Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] RGN First class comes back again!!!!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 19, 2013, 9:45 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: fti
People, please edit/use the wiki so same questions are not always asked.

The current CTA decision on the Yangon deal is only for tickets canceled by SWISS Airlines for the seven merged complaints/companions and tickets canceled by Jet Airways for one complainant and companions
- It's not about other carriers because each carrier submits different tariffs.
- If you are not one of the complainants or their companions above who were mentioned in the respective cases, you need to submit a case yourself for hearing.
- There's currently one person who is on Iberia for CTA decision, one can either wait for results or submit a complaint to CTA.

Result of the current case for LX in brief is:
- CTA found 5(F) in the tariff used to be unclear for canceling tickets on erroneously quoted fares.
- 5(F) is unjust and unreasonable and must be revised or taken down by July 9, 2013 (or SWISS can appeal by then)
- SWISS did not use its tariff correctly to cancel the tickets.
- SWISS must compensate one complainant's First Class ticket and any related expenses by July 18, 2013 provided with evidence.
- SWISS must transport other complainants (and their companions) in the original price charged with same booking class and routing by June 18, 2014.

Result of the current case for 9W in brief is:
- Tariff on file had no clauses for "erroneous fares" and was updated subsequently, which means it is not relevant to this event
- Therefore, 9W is to reinstate the tickets with a 1-year validity for transport between the same points and the same booking class.


CTA official news can be read here for general overview of the case.

Actual CTA case review can be found here for reference should you wish to file a complaint.

If you have a similar case that's with SWISS, you need to file with CTA to get a result through informal process first before it gets to formal process. The entire procedure can take up to 3 months for each and the result may not be same cause it's case-by-base and the reviewer of the case can be different.

To file an informal complaint with CTA, see here. Click through all of the pages to get to the online form for the informal complaint. Or click here.

To file a formal complaint after informal complaint has been closed, see here. Continue on to the next page to see the address or email address for the formal complaint.

The July 17th and 18th responses from LX can be found here:
Other Letters:


Feel free to add dates, flights, etc., in order to plan DOs, etc.

Aug 4: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612

Aug 5: ICN-SFO (UA892)
Jason8612

Aug 7: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612

Aug 11: ICN-NRT-ORD (UA78, UA882)
Jason8612

Aug 14: BOS-IAD-NRT-ICN (UA285, UA803, UA79)
Deltspygt

Aug 19: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA352)
Deltspygt

Oct 1: UA433-UA893
JeredF +1

Oct 8: UA892-UA242
JeredF +1

Oct 9: BOS-SFO-ICN (UA433, UA893)
BigJC

Oct 13: ICN-NRT-ORD-BOS (UA78, UA882, UA744)
BigJC

Oct 21: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
Sterndogg +1
flyerdude88 (SFO - ICN portion only)

Oct 23: ICN - SFO UA 892
flyerdude88

Oct 27: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-BOS UA286
Sterndogg +1

Nov 05: BOS-ORD UA521, ORD-NRT UA881
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1

Nov 11: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-IAD UA727
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1

Nov 26: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-NRT UA837, NRT-ICN UA79
thepla

Nov 27: BOS-ORD-NRT-ICN (UA501, UA881, UA196)
BigJC+1

Nov 29: Planning 2 days in TPE, been to ICN
thepla

Dec 1: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-ORD UA698, ORD-BOS UA961
thepla

Dec 1: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA822)
BigJC+1

Dec 15: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
songzm

Dec 25: BOS-IAD UA285, IAD-NRT UA803, NRT-ICN UA79
Dinoscool3 +2

Dec 30: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA444
songzm

Dec 31: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA770
Dinoscool3 +2

Jan 11: BOS-SFO UA1523, Jan 12: SFO-ICN UA893
margarita girl

Jan 12: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
Zebranz

14 Jan: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
ORDOGG

19 Jan: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-ORD UA698 to ORD-BOS UA961
ORDOGG

Jan 22: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA500
margarita girl

Feb 5: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA242
Zebranz



CMB-DFW EY F

FARE IS GONE

FARE RULES (thanks to SQ421)
FRTLK Fare Rules (RT)
FOWLK Fare Rules (OW)

WHEN ARE YOU FLYING?
Feel free to add any additional cities you're leaving from!
Please slot yourselves in!!!

ex-CMB
Feb

Mar
8 - Darmajaya
12 - Thaidai
22 - Deadinabsentia

Apr
21 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir
26 - tahsir21

May
28 - Upperdeck744
29 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)

Jun
12 - lelee

Jul
7 - HansGolden +6
8 - arcticbull + 1
11 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: SIN-CMB, DFW-MCI)
25 - Tycosiao
30 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: MCI-DFW, CMB-SIN)

