Worst Top Elite level?
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Diamond; Marriott Bonvoy - Platinum
Posts: 14,285
As a top-tier DL member I'll chime in here.
There are a couple of passenger profile factors at play: Domestic vs. International and Leisure/Out-of-Pocket vs. Subsidized/Employer-Paid.
If it's not out-of-pocket and domestic, then DL is probably the best program with the CRC and time-of-booking upgrades.
Even mostly LU'ser with CRC, Skymiles probably ranks above the bottom of the frequent flier barrel.
International is another (stinky) kettle of fish.
If a minimum upgrade fare of over $1,000 to Europe is OK, then, DL's for you! Even so, the capacity controls can be *so* strict that folks are talked into waitlisting at those fares, denied the upgrade because Simply Good Business says *NO* same day upgrades *regardless* of front-cabin capacity at boarding. It is my understanding that gate agents have [almost] no leeway in this matter, barring an actual oversold situation. They *will* fly out with BizElite seats empty and folks sitting in coach who paid double the minimum upgrade fare on other carriers.
Platinums do get international lounge access on all tickets (in addition to CRC), though from what I gather those facilities are more on a par with other alliances' mid-tier than top-tier.
To recap - if domestic K fares aren't an issue, DL is the best. However, for out-of-pocket international pax, it's a pretty raw deal compared with top tier benefits on other carriers.
There are a couple of passenger profile factors at play: Domestic vs. International and Leisure/Out-of-Pocket vs. Subsidized/Employer-Paid.
If it's not out-of-pocket and domestic, then DL is probably the best program with the CRC and time-of-booking upgrades.
Even mostly LU'ser with CRC, Skymiles probably ranks above the bottom of the frequent flier barrel.
International is another (stinky) kettle of fish.
If a minimum upgrade fare of over $1,000 to Europe is OK, then, DL's for you! Even so, the capacity controls can be *so* strict that folks are talked into waitlisting at those fares, denied the upgrade because Simply Good Business says *NO* same day upgrades *regardless* of front-cabin capacity at boarding. It is my understanding that gate agents have [almost] no leeway in this matter, barring an actual oversold situation. They *will* fly out with BizElite seats empty and folks sitting in coach who paid double the minimum upgrade fare on other carriers.
Platinums do get international lounge access on all tickets (in addition to CRC), though from what I gather those facilities are more on a par with other alliances' mid-tier than top-tier.
To recap - if domestic K fares aren't an issue, DL is the best. However, for out-of-pocket international pax, it's a pretty raw deal compared with top tier benefits on other carriers.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 12,004
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by LexPassenger:
So: Delta is the Worst. Spread the word.</font>
So: Delta is the Worst. Spread the word.</font>

#18




Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: AA Lifetime Platinum (3MM), QF Lifetime Gold, Bonvoy Lifetime Platinum, Ex-Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 7,808
I don't think WN counts for these purposes.
DL sounds pretty bad for a "major", although free Crown Room is nice..
I have been spending some time with the Air Canada folks and they don't sound too happy.
DL sounds pretty bad for a "major", although free Crown Room is nice..
I have been spending some time with the Air Canada folks and they don't sound too happy.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Beckles:
As for whether or not DL is that bad, it depends partly on your criteria of course. The fact that no DL elites can upgrade L and U fares is a deal killer for me. No other "real" major carrier places such restrictions on upgrading by its elites.</font>
As for whether or not DL is that bad, it depends partly on your criteria of course. The fact that no DL elites can upgrade L and U fares is a deal killer for me. No other "real" major carrier places such restrictions on upgrading by its elites.</font>
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego
Programs: Fly UA MM 1K, Sleep Hyatt & IHG, Hertzer. 2022 Flyertalk Fantasy Football Champion
Posts: 11,203
Market Cap in Billions as of March 1, 2002
United - UAL - 0.745
American AMR - 4.21
Delta - DAL - 4.46
Continental - CAL - 2.08
America West - AWA - 0.131
Northwest - NWAC - 1.45
US Airways - U - 0.368
Alaska Air - ALK - 0.852
Southwest - LUV - $15.95
I'm no financial analyst, but I'll go out on a limb and say that if Southwest is the only airline in this group making money AND has a market cap larger than the other 8 "majors" conbined - they are a major airline.
United - UAL - 0.745
American AMR - 4.21
Delta - DAL - 4.46
Continental - CAL - 2.08
America West - AWA - 0.131
Northwest - NWAC - 1.45
US Airways - U - 0.368
Alaska Air - ALK - 0.852
Southwest - LUV - $15.95
I'm no financial analyst, but I'll go out on a limb and say that if Southwest is the only airline in this group making money AND has a market cap larger than the other 8 "majors" conbined - they are a major airline.
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend


Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 63,783
The usual measurement for the "size" of an airline isn't the market cap. It's the revenue, as a reflection of the size of the network and the number of passengers carried.
On that level, AA is far larger than WN, almost 4x.
On that level, AA is far larger than WN, almost 4x.
#22




Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New York City, United States.
Posts: 2,736
If you are not primarily a domestic road warrier, then CO is worst.
I think that there is no correct answer. Each program has its strengths and weaknesses, I think smart FT'ers find a program that compliments their individual flying profile.
For instance, I used to be loyal to CO. But when my flying patterns changed from domestic to international, I had to adapt and change to AA.
It seems though that Delta's big saving grace,among its unhappy elites, seems to be lounge access. This gets a big yawn from me. Big deal. So what? AA (as well as UA for that matter) allow access for international travelers.
I think that there is no correct answer. Each program has its strengths and weaknesses, I think smart FT'ers find a program that compliments their individual flying profile.
For instance, I used to be loyal to CO. But when my flying patterns changed from domestic to international, I had to adapt and change to AA.
It seems though that Delta's big saving grace,among its unhappy elites, seems to be lounge access. This gets a big yawn from me. Big deal. So what? AA (as well as UA for that matter) allow access for international travelers.
#23


Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Represa CA
Programs: Hilton LTD, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Amb/ LTTE, AA LTP, Avis PC, National EE, Seabourn DE
Posts: 3,109
SWA is a major, like it or not. Or, the majors react to WN pricing.
Southwest top tier is great if you have use for it. Since 9/11, I would rate WN as bottom of the barrell for my purposes. And when my companion pass expires in June it will have expired for the first time in three years.
Southwest top tier is great if you have use for it. Since 9/11, I would rate WN as bottom of the barrell for my purposes. And when my companion pass expires in June it will have expired for the first time in three years.
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Plato90s:
The usual measurement for the "size" of an airline isn't the market cap. It's the revenue, as a reflection of the size of the network and the number of passengers carried.
On that level, AA is far larger than WN, almost 4x.</font>
The usual measurement for the "size" of an airline isn't the market cap. It's the revenue, as a reflection of the size of the network and the number of passengers carried.
On that level, AA is far larger than WN, almost 4x.</font>
hmmm, i seem to remember southwest being rated #2 for either number of flights or number of passengers. i would consider them major on that and the fact that they influence the price we pay on other airlines in cities they serve.
------------------
f
#25




Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: SDF/TLV/ATL
Programs: AA EXP, UA LT Ag, Marriott LT Ti, Hyatt Glob, Avis PC, Busted-Knuckles Club.
Posts: 3,007
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Beckles:
The fact that DL's PM's can not upgrade the two lowest fare classes period and M class minimum international makes them the worst of all majors (aside from WN). No other major carrier limits upgrades that much to their top tier (or any other tier for that matter).
Name one other major with an FC cabin that does not allow elites to upgrade cheap fares domestically? NW, nope ... CO, nope ... UA, nope ... AA, nope ... US, nope ... The LUser thing puts them right to the bottom in my book.</font>
The fact that DL's PM's can not upgrade the two lowest fare classes period and M class minimum international makes them the worst of all majors (aside from WN). No other major carrier limits upgrades that much to their top tier (or any other tier for that matter).
Name one other major with an FC cabin that does not allow elites to upgrade cheap fares domestically? NW, nope ... CO, nope ... UA, nope ... AA, nope ... US, nope ... The LUser thing puts them right to the bottom in my book.</font>
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego
Programs: Fly UA MM 1K, Sleep Hyatt & IHG, Hertzer. 2022 Flyertalk Fantasy Football Champion
Posts: 11,203
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Plato90s:
The usual measurement for the "size" of an airline isn't the market cap. It's the revenue, as a reflection of the size of the network and the number of passengers carried.
On that level, AA is far larger than WN, almost 4x.</font>
The usual measurement for the "size" of an airline isn't the market cap. It's the revenue, as a reflection of the size of the network and the number of passengers carried.
On that level, AA is far larger than WN, almost 4x.</font>
On the topic of programs, I was not a fan of WN because of the boarding process, no forst, etc. However using them for all of my west coast trips in the past year I can appreciate their program. I still have my UA status for long-haul flying, however condidering that your partner points count as status points on WN, it's a great deal. No other airline allows you to earn free flights faster than WN. WN is also the only airline that truly has no blackout dates, including your companion pass person. Think about this, you can use a free ticket and take someone with you anywhere in the U.S. - that's awesone!
#27
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Jersey City
Posts: 1,321
i keep aa exp status for upgrading int'l. they have the best policies regarding pricing and vips (although 2's were much better than ow's) i keep nw plat status for upgrading domestically. they are the only major to allow upgrades on domestic award tickets, plus association with co, which i prefer to nw to travel to asia(upgrading is easier than on nw). i have dl, us, and co for no other reason than after sept 11, it was easy to (re)qualify with double status miles.
#28
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Programs: AA- Lifetime Platinum; Marriott - Lifetime Platinum: Starwood - Gold; IHG - Platinum
Posts: 2,201
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TravelManKen:
WN is also the only airline that truly has no blackout dates, including your companion pass person.</font>
WN is also the only airline that truly has no blackout dates, including your companion pass person.</font>
And just as important: No capacity controls! That's awesome! But I hate standing in line for hours which is what I do whenever I fly WN (especially if I have to connect). Therefore, I avoid WN.
#29
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,619
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TravelManKen:
Market Cap in Billions as of March 1, 2002
United - UAL - 0.745
American AMR - 4.21
Delta - DAL - 4.46
Continental - CAL - 2.08
America West - AWA - 0.131
Northwest - NWAC - 1.45
US Airways - U - 0.368
Alaska Air - ALK - 0.852
Southwest - LUV - $15.95
I'm no financial analyst, but I'll go out on a limb and say that if Southwest is the only airline in this group making money AND has a market cap larger than the other 8 "majors" conbined - they are a major airline.</font>
Market Cap in Billions as of March 1, 2002
United - UAL - 0.745
American AMR - 4.21
Delta - DAL - 4.46
Continental - CAL - 2.08
America West - AWA - 0.131
Northwest - NWAC - 1.45
US Airways - U - 0.368
Alaska Air - ALK - 0.852
Southwest - LUV - $15.95
I'm no financial analyst, but I'll go out on a limb and say that if Southwest is the only airline in this group making money AND has a market cap larger than the other 8 "majors" conbined - they are a major airline.</font>
#30




Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Choice Plat, Marriott Lifetime Gold, National Exec Elite, Spirit Gold
Posts: 3,135
Beckles, I can see your point, but it doesn't reflect reality. WN is expected to be the largest carrier based on the number of passengers carried, within the next 5 years. If they can do it without flying into the congested major NYC airports, more power to 'em. But if you use the usual industry benchmarks, WN certainly is among the top cariers....

