in good faith.

Originally Posted by baccarat_king (Post 9546147)

actually, "what got your panties in a knot" is the proper phrase. ;):D

Originally Posted by baccarat_king (Post 9546147)

actually, "what got your panties in a knot" is the proper phrase. ;):D