Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Possible Merger - NWA & Delta?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2006, 4:44 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,806
Possible Merger - NWA & Delta?

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/pro...208&ID=6260940
NWAFA is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2006, 5:09 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: RST
Programs: Delta Diamond; Hilton Diamond; Accor Gold
Posts: 4,839
Northwest Airlines plans to hire a set of bankers to examine "strategic alternatives", increasing speculation that the airline might attempt to mount a competing bid for Delta Air Lines.
Basically getting some legal/financial opinions just in case... Don't want to get caught with your pants down like Delta!
fromYXU is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2006, 6:42 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: PBI
Posts: 754
With all due respect to all the NW employees posting on FT, but unfortunately, 2 negatives don't make a positive in the aviation industry.
the wide chair is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2006, 6:49 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: PBI
Posts: 754
sorry...duplicate
the wide chair is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2006, 6:59 pm
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: Continental Gold Elite, United Premier Executive
Posts: 6,766
If NWA really wanted to go the merger route, it can take CO with far less trouble than anyone else.
HeathrowGuy is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 11:19 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: DL SkyClub Lifer
Posts: 10,000
The FT had some coverage of this

Fairly in-depth, actually. I read it aboard NW 9 NRT-CAN.

Oh, and that's Financial Times, not FlyerTalk. Gotta be specific about which FT!

It'd make for an interesting merger, but I'm not sure whether it'd make sense to have hubs at ATL and MEM and CVG and DTW. Salt Lake would be a nice addition since NW really has nothing in the southwest. But CO's EWR and IAH hubs (and their routes in Latin America, Polynesia and TATL) would be a much more desirable mix IMHO.
DanTravels is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 11:49 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,120
Originally Posted by DanTravels
Fairly in-depth, actually. I read it aboard NW 9 NRT-CAN.

Oh, and that's Financial Times, not FlyerTalk. Gotta be specific about which FT!

It'd make for an interesting merger, but I'm not sure whether it'd make sense to have hubs at ATL and MEM and CVG and DTW. Salt Lake would be a nice addition since NW really has nothing in the southwest. But CO's EWR and IAH hubs (and their routes in Latin America, Polynesia and TATL) would be a much more desirable mix IMHO.

It's actually MICROnesia (Guam et al), not polynesia (Tahiti). CO dropped Tahiti when they discontinued Asutralia service in the 90s
Vulcan is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 12:08 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: DL SkyClub Lifer
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by Vulcan
It's actually MICROnesia (Guam et al), not polynesia (Tahiti). CO dropped Tahiti when they discontinued Asutralia service in the 90s
My bad... I do know the oxymoronic name "Continental Micronesia" but since they fly out of Honolulu, which is in Polynesia, I slipped up.
DanTravels is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 12:29 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DCA
Posts: 3,395
I think a DL/NW merger will have some serious regulatory problems. Can you imagine a combination of NW, DL, AF, and KL? Under one agreement you would have a little less than half of the US to pacific business and the majority of the transatlantic market. The pricing power of that entity would be amazing.
humanoid94 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 12:58 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: UA Silver
Posts: 1,931
Originally Posted by humanoid94
I think a DL/NW merger will have some serious regulatory problems.
That's probably the least worrying part at the moment. See here.
respectable_man is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 2:03 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: NW Gold, '06. Good times.
Posts: 7,363
Originally Posted by DanTravels
But CO's EWR and IAH hubs (and their routes in Latin America, Polynesia and TATL) would be a much more desirable mix IMHO.
Seconded. Moreover, ATL is simply a mess. I flew through there once and swore I'd never do it again unless I absolutely had to.

CO's Europe routes from EWR would be a wonderful boon, not to mention all those BF-configured 772s, 764s, 762s, and 752s. But with CO operating those routes and A/C already, it would make a lot more financial sense to simply code-share. (Besides, there's almost no fleet commonality between NW and CO.) NW's strength has long been the upper Midwest and Asia. If they can grow their Asia services and perhaps expand their East Coast presence - BOS seems to be slowly becoming a "focus city" - they'll be in a stronger position without sharing DL's over-expansion growing pains.
hoyateach is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 3:06 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,884
Originally Posted by hoyateach
...and perhaps expand their East Coast presence - BOS seems to be slowly becoming a "focus city" - they'll be in a stronger position without sharing DL's over-expansion growing pains.
Not sure why they'd want to do that. DTW is close enough to the East Coast that it should suffice for connections. If you're thinking about the BOS-Europe slots opening up this spring/summer, I think it's simply O/D demand that is causing BOS to be used, not really being a focus city. BOS has been a crew base for a long time and I think that's about as "focused" as NW is going to get with BOS for a while. Also, BOS is already a US focus city, so I'm not sure NW would like to "officially" make it a focus city of theirs.

I would look for NW to do something out west in the next 12-18 months, or as soon as they start to get a decent number of their new EMBs and CRJs in operation.
SchmutzigMSP is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 3:31 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: DL SkyClub Lifer
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by SchmutzigMSP
DTW is close enough to the East Coast that it should suffice for connections.
Spoken like someone who doesn't live on the East Coast, and for whom DTW is more or less "on the way to" Europe. I grew up near PHL, and looking at there, EWR and IAD, routing through DTW means on average about 60-90 minutes more flying time than routing through BOS would. I don't think most folks will want to fly "west" to go "east."

(Admittedly, I now live in ITO and many eastbound trips start for me with a westbound hop to HNL.)
DanTravels is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 7:46 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,955
I am for this merger. Think this opens up a great deat of possibilities for me and they places I travel.

rather see a CO NW merger but that seems quite unlikely...
otralot is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 8:50 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi [+MKK4 EBBER R577 EDSEL R577 ELKEY EXERT]
Posts: 15,826
Originally Posted by otralot
rather see a CO NW merger but that seems quite unlikely...
I personally would not. While CO is a great airline, COEX is not. And, I don't want to spend the rest of my days figuring out ways to avoid RJs.
slippahs is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.