Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

Why won't airlines just take $ for status?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why won't airlines just take $ for status?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 12:42 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: PDX
Programs: On a collision course with Kettledom
Posts: 25,550
I actually posted a similar thread 3 years ago:

http://www.flyertalk.com/pasttalk/ft...ML/000092.html

I'm sure there have been others!
opus17 is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 12:54 pm
  #17  
100 Countries Visited
150 Countries Visited
200 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA USA
Programs: AA, UA, WN, HH, Marriott
Posts: 7,293
This raises an interesting difference between hotel and airline programs. With most hotel programs, you can book a guaranteed room, be a no show, pay for the room, and get credit for the stay.

So the question then is why you can't buy a nonrefundable airline ticket, don't fly, and get credit for the flight.

It used to be a problem because you could exchange a NR ticket for a new one with a $100 svc fee. However, now the airlines have software that requires you to cancel the reservation before flight date in order to have the residual funds available for the exchange. If you don't cancel the reservation, you lose your money. So now, theoretically at least, it could be the same as a hotel no-show.
JerryFF is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 3:51 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA working in SJC... United 1P, SPG Gold
Posts: 2
The double miles on the UA deal do count towards elite qualification, but you can't use them for award travel. You get double miles for flights taken between October 15th and December 15th. Unfortunately, you had to register and pay by December 15th to be eligible for this offer.
Alan_Rosenthal is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 10:30 pm
  #19  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,479
These were two of my flights in 2003:
NW SFO-NRT-SIN 16,904 EQM for $357.58
CO OAK-IAH-DTW-IND 5,697 EQM for $121.50

At 2.1c/EQM,
50,000 EQM is $1,050
75,000 EQM is $1,575
100,000 EQM is $2,100

I don't think airlines want to sell status for so cheap.

The number of hours you have to physically sit on a plane keeps cheap flyers (like me) from displacing $50,000-$200,000/yr revenue flyers too easily.

For most people, the 200 hrs flight time & 200 hrs additional hours to/from airports necessary for 100,000 EQM is a big additional opportunity cost:
400 x $100/hr = $40,000
400 x $10/hr = $4,000

How about people who can bill $500-1,000+/hr?
Although I heard once that once your hourly rate goes above $500/yr, private jets make economic sense...

I wonder how many frequent travelers would snap up UA 1K/AA EXP for $2,000 if they didn't have to spend time on planes. Just consider the 6 SWUs/VIPOWs.

----
Personal opinion: I'm sure this idea has been tossed around before, but why not use $ spent as a possible way to qualify.

Level 1: 25,000, 50 segments, or $10,000
Level 2: 50,000, 100 segments, or $20,000
Level 3: 100,000, 200 segments, or $40,000
Level 4: 150,000, 300 segments, or $60,000
Level 5: 200,000, 400 segments, or $80,000
etc...

With unlimited levels. That way people who spend $200,000/yr on flights are definitely higher status than us riff-raff flyers.

[This message has been edited by mitchell (edited Dec 24, 2003).]
mitchell is offline  
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 6:30 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shanghai
Programs: CX Diamond, HH Diamond, A-Club Gold, Hyatt Platinum, Shangri-la Jade, Intercon Gold Ambassador
Posts: 1,370
So what if you can buy status with $$$? If this were commonplace presumably those that would cough up the cash would not be flying that much anyway and therefore not "consuming" perks genuine frequent flyers are also seeking.
ACORD is offline  
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 8:45 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 185
I am not certain that this has gone in the correct direction. TWA used to offer status in one of two ways - either miles flown, or the amount of $$ spent on tickets, regardless of miles flown. For example, $10,000 spent with TW during the course of a year earned Elite 1 status (I'm not sure how much would equal platinum).

My first Elite 1 status with TW was due to having spent a little more than he $10K. After all, the bottom line with the airlines is the $$, not the amount of time you actually spend in their metal.

