Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

Delta Silver--should I defect to CO? NW? UA?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Delta Silver--should I defect to CO? NW? UA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2002 | 8:04 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 2,424
Delta Silver--should I defect to CO? NW? UA?

Hello everyone...
I'm a Delta Silver Medallion and have been for several years. But I'm thinking of switching. Delta has cut back its service so drastically and the Medallion benefits are almost nonexistent.

I live in Columbus, Ohio and travel to LA, Honolulu, Stockholm, Boston, New York, and Washington with some regularity.


Here is what I'm thinking.

Continental
Pros: Better Elite benefits. Best first/business service to Honolulu.
Cons: Really bad memories of the Continental Lite era, Newark.

Delta
Pros: I've been with them for a while. Generally professional ground and cabin crew. Best business class to Europe (of the US carriers.)
Cons: Drastic cuts to cabin service and to the FF plan.


American
Pros: Good if you're stuck in Economy. Partner with Finnair.
Cons: Everything else.

United
Pros: Partner with SAS, Air New Zealand, Austrian.
Cons: Everything else

Northwest
Pros: Cheap tickets (both cabins) to HNL
Cons: Reputation for incredibly bad service.


Please let me know what you think. I look forward to your replies.
Mats is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2002 | 9:04 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Southwest Desert, under a rock, watch out! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<" You can get there, but it's gonna cost you!
Programs: Previously NonePass, now UA 1K (*Enhanced*)
Posts: 4,248
CO sucks, NW sucks, Delta sucks, United sucks too. stay home, man!
snake is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2002 | 9:07 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Volunteerland
Programs: Delta GM, Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 1,222
Mats, Myself and many others have long said that FO status isn't much status on Delta. You are exactly right about that loss of benefits. Based on your location and your destinations, I would have to vote for either AA or UA.Considering the potential labor issues at UA, I'd go AA. You'll be able to upgrade off of any published fare (I believe) and if you get stuck in coach it doesn't involve pain like it does at Delta.Good Luck!
bnaboy is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2002 | 9:32 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Programs: United 1K, American EXP & 3 Million Miler, Hyatt Globalist & Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,387
All told, I have found AA to be doing a really good job in a tough time. They have their issues at times for sure, but overall good program and good people.
mktozd is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2002 | 8:08 am
  #5  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
CO: Unless you like paying through the nose, you won't upgrade to HNL or any international destination. Nothing like the worst coach product in the industry, room-wise for that EWR-HNL flight.

NW: Eh. No miles on CyberSavers and also a very stingy international upgrade policy. Coach product is poor.

UA: E+ makes the coach experience for the elite flyer acceptable. Labor issues may ground this airline however. Marginal international upgrade policies.

AA: Upgrade any fare and MRTC. That gets my vote.
Spiff is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2002 | 12:32 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Munich, Germany
Programs: LH HON, DL FO/MM, Marriott Lifetime Platinum, Accor Lifetime Platinum, Sixt Diamond
Posts: 6,174
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Mats:
I live in Columbus, Ohio and travel to LA, Honolulu, Stockholm, Boston, New York, and Washington with some regularity.</font>
I guess here is the key which airline you should pick. The biggest problem seems to be ARN due to the post-09/11 service cuts.
rcs85551 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2002 | 9:53 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 191
I think this sort of topic is very valuable, since it allows people who are not yet committed or who are thinking of changing allegiances to get the "street word" on each airline. In my experience, European and Asian flaggeds are infinitely superior to American, if only because there is a greater tradition of service in the Old World and/or the airline is the one and only international airline of that country and thus represents it. For this reason alone, I think of the airlines that belongs to an international consortium is particularly valuable. I myself am a NW elite, and it has served me well since only NW really offers the really cheapest NYC-NRT airfares. CO does seem a cut above, with the corporate culture having a splash of SW style "can-do" spirit. Peace.
straight-flava is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 7:31 am
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Programs: AA Plat 2MM, MR Gold, Avis Pref
Posts: 41,109
CO I believe has the best Biz Class service IMHO, In CMH, it is an HP base which is a CO partner (NW too???) which count toward base miles.. Cle hub is a short drive away... hmmm

HoKeY sucks
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 9:02 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DCA
Programs: AMC MovieWatcher, Giant BonusCard, Petco PALS Card, Silver Diner Blue Plate Club
Posts: 22,314
UA's Y+ offers more room than AA's MRTC.

