Pill-Popping Pundit To Divorce
Jun 12, 2004, 8:49 am
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLL -> Where The Boyars Are
Programs: AA EXP 1.7 M, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, AARP Sophomore, 14-time Croix de Candlestick
Posts: 18,669
Pill-Popping Pundit To Divorce
Rush Limbarugh, the Oxy-Contin Kid, will now be a three time loser (in all meanings of the words). No word on whether Wilma the drug connection was named as a respondent:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/co...721df00d0.html
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/co...721df00d0.html
Last edited by Non-NonRev; Jun 12, 2004 at 8:52 am
Jun 12, 2004, 11:13 am
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
LOL!!! Extolling family virtues 
Think about it. Jennifer Lopez has a better track record.
Not to mention much more en fuego
Think about it. Jennifer Lopez has a better track record.
Not to mention much more en fuego
Jun 12, 2004, 11:39 am
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
Posts: 31,214
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
LOL!!! Extolling family virtues
Think about it. Jennifer Lopez has a better track record. Not to mention much more en fuego
Think about it. Jennifer Lopez has a better track record.
Not to mention much more en fuego My, my, where are all the fundies and "family values" ditto-heads to turn now?
Jun 12, 2004, 4:49 pm
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: IAD
Programs: AA Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 27,067
We need to protect the sanctity of marriage.
Jun 12, 2004, 4:55 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 12,375
A good quote from the Limbaugh Divorce-III sequel:
"No word on who'll get custody of the rhetoric."
"No word on who'll get custody of the rhetoric."
Jun 12, 2004, 5:12 pm
#6
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Programs: HHonors Silver
Posts: 4,030
Obviously, it's because he's never wrong... 
Jun 12, 2004, 5:20 pm
#7
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Originally Posted by PG
We need to protect the sanctity of marriage.
Jun 12, 2004, 5:32 pm
#8
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Programs: HHonors Silver
Posts: 4,030
Originally Posted by BuddyBird
What does this mean in the context of this thread?
Which is a worse affront to the institution of marriage:
(a) getting married and divorced three times
(b) getting married and then getting divorced within 72 hours (not RL, but what's-her-name)
(c) marrying someone of the same gender and living happily ever after
-- ?
(b) getting married and then getting divorced within 72 hours (not RL, but what's-her-name)
(c) marrying someone of the same gender and living happily ever after
Jun 12, 2004, 5:53 pm
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: IAD
Programs: AA Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 27,067
Originally Posted by pdhenry
Well, put it this way...
Which is a worse affront to the institution of marriage:
Which is a worse affront to the institution of marriage:
(a) getting married and divorced three times
(b) getting married and then getting divorced within 72 hours (not RL, but what's-her-name)
(c) marrying someone of the same gender and living happily ever after
-- ?(b) getting married and then getting divorced within 72 hours (not RL, but what's-her-name)
(c) marrying someone of the same gender and living happily ever after
Jun 12, 2004, 6:01 pm
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,553
I don't listen to him (don't listen to radio at all, actually), so can someone who DOES tell me if he has editorialized about marriage today? I'd be curious to hear what his thoughts about it are, especially in light of the gay marriage controversy. Thanks.
Jun 12, 2004, 6:09 pm
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador: World of Hyatt
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Fairmont Lifetime Plat, UA Silver, dirt elsewhere
Posts: 46,919
I've never heard a second of his show... but,you got me thinking. I don't even know what station he's on nor what time.
I think he's on in the NY market, 12-3.... who in the world can listen? Not many people can spend 3 hours listening to a talk show while they're at work. I know I can't.
What are the demographics of his audience?
I think he's on in the NY market, 12-3.... who in the world can listen? Not many people can spend 3 hours listening to a talk show while they're at work. I know I can't.
What are the demographics of his audience?
Jun 12, 2004, 6:11 pm
#12
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Originally Posted by PG
^ Thank you
Jun 12, 2004, 6:33 pm
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somwhere on the highways and byways of the United States
Programs: WWBTNFTMTP Evangelist
Posts: 16,737
Originally Posted by pdhenry
Well, put it this way...
Which is a worse affront to the institution of marriage:
Which is a worse affront to the institution of marriage:
(a) getting married and divorced three times
(b) getting married and then getting divorced within 72 hours (not RL, but what's-her-name)
(c) marrying someone of the same gender and living happily ever after
-- ?(b) getting married and then getting divorced within 72 hours (not RL, but what's-her-name)
(c) marrying someone of the same gender and living happily ever after
Well if I am on the recieving end of (b) then it by far is the best thing that can happen.
By the way what's her name is BRITNEY SPEARS ^ ^ ^ ^
Jun 12, 2004, 6:38 pm
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,553
Originally Posted by BuddyBird
So, RL shouldn't get divorced, or shouldn't be allowed to get divorced?
Jun 12, 2004, 7:34 pm
#15
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco
Programs: American Airlines Platinum Pro
Posts: 3,412
Originally Posted by anonplz
I think the point they are making is that, if it is true that he, as one of the most prominent of today's self-styled conservatives, editorializes in such way which dovetails with 43's push to amend the Constitution, or at least speaks out against gay marriage based upon the notion of "protecting the sanctity of marriage," then what you have is one of the administration's biggest supporters in a position of suggesting marriage as an institution is weak and will only get weaker if gays are allowed to marry while, at the same time, dissolving his own THIRD marriage. People will say his own personal behavior is irrelevant to the truth of his arguments, which is true, but people will stop listening to him if he winds up looking like a self-indulgent spoiled brat.