AA, however, is a different story. Last year I spent $11,000 on AA, but flew just 21K miles (lots of "short" flights, but all on F or YUP fares). Spoke and wrote to AA, but to no avail. They were only concerned about the miles in seats, not about the dollars spent.

And you'd think the dollars would count for something, too. Since when did the airlines stop looking at dollars as their most important resource?
TWA4Ever is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 6:43 am
  #22  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,479
I don't know why airlines don't treat $10K+ flyers better. This UA report from 1/2003 says that the average 1K only spends about $12K/yr.

http://www.the-mechanic.com/pdf/ual_creditors_01.pdf

pp. 27-30 describes types of travelers
The style of travel I'm using is called a "DIY Leisure Opportunist".
19% of travelers, contributes 10% of revenue

pp. 36-38 has average spending per year (in 2002)
1K $12,000 - 18 trips, $700/RT
1P $6,000 - 12 trips, $550/RT
2P $2,000 - 6 trips, $450/RT
General $500 - 2 trips, $250/RT

It came from these United threads about how much 2003 & 2002 United 1K flyers spent.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum50/HTML/024488.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum50/HTML/017426.html

[This message has been edited by mitchell (edited Dec 28, 2003).]
mitchell is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 11:16 pm
  #23  
Original Poster
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: san jose, CA
Posts: 2,998
[BORAXO wrote:}

"AA offers gold for $395 and plat for $595 if you previously qualified. . . ."

I'm confused. If you can requalify by just paying these amounts on AA, why are there still AA elites doing MRs to maintain status? Seems the MRs would cost as much, AND you'd have to fly!
ermdjdsj is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 11:29 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York, USA
Programs: UA Gold, AA Gold, HHonors Silver, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 23
{ermdjdsj wrote:}

"If you can requalify by just paying these amounts on AA, why are there still AA elites doing MRs to maintain status? Seems the MRs would cost as much, AND you'd have to fly!"


I think because you only get to to it once. A one-shot deal. So if you're real close this year and can do a reasonable MR to make it, then do it, and save the "paying up" for a year when because of whatever circumstances you're just really really behind and just have no other option. Because once you pay up to requalify they'll never let you do it again.

But maybe people have other reasons? That's just the one that I'm using.
waytogoflyer is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 11:33 pm
  #25  
In Memoriam
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Seattle
Programs: Ephesians 4:31-32
Posts: 10,690
Now wouldn't buying status just take all the fun out of it.

Just think, no more crazy multi-segment trips, no more weekend transcons just to rack up miles--we might all become normal. What would be the fun in that?
Punki is offline  
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 11:00 am
  #26  
10 Countries Visited1M20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CA USA
Programs: Hilton Lifetime Diamond, AA Executive Platinum, United 1K
Posts: 188
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ermdjdsj:
[BORAXO wrote:}

"AA offers gold for $395 and plat for $595 if you previously qualified. . . ."

I'm confused. If you can requalify by just paying these amounts on AA, why are there still AA elites doing MRs to maintain status? Seems the MRs would cost as much, AND you'd have to fly!
</font>
Well, I paid almost that much for a F MR ticket this past weekend. I could have gone much further for the dollars I spent, but a big factor in being able to do a MR run was being away from home for as short a time as possible.

But, in addition to my Plat status [which I would not have qualified for under the offer anyway], I also received just over 11,000 miles AND 4 500-mile upgrade stickers. And the total cost was a little less than $595, even with parking.

And since the purchased status is a one-time only offer (or so they say now), I may have the opportunity to use that option in the future (if I need to and they offer it.)
hockeydiva is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2004 | 5:55 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 389
On Air Canada, the Maple Leaf Lounge is an elite benefit. However, you can purchase membership, which also entitles you to the other benefits elite members enjoy. This is in a sense buying status. Quite cheaply I might add (dependent on how badly the dollar is doing at the moment).
jasons2e is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.