In flight announcement "someone caught smoking..."
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Georgetown, TX
Posts: 326
In flight announcement "someone caught smoking..."
On a recent KIX -> HNL flight on JAL there was an announcement mid-flight that one of the first class passengers was caught smoking in the bathroom. This was followed with a reminder that smoking is not permitted, etc. I have never been on a flight where such an announcement was made - but I imagine that semi-public shaming (no names were used, or seat numbers, or other identifying information)
with this sort of announcment would serve as a major deterrent to the guilty party in the future. Being a non-smoker I was also pretty amused by the whole thing.
Has anyone else heard a similar announcement? Do you think an American carrier would make a similar announcement? If not, what do American carriers do if they catch someone sneaking a cigarette? Do people often try to sneak cigarettes during flights?
A video was also played during the flight about being considerate towards other passengers. This included a cartoon of 'bad behavior' such as talking on a cell phone, physically assulting others, getting drunk, and one other behavior that I can not recall right now.
------------------
Bad spellers of the world untie!
with this sort of announcment would serve as a major deterrent to the guilty party in the future. Being a non-smoker I was also pretty amused by the whole thing.Has anyone else heard a similar announcement? Do you think an American carrier would make a similar announcement? If not, what do American carriers do if they catch someone sneaking a cigarette? Do people often try to sneak cigarettes during flights?
A video was also played during the flight about being considerate towards other passengers. This included a cartoon of 'bad behavior' such as talking on a cell phone, physically assulting others, getting drunk, and one other behavior that I can not recall right now.
------------------
Bad spellers of the world untie!
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Copenhagen
Programs: British Airways Gold (oneWorld Emerald), Starwood Preferred Guest Platinum
Posts: 1,713
Wonderful!
Now what they really should do: when someone in F is smoking that person should be punished by spending the remainder of the flight in Y
Now what they really should do: when someone in F is smoking that person should be punished by spending the remainder of the flight in Y
#4
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sun City, CA, USA
Programs: AA,UA,HH,Marriott
Posts: 398
SCIGirl...It sounds like a great idea to me, but I've sure never heard an announcement like that. I'd think it would bring on spontaneous applause.
BTW, I love your tag line. I have a sweatshirt with that on it. It's amazing to me how few people actually "get" it. <G> Jean
BTW, I love your tag line. I have a sweatshirt with that on it. It's amazing to me how few people actually "get" it. <G> Jean
#5




Join Date: May 1999
Location: Central New Jersey
Programs: UA-Platimum 2 MM, HH-Gold, MR-Lifetime Gold, Hyatt-Discoverist
Posts: 6,238
On a recent EWR-FCO flight the FA, made repeated announcements about the severity of fines if anyone is caught smoking. The fact that this was done several times, made me believe lots of people tend to ignore the warnings on this route.
#7
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: WILD ANIMAL PARK (SAN), CA> GOLD-CO, MARRIOTT, HH, STARWOOD, HYATT,
Posts: 1,373
Put all the smokers in the LAV and let them smoke TOGETHER! That way they can enjoy it to the max!
Or better yet. Create a Smoking class section in a small part of the cargo hold without air conditioning and use only non inflamable materials with minimal services. Sort of like a BRIG!
[This message has been edited by ROADRUNNER (edited 07-19-2001).]
Or better yet. Create a Smoking class section in a small part of the cargo hold without air conditioning and use only non inflamable materials with minimal services. Sort of like a BRIG!
[This message has been edited by ROADRUNNER (edited 07-19-2001).]
#8


Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: SAN Diego (Hillcrest); formerly LEXington, KY; still like the nym
Programs: DL Platinum; Marriott Lifetime Platinum; married to Hilton Elite
Posts: 3,029
"Dyslexics of the world untie" was slogan-maker Nancy Lebovitz's creation in the late '70's, I believe. Button Slogans
Nice variation!
Federal law has up to a $2000 fine for pax who tamper with smoke detectors. (We all know this, right, or are you sleeping through the pre-flight?) Smoking in lavs or elsewhere on planes is also illegal, on flights to or from or within the US. The pax should be turned over to the police. Much better deterrent, IMO.
------------------
"Service" should be a noun, not a verb.
Nice variation!
Federal law has up to a $2000 fine for pax who tamper with smoke detectors. (We all know this, right, or are you sleeping through the pre-flight?) Smoking in lavs or elsewhere on planes is also illegal, on flights to or from or within the US. The pax should be turned over to the police. Much better deterrent, IMO.
------------------
"Service" should be a noun, not a verb.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 15,862
This is an incredibly common occurence on long haul flights. I would say that I hear a similar announcement at least 10 times a year mostly on US carriers. On one occasion I heard them threatening to have the police arrest the man at the other end.
BTW, the smart ones put a condom over the smoke detector and then remove it afterwards (no signs of tampering).
As for the contamination thing, you are right in way that you did not intend. When smoking was the norm, the air exchange systems worked much better. The entire cabin of an average plane was changed every 45 seconds or so. These days it can take many many minutes to get the same effect. In effect therefore we are all constantly contaminated by everyone else in the cabin!
BTW, the smart ones put a condom over the smoke detector and then remove it afterwards (no signs of tampering).
As for the contamination thing, you are right in way that you did not intend. When smoking was the norm, the air exchange systems worked much better. The entire cabin of an average plane was changed every 45 seconds or so. These days it can take many many minutes to get the same effect. In effect therefore we are all constantly contaminated by everyone else in the cabin!
#10
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Soon to be in YYZ. AC Prestige, AA Gold
Posts: 264
I have heard of an incident a few years ago about a DL flight in the newspaper. The FA caught someone smoking in the lav on a flight from PDX-SEL. They didn't let it go so easily, as they ended up turning over the individual to the authorities in SEL. It turned out to be someone in the US military who was recently stationed in Seoul.
#11



Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Nr. Lugano
Programs: LH SEN, IHG Platinum, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,615
I seem to remember a case some years ago on Air France. They thought someone was smoking in the lav and broke the door down. The guy had his pants round his ankles and ended up suing the airline for "invasion of privacy". Whether or not he was smoking was never clear, it was a question of "their word against his".
#12
Moderator Communications Coordinator, Signatures


Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: deep within the Eskimo lair
Programs: TubWorld, Bar Alliance, Borratxo Legendarium
Posts: 16,970
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Goldlust:
Wonderful!
Now what they really should do: when someone in F is smoking that person should be punished by spending the remainder of the flight in Y
</font>
Wonderful!
Now what they really should do: when someone in F is smoking that person should be punished by spending the remainder of the flight in Y
</font>
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Close to the beach
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K, DL GM, Tumlare Bussresor Super Class
Posts: 6,972
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by hfly:
BTW, the smart ones put a condom over the smoke detector and then remove it afterwards (no signs of tampering).
</font>
BTW, the smart ones put a condom over the smoke detector and then remove it afterwards (no signs of tampering).
</font>

#14
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: bringing sexy back
Posts: 7,751
Was on a transatlantic KLM flight last year, I think JFK-AMS. Suddenly, everyone could smell very strong cigarette smoke coming through the ventilation system. Frenzy among flight attendants, going around sniffing. Finally they isolated the lav it was coming from, and waited outside for the perpetrator -- a kindly looking elderly gentleman who I guess just couldn't go without. He received a stern talking-to in the galley, and then when we got to Schiphol, the smoker was escorted out by police before other passengers were allowed to deplane. No public announcement was made, but it was pretty obvious what had happened.
#15
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bangkok, Madrid, Miami
Programs: AA Plt, BA Silver, UA Premier, SIA PPS, SL Exec, HH, Hyatt, Starwood, Marriott
Posts: 164
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Vunder31:
The really smart ones don't smoke and find better use for their condoms
</font>
The really smart ones don't smoke and find better use for their condoms

</font>
------------------
The trouble with resisting temptation is...that you may not get another chance :-)