I suspect your upgrade chances are better on UA than on CO -- since CO offers unlimited free domestic upgrades, everyone is signed up for 'em so silvers have a tough time. On UA they aren't free (you earn 2000 miles of ugprades for every 10000 you fly) so not everyone requests an upgrade on every flight.

I'd stay away from CO b/c of their Economy-minus. Likewise, I'd run from DL if I had to sit in the back (and since I would be buying mostly L and U fares...).

As a Silver, coach service is important. I think the only choice is AA and UA.

Ultimately, the answer rests on
your travel profile
what awards are important to you
etc etc etc

It's an individual thing.
gleff is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 9:17 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SAT, AUS, HNL
Programs: NW Plat, DL 2 MM Flying Colonel, AA EXP MM, CO,NW,UA, MM, Hilton, Hyatt Diamond, QF Club Lifetime
Posts: 250
I switched to AA this year after 20 years

flying with DL. I was a Flying Colonel,

MM, and Silver M. So far AA rules; 100%

upgrade rate on ANY coach fare, my wife

can upgrade to FC, cannot on DL. More flights

better service, better FAs. AA miles are

easier to accumulate with more partnerships.

If I ever have to fly coach in AA, I'll have

loads more room than DL. DL is run by

beancounters since Leo showed up. Not looking

back, it's AA all the way.
bobemac is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 10:10 am
  #11  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Programs: AA- Lifetime Platinum; Marriott - Lifetime Platinum: Starwood - Gold; IHG - Platinum
Posts: 2,201
Bobemac: I see this is your first post. Welcome to Flyertalk! It's nice to have another member from San Antonio.

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by bobemac:
I switched to AA this year after 20 years

flying with DL. I was a Flying Colonel,

MM, and Silver M. So far AA rules; 100%

upgrade rate on ANY coach fare, my wife

can upgrade to FC, cannot on DL. More flights

better service, better FAs. AA miles are

easier to accumulate with more partnerships.

If I ever have to fly coach in AA, I'll have

loads more room than DL. DL is run by

beancounters since Leo showed up. Not looking

back, it's AA all the way.
</font>


[This message has been edited by paradocs (edited 02-13-2002).]
paradocs is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 10:11 am
  #12  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Programs: AA- Lifetime Platinum; Marriott - Lifetime Platinum: Starwood - Gold; IHG - Platinum
Posts: 2,201
Sorry, duplicate.

[This message has been edited by paradocs (edited 02-13-2002).]
paradocs is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 12:18 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OH
Programs: AA Lifetime Plat, Marriot Lifetime Gold
Posts: 10,017
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by gleff:
UA's Y+ offers more room than AA's MRTC.
</font>
Remember though, you are not guarentee E+, even as an elite, on UA. However, regardless of your status you will get MRTC on AA. I'm 5'10" and all of my height is in my legs and I find MRTC quite comfortable.



------------------
I Love New York
Redhead is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 4:27 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 885
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Spiff:
Nothing like the worst coach product in the industry, room-wise for that EWR-HNL flight.</font>
Personally, I prefer Continental coach when flying to/from Hawaii over the other airlines. It is the only coach service with personal TVs at every chair with six channels to choose from as well as some Nintendo type games to play. (I've flown Delta, Hawaiian and American to/from Hawaii).
As for food and drink, the food is as good or better than others (except Hawaiian has a better packaged dessert, such as a Macadamia Nut cookie ice cream sandwich), and Continental seems to have more full drink services in coach than any other airline.

But you are right, the seat pitch is the worst (Delta and Hawaiian seemed just as bad as Continental). So it's a choice of what's more important to you -- seat pitch or entertainment options. Me, I choose entertainment. If you're tall, then maybe you'll go the other way.
anthonyanthony is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.