Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

First Class/Bus Class - Cathay vs. Quantas

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

First Class/Bus Class - Cathay vs. Quantas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 8:05 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Programs: Alaska Airlines
Posts: 1
First Class/Bus Class - Cathay vs. Quantas

I'm flying from Seattle to New Zealand and have enough miles to fly first class on Cathay or Quantas...would appreciate thoughts on the best as well as if first is worth the extra miles or if business is "good enough"
ledbett49 is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 10:00 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: AS 100K, Million miler
Posts: 245
I have flown both airlines to Auckland in the last year and there are clear tradeoffs that you might want to consider in advance by examining the schedule on each airline's website. The advise below assumes you are using miles rather than purchasing a ticket.

If your time is valuable and you can get a J seat on the QF nonstop from LAX to AKL, it will save quite a bit of time over the circuitous route on CX through HKG, which could entail a very long layover of up to 10 hours on the way back.

In my mind, for a trip this long, it is worth it to spend the extra miles and go First, knowing that on CX, there is only J between HKG and AKL.

It is almost impossible to find F seats on the QF nonstop LAX-AKL, and difficult at best to find F seats through SYD to the other QF destinations in NZ: Christchurch, Wellington and Queenstown. F seats are much easier to find on CX, particularly within 1 week of departure when they load in lots of inventory.

If you elect to go F, the other key difference is that QF will be full and on CX you are quite likely to share the F cabin with only 1 or two other people.

If after you make your choice you have difficulty finding seats on your dates of choice, PM me and I will give you a hand.

Last edited by macfadsj; Jan 9, 2011 at 10:05 pm
macfadsj is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 10:13 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: BA Gold; AA Lfe Time PLT ; Marriott Titanium, LFT GLD
Posts: 1,276
Originally Posted by macfadsj
I have flown both airlines to Auckland in the last year and there are clear tradeoffs that you might want to consider in advance by examining the schedule on each airline's website.

If your time is valuable and you can get a J seat on the QF nonstop from LAX to AKL, it will save quite a bit of time over the circuitous route on CX through HKG, which could entail a very long layover of up to 10 hours on the way back.

In my mind, for a trip this long, it is worth it to spend the extra miles and go First, knowing that on CX, there is only J between HKG and AKL.

It is almost impossible to find F seats on the QF nonstop LAX-AKL, and difficult at best to find F seats through SYD to the other QF destinations in NZ: Christchurch, Wellington and Queenstown. F seats are much easier to find on CX, particularly within 1 week of departure when they load in lots of inventory.

If you elect to go F, the other key difference is that QF will be full and on CX you are quite likely to share the F cabin with only 1 or two other people.

If after you make your choice you have difficulty finding seats on your dates of choice, PM me and I will give you a hand.

Good advice....

The extra miles for F above J is relatively small.

QF is more direct but F difficult to book.

CX is great even in J. Service is excellent. But having done a 5 hour layover at HKG 10 hours would be a real drag even in the CX F Wing Lounge.
nonesuch flyer is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 10:18 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: HKG, BOS
Programs: CX SL, AB Gold, AF/KL FB Silver, HU/HX Silver, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,596
As mentioned, for such a long trip, travel in F would be much more pleasant although award inventory on both airlines will be harder to find. Even if you do have a 10 hour layover in HKG, try going out of the airport and explore a bit - Hong Kong's usually ranked top among all Asian destinations. Plus, that would hit two birds with one stone.

Originally Posted by macfadsj
In my mind, for a trip this long, it is worth it to spend the extra miles and go First, knowing that on CX, there is only J between HKG and AKL.
It really depends on the date OP is flying. CX is currently operating its 744 (with F) for CX107/8 until 6 March 2011, when it switches back to its 343 (2-class).
toyotaboy95 is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 8:18 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
unsavy new member

I'm very new at miles programs. Could you please explain the different classes of seats. thank you
germanjedi is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 9:42 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 737
websites

Originally Posted by germanjedi
I'm very new at miles programs. Could you please explain the different classes of seats. thank you
Try airlines websites for more detail. F - first, J - business.
Cathay first
http://www.cathaypacific.com/cpa/en_.../newfirstclass
Cathay business
http://www.cathaypacific.com/cpa/en_...wbusinessclass
learningtime is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 4:21 pm
  #7  
40 Nights
5M
100 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Naples FL, Munich DE
Programs: UA MM, AA 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,815
I'd highly recommend experiencing CX long-haul intercontinental First Class. It is absolutely fantastic!
Counsellor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.