Security hassles on the way out
Aug 23, 2002 | 8:36 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 2,413
Security hassles on the way out
I was delighted to read about yesterday's TSA press conference in which director James Loy announced the TSA's plan to make travel "less onerous."
All I can say is "Hallelujah!"
They're thinking of getting rid of the idiot security questions... even El Al has stopped extesnive interviewing at Ben Gurion Airport. Besides, the respondent's behavior, not the answer to the questions, was considered to be more significant. Psychological analysis of every passenger is an awful lot to ask of skycaps and ticket agents!
The questions were also designed to identify naive passengers carrying explosive incendiary devices. The famous case--involving the girlfriend of a terrorist at Heathrow--has often been misinterpreted.
Coffee and food are no longer subject to on-site taste tests. (My sister was once asked to open a bottle of wine... she explained that she'd need a corskscrew, which would be forbidden.) And no more breast milk issues!
Above all, Director Loy underscored threat most passengers are not security threats, so efforts should be concentrated on passengers who raise eyebrows.
Some of the more visible frisking and searching pleases leisure travellers--still wary of flying. But I think most of us who are very frequent flyers recognize that these efforts offer only a false sense of security.
My hope is that some of the "randomness" will be taken away. Terrorism isn't random, so let's concentrate on finding patterns, risk factors, and so forth (can you tell I'm an epidemiologist.)
I've already sent a praise-filled email to the FAA; I'd encourage like-minded FlyerTalkers to do the same. The public comments email address is: [email protected]
Happy landings,
Mats.
All I can say is "Hallelujah!"
They're thinking of getting rid of the idiot security questions... even El Al has stopped extesnive interviewing at Ben Gurion Airport. Besides, the respondent's behavior, not the answer to the questions, was considered to be more significant. Psychological analysis of every passenger is an awful lot to ask of skycaps and ticket agents!
The questions were also designed to identify naive passengers carrying explosive incendiary devices. The famous case--involving the girlfriend of a terrorist at Heathrow--has often been misinterpreted.
Coffee and food are no longer subject to on-site taste tests. (My sister was once asked to open a bottle of wine... she explained that she'd need a corskscrew, which would be forbidden.) And no more breast milk issues!
Above all, Director Loy underscored threat most passengers are not security threats, so efforts should be concentrated on passengers who raise eyebrows.
Some of the more visible frisking and searching pleases leisure travellers--still wary of flying. But I think most of us who are very frequent flyers recognize that these efforts offer only a false sense of security.
My hope is that some of the "randomness" will be taken away. Terrorism isn't random, so let's concentrate on finding patterns, risk factors, and so forth (can you tell I'm an epidemiologist.)
I've already sent a praise-filled email to the FAA; I'd encourage like-minded FlyerTalkers to do the same. The public comments email address is: [email protected]
Happy landings,
Mats.
Aug 23, 2002 | 9:15 am
#2
In Memoriam
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: dallas texas usa
Programs: aa plt 4.9MM LTAC
Posts: 14,828
a very small step. i would like to see them put in a directive that you may collect your stuff from the machine and keep it with you while it is searched and/or you are being wanded.
Aug 23, 2002 | 10:14 am
#3
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Miami/Ft. Lauderdale
Programs: AA 2MM Lifetime Platinum, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,349
Has anyone else noticed a BIG improvement in airport security personnel overall? The employees seem to be a totally different caliber of people. They seem much more intelligent and are much more courteous. The lines seem to be much shorter now as well. I guess the big question is whether or not we're any safer than before 9/11.
Aug 23, 2002 | 10:36 am
#5
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Northeast MA, USA.
Programs: HHonors Diamond, DL Silver, TSA Harassee
Posts: 3,657
Neal,
To the first half of your question. Yes, but only when the checkpoint is staffed with TSA employees.
To the second half of your question, NO. We are no safer now than we were on 9/10. This is a monumental waste of taxpayer money.
To the first half of your question. Yes, but only when the checkpoint is staffed with TSA employees.
To the second half of your question, NO. We are no safer now than we were on 9/10. This is a monumental waste of taxpayer money.