Logan in the Wintertime...
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Programs: DL Gold Medallion
Posts: 213
Logan in the Wintertime...
All,
How bad do the delays/cancellations get at Logan during the wintertime? I have some meetings that I absolutely need to get to in the December/Jan timeframe but I'm concerned that flying into Logan might be impossible because of weather.
I'm considering taking the train into South Station since it seems that the train is much more reliable when there is snow on the ground. I'm also considering flying into Manchester, NH and driving into Boston.
Comments?
How bad do the delays/cancellations get at Logan during the wintertime? I have some meetings that I absolutely need to get to in the December/Jan timeframe but I'm concerned that flying into Logan might be impossible because of weather.
I'm considering taking the train into South Station since it seems that the train is much more reliable when there is snow on the ground. I'm also considering flying into Manchester, NH and driving into Boston.
Comments?
#2

Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From and of Boston.
Posts: 4,973
BOS actually has fewer cancellations than you might expect. Because the airport is on the harbor, the airport is usually warmer than the rest of the region. So, when the Boston area gets snow, it's not uncommon for Logan to either have rain or substantially less snow than the rest of the area. Obviously, the airport can get substantial amounts of snow (esp with wetserly winds, which tend not to bring the same amount of moisture as southerlies, or with a monster storm regardless of wind direction.
While it's true that BOS has more weather-related delays in winter than in summer, it's rare that Logan is actually closed. Manchester is not at all a good alternative choice: MHT gets far, far more snow than does BOS each year, there are far fewer flights into MHT, and the drive from MHT to Boston can be awful in a snowstorm. Amtrak is no guarantee, either.
It's also obviously wise to arrive the afternoon or evening before any -Have-To-Be-There meetings.
While it's true that BOS has more weather-related delays in winter than in summer, it's rare that Logan is actually closed. Manchester is not at all a good alternative choice: MHT gets far, far more snow than does BOS each year, there are far fewer flights into MHT, and the drive from MHT to Boston can be awful in a snowstorm. Amtrak is no guarantee, either.
It's also obviously wise to arrive the afternoon or evening before any -Have-To-Be-There meetings.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Programs: DL Gold Medallion
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by wideman
BOS actually has fewer cancellations than you might expect. Because the airport is on the harbor, the airport is usually warmer than the rest of the region. So, when the Boston area gets snow, it's not uncommon for Logan to either have rain or substantially less snow than the rest of the area. Obviously, the airport can get substantial amounts of snow (esp with wetserly winds, which tend not to bring the same amount of moisture as southerlies, or with a monster storm regardless of wind direction.
While it's true that BOS has more weather-related delays in winter than in summer, it's rare that Logan is actually closed. Manchester is not at all a good alternative choice: MHT gets far, far more snow than does BOS each year, there are far fewer flights into MHT, and the drive from MHT to Boston can be awful in a snowstorm. Amtrak is no guarantee, either.
It's also obviously wise to arrive the afternoon or evening before any -Have-To-Be-There meetings.
While it's true that BOS has more weather-related delays in winter than in summer, it's rare that Logan is actually closed. Manchester is not at all a good alternative choice: MHT gets far, far more snow than does BOS each year, there are far fewer flights into MHT, and the drive from MHT to Boston can be awful in a snowstorm. Amtrak is no guarantee, either.
It's also obviously wise to arrive the afternoon or evening before any -Have-To-Be-There meetings.
I'm confused about what you said regarding Amtrak. Many people suggested that Amtrak had a better on-time record vs. airline arrivals to Boston during the winter months. Do you have any information to support your conclusion?
#4
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Here! (Or there - I'm not sure)
Programs: Peon in all
Posts: 4,358
I find that Amtrak very rarely cancels trains. Most get through, they may be late but finally get there. Airlines cancel flights and airport may close. Amtrak may be late, but will operate unless conditions are too bad. But if they are, the airlines and airports will not operate. And if they're that bad, I wouldn't want to be driving either.
Given the choice, I would rather be sitting on a train (even if it is 2-3 hours late) than be sitting at the airport or stuck on a snowy road!
Given the choice, I would rather be sitting on a train (even if it is 2-3 hours late) than be sitting at the airport or stuck on a snowy road!
#5
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: BOS. Formerly DL PM, GM, now nothing
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by mid
I'm confused about what you said regarding Amtrak. Many people suggested that Amtrak had a better on-time record vs. airline arrivals to Boston during the winter months. Do you have any information to support your conclusion?
