Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

Carry on Limitations?

Carry on Limitations?

Old May 27, 2000 | 1:00 am
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Tempe,Az,USA
Posts: 472
Carry on Limitations?

I noticed some signs posted at Phoenix Sky Harbor by NorthWest Airlines stating " New FAA Regulations Limits Carry on Luggage To One piece Per Person " I question if this is fact or is NorthWest Airlines just making it sound as if the FAA is to blame for a NorthWest policy? Does anyone out there know the FAA Rules?
Sydneyjb is offline  
Old May 27, 2000 | 4:27 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 739
> NWA says .... New FAA Regulations Limits
Carry on Luggage To One piece Per Person

To my knowledge there is nothing in 14CFR
(FARs) that imposes this limit.

Limits could also be part of NWA's Part 121
(sched airline) Operating Certificate, and
never published as a "regulation" per se,
but nonetheless carry the full force of
regulation.

The other possibility is that NWA happens
to be the victim of an errant FAA Inspector.
There are as many interpretations of the
regs as there are inspectors. What one will
pass, another will as certainly fail.

The more (most?) likely scenario is that
NWA is simply lying to its customers - again.

-doug
dranz is offline  
Old May 27, 2000 | 7:54 am
  #3  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Tempe,Az,USA
Posts: 472
I am in total aggreement with you! I will report this to the FAA on Tuesday!
Sydneyjb is offline  
Old May 27, 2000 | 10:53 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 528
What the FAA says is that all airlines are to set their own regulations and these regulations have to be approved by the FAA before taking effect so in a way the FAA is responsible for what restrictions the customers are given.

Here's a link that explains the procedure.
http://www.faa.gov/apa/pr/july/july_22.html

or
http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/atos/docs...i/s3_1_5op.pdf
http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/atos/docs...T2R0rg-Ops.pdf

(you need acrobat reader with the last 2).

So technically the carrier is right because their regulations are approved and then enforced by FAA.
A Flygirl is offline  
Old May 27, 2000 | 11:43 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,811
What the airline is doing is setting an unnecessarily restrictive, inconvenient carry-on rule solely for its own operational convenience... then trying to deflect pax dissatisfaction to the FAA. This is also known as lying... a method of dealing with customers that is so integral to Northwest's DNA, they probably don't even recognize it as such.

Speaking of demented carry-on policing, I was flying AS SEA-LAX last week. The MD-80 was half full. A gate agent in the jetway was forcing every passenger to check their cube-shaped rollaway carryon, whether or not they fit under the seat. When we got into the cabin the overhead bins were 75% empty, containing only laptops and coats.

We were ten minutes late pushing back because they had to run all those gate-checked bags from jetway down to the ramp, and when we got to LAX we had to cool our heels for 40 minutes to get our bags back.

Net result of policy: late plane, mad pax, no discernible efficiencies or safety improvement.
Nobody us

BearX220 is offline  
Old May 27, 2000 | 11:51 am
  #6  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Third planet from the Sun
Posts: 7,024
I find if odd how Northwest is going the opposite direction as Continental. Continental has taken United to court over the templates it has installed over the x-ray machines.
Tango is offline  
Old May 27, 2000 | 7:26 pm
  #7  
doc
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 46,817
Indeed!

For the last decade-

CO - up
NW - down

Just an observation!
doc is offline  
Old May 27, 2000 | 10:38 pm
  #8  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 215
I for one think it is about time something
is done about the carry-on abuses. Last weekend I witnessed a few carry-ons which took up over half the overhead. Another
passenger said that it looked like there were
a few more "kitchen" sinks coming on board.

And, if some of the passengers can hardly
place their carry-on wheelies in the overhead
bins, I wonder what they are even doing
bringing them on board.

Yes, I am surely one who is a little fed up
with carry-on situation - especially with a full load and time wasted trying to find space for those huge wheelies.
countryboy is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.