Community
Wiki Posts
Search

DC9 Mechanical

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 4:57 am
  #1  
Original Poster
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: BSB
Programs: DL 2 MM
Posts: 5,002
DC9 Mechanical

I was at DTW flying to ROC (Tuesday 10-5) on a DC9 and the left engine bearing apparently disintergrated when the Pilot started the engines (while at the gate) We waited awhile for the mechanics to see if they could fix the Left Engine, but when they figured out the problem we were told that they would bring out another DC9, and the one we were on was not flying anywhere for awhile.

The pilot said that the engine bearing can disintergrate inflight, and if that had happened it would have been catastrophic.

Has anyone been on a DC9 with an inflight engine failure?

RC
Radiocycle is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 9:08 am
  #2  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,688
Years ago I was on a TW DC-9 that had a wingflap malfunction on takeoff. The plane took off from STL at a very funny angle, circled around, and landed again almost immediately. I was 12 years old and I was on the last leg of a 15+ hour journey home from Italy, so I was half-asleep when it happened. Although I felt the unusual angle of the takeoff, I didn't realize what had happened until we landed again and I looked out the window to see STL instead of the MLI I was expecting. Then the pilot made an announcement.

I also very vaguely remember some sort of enginge trouble in a TW (or maybe Ozark?) DC9 in a separate incident, although I was probably no more than 5 at that time, so all I remember is that we took off and landed again (in STL), and that my parents were pissed about the delay.

Ah, childhood TW memories...
themicah is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 9:13 am
  #3  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Scotchtown,NY (SWF)
Programs: DL DM, 1MM, Marriott Plat, SPG gold, Hilton Gold,Avis PS
Posts: 281
RC, when he said "catastrophic", is it your understanding he meant that towards the engine, or towards the airplane? The aircraft can still fly with the 1 engine.
nytracon is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 10:30 am
  #4  
40 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, DC, Chapel Hill, NC (RDU)
Programs: DL Plat (won't hit DM again) 2MM (2.5), HH Gold, PC Gold, Hyatt Plat
Posts: 5,725
RC (or azj or someone who is mechanically expert?)
I am curious about the nature of the failure as well. Does a disintegrating bearing generate metal parts flying through/out of the engine, or is it contained? I seem to recall that when a fan breaks, it does throw out sharp parts that can cause damage to other parts (the United DC10 that crashed in Iowa?).
OTOH, when that 727 or DC9 engine ingested the chunk of ice from the lav (over Florida, wasn't it), didn't the engine just fall off?
Thanks.
tom
mot29 is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 10:56 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,811
Originally Posted by mot29
When that 727 or DC9 engine ingested the chunk of ice from the lav (over Florida, wasn't it), didn't the engine just fall off?
If the engine seizes up inflight, I believe the pylons that hold the engine to the fuselage are designed to break, separating the engine from the aircraft, before the vibrating engine endangers the whole plane or ruptures the fuselage.

Also the nacelles are designed to contain flying parts. It doesn't always work -- I read an NTSB report of a DC9/MD8X aircraft that had an engine seize up during takeoff and spray parts into the rear fuselage, killing a couple of people -- but design is meant discourage this,
BearX220 is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 2:45 pm
  #6  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Niceville, FL, USA
Posts: 2,792
That may be the Delta MD-88 in PNS back in (I think)1998 or 1999. Looked like someone took a can opener to the fuselage. Luckily it happened on the ground or there could have been a lot more casualties.
hnechets is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 9:52 pm
  #7  
30 Nights
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Programs: AA Exec Plat / DL-Silver / Hyatt - Glob / Hilton-Gold
Posts: 1,594
Hi Y'all,

The term "catastrophic" is a common aviation term referring to the type of engine failure. It means the failure was immediate (ie: a seizure) and due to/or caused physical damage to the engine versus a failure where the engine simply stopped running. The term in no way implies any direct serious threat to the aircraft or its occupants.

As mentioned by BearX220, turbine engines are designed to break away from an aircraft versus staying attached and shaking the @#@$ out of the wings/fuselage (and the passenger's pants). Turbines spin at 50,000+ RPMs (educated guess, not fact) so being off balance by the least little bit can cause quite a shake-up.

As mentioned by others, there have been instances of engine failures (I think "break-up" would better describe the condition) causing serious damage/fatalities. Both UA at Sioux City and DL at Pensacola involved engines where turbine fan blades and/or the "hub" that holds them, literally broke apart and "slung off" blades at an extremely high velocity. This is extremely rare.

A frozen bearing may cause an engine to suddenly seize ("catastrophic failure"), and is no minor deal. It may cause a few tense moments in the cockpit depending on when the failure occurred (possible worst case being right at "rotation" on the take-off roll) but pilots are trained to handle these things (they go back to the simulator to practice it every 6 months !!). But the situation is not as grave as the term would imply.

Steve
steve64 is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2004 | 10:43 am
  #8  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seat 1A or 59B
Posts: 564
NW also had the incident with the 727 over Gainesville, FL in which the entire engine simply fell off. Theres a picture of it somewhere online if I remember correctly.
TimCLE is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.