Amtrak's most recent performance report shows that the Acela Express has an on-time arrival rate of 77.6 percent -- far less than Amtrak's 94 percent goal.
77.6% means that one out of every four trips arrives more than 20 minutes late. In April of 2005 (when the article was written), 81.46% of flights at Logan were ontime. The two shuttle carriers (Delta and USAirways) had 83.56% and 80.84% respectively.
#6
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Here! (Or there - I'm not sure)
Programs: Peon in all
Posts: 4,358
Originally Posted by HRGM
77.6% means that one out of every four trips arrives more than 20 minutes late. In April of 2005 (when the article was written), 81.46% of flights at Logan were ontime. The two shuttle carriers (Delta and USAirways) had 83.56% and 80.84% respectively.
I think in those conditions, Amtrak would be better then the shuttles.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY, BJX, QRO; previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM
Posts: 18,370
The airline shuttle services are far more reliable than the train, even in inclement weather. Yes, there are some days when the airports just shut down, but it's rare.
#8
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: BOS. Formerly DL PM, GM, now nothing
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by the_traveler
The 83.56% and 80.84% on-time shuttle rates include the summer when it is 80 and sunny. What about the winter when it is 15 degrees, snowy and the airport is closed? I don't think it is 80% then!
I think in those conditions, Amtrak would be better then the shuttles.
I think in those conditions, Amtrak would be better then the shuttles.
In January of 2004, only 0.56% of Delta flights were delayed due to weather. Even if you add on 11.79% for "National Aviation System" as weather (which I don't think is fair, but...), that's still only slightly above 13% weather delays in a month that was full of snow.
I'm as much of a train nut as the next person (well, more, actually
) but Amtrak's reliability is not good, at least partially due to the fact that Metro North owns the tracks south of New Haven.
#9


Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Platinum
Posts: 423
Just take an earlier flight if you are worried about making the meetings. You have as good a chance of an Amtrak being delayed 3+ hours as you do your flight being delayed. I fly to and from Logan weekly in the winter, and am usually on time. I think I was seriously delayed only once last winter. Of course, use common sense and check the weather before you fly. An hour flight beats a 6 hour train ride any day.
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Programs: DL Gold Medallion
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by Gabatta
Just take an earlier flight if you are worried about making the meetings. You have as good a chance of an Amtrak being delayed 3+ hours as you do your flight being delayed. I fly to and from Logan weekly in the winter, and am usually on time. I think I was seriously delayed only once last winter. Of course, use common sense and check the weather before you fly. An hour flight beats a 6 hour train ride any day.
I'm already booking my flights so that I arrive on the ground in Boston about 4.5 hours before my first meeting. This gives me plenty of time to handle any delay in normal operations. Of course, now I'm wondering if I shouldn't widen that window even a little more during the winter months to cover any eventuality. I could arrive the day earlier but the hotel prices are a bit worrisome. I've been trying to make these day trips if possible.
#11
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 1,356
I fly in and out of Logan a fair bit. I think I've actually experienced more delays in the summer afternoons due to thunderstorms than delays due to winter weather. In fact I've been rather amazed what the planes are able to take off and land in during the winter. The only two times I've been affected by Logan closing in the winter have been during full out blizzards (Dec 2002 and Jan 2005 come to mind), in which case the entire city has shut down anyway, Amtrak isn't running, and you won't get to your meeting regardless.
What's interesting is the last time I was snowed out of Boston, I was in NYC. Amtrak wasn't running, the airport had reopened but all the planes were elsewhere. Greyhound was the only way back into the city. As the highways were well plowed and most people were off the roads, it actually took less time than the regular Amtrak to get home.
What's interesting is the last time I was snowed out of Boston, I was in NYC. Amtrak wasn't running, the airport had reopened but all the planes were elsewhere. Greyhound was the only way back into the city. As the highways were well plowed and most people were off the roads, it actually took less time than the regular Amtrak to get home.
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Programs: DL Gold Medallion
Posts: 213
Well, that settles it. I had been on the fence about taking the train vs. flying but you folks seems to have convinced me that flying in wont be too big a deal.
I'll book the tickets as soon as I get the chance.
Thanks for your help.
I'll book the tickets as soon as I get the chance.
Thanks for your help.