Aug
17 - DC777Fan
26 - Yi Yang
31 - dcas

Sep

Oct

Nov
8 - harryhv
29 - stephem+4

Dec
6 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. roastpuff , JFKEZE (UL Code-share)
7 - DWFI
10 - jlisi984 + dad (CMB-AUH-DFW)
21 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)

ex-AUH
Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr
27 - RICHKLHS

May


Jun
29 - yerffej201

Jul
9 - HansGolden +6
27 - Tycosiao

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov
30 - stephem+4 (to JFK)

Dec
7 - JFKEZE, DWFI [EY161 nonstop]
9 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. Roastpuff

ex-DFW
Jan

Feb

Mar
14 - Thaidai
15 - zainman +1

Apr
25 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir

May

Jun

Jul

Aug
22 - arcticbull + 1

Sep
22 - bonsaisai (positioning flights ORD-DFW, CMB-SIN)


Oct

Nov
19 - harryhv->Paris

Dec
19 - Yi Yang, jona970318
24 - DWFI (EY160 nonstop)
26 - HansGolden +6 (CDG), LwoodY2K (AUH)
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] RGN First class comes back again!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2013, 9:58 pm
  #8986  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,859
Originally Posted by globaltravelers
so if swiss or any other EU carrier want to avoid DOT, or EU fines and regulations, they can unilaterally reroute you to your final destination, avoiding to fly through usa or EU? so the next time a volcano happens in europe, causing massive delays (not cancellation), the carriers will fly you through a different route, on different carriers even, to avoid touching EU and avoid the massive fines? even if you have a 23 hour scheduled stop / meeting somewhere in europe? even if your original ticket said your routing is through EU?
Why bother, when they can just axe the ticket saying it was an error?

Originally Posted by globaltravelers
IF it is true, then the regulations are useless, as airlines will unilaterally reroute passengers to avoid them, and regulations then needs to be re-defined.
There's a lot of possibilities of things going wrong, no way all can be identified and addressed in the regulations. Thats where common sense steps in, sometimes enforced by court.
Lack is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2013, 9:08 am
  #8987  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
As a lawyer, I think it is pretty reasonable for the DOT not to get involved in this one. Remember they did drop the hammer on KE, so they are not adverse in exercising power. I really do think that them failing to intervene on the part of the 8-miler UA tickets is bull.
colpuck is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 2:33 pm
  #8988  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the air
Programs: Occasional RTW club
Posts: 6,924
Phew.

I think I finally have liftoff!

I now have 7 months to figure out accomodations and so on......... where was that meetup thread
Pseudo Nim is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 3:04 pm
  #8989  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Programs: BA Silver, EY Gold, HH Diamond, IHG Plat
Posts: 12,210
Originally Posted by Pseudo Nim
Phew.

I think I finally have liftoff!

I now have 7 months to figure out accomodations and so on......... where was that meetup thread
Nice one. ^

Can you give us the story now?
onlysuites is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 3:10 pm
  #8990  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Penang, Malaysia
Programs: OZ *G, HHonors Gold, Aclub Plat
Posts: 1,025
Huh? Did the CTA come through??
calvinoeh is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 3:13 pm
  #8991  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the air
Programs: Occasional RTW club
Posts: 6,924
Originally Posted by onlysuites
Nice one. ^

Can you give us the story now?
Yup. So my ticket was issued by 9W on RGN-KUL-SIN-LHR-YUL. They cancelled it without even telling me - thank god I didn't book positioning - called AC to assign seats and found out from the confused-sounding agent. Filed with the CTA, took about 6 months including a month for mediation (where 9W refused mediation, but only after the time elapsed). CTA went on to rule in my favour. They directed 9W to issue a new ticket valid for 1 year at the same price I paid. So 9W issued a ticket for my original date (January)+365 days and told me its valid for 1 year and can be changed subject to a reprice. This was on Friday following protracted negotiations with them (I don't want to go in January - that was LAST year!!!), and the CTA basically telling them "wth. Behave." So I just received an email from them telling me they acquiesce to issue it on the exact date I requested. Phew. Drama solved.

I wanted them to reroute me to either convert AC to LH, or at least adjust the SQ flight to avoid two overnight connections, but despite the CTA saying they are fine with it, 9W refused. Oh well.

I wonder if, when I show up to SIN, I can try to standby to one of the earlier SQ flights? Mine will be at 9am, but the 23:00 or 01:00 would connect better...
Pseudo Nim is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 3:16 pm
  #8992  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Penang, Malaysia
Programs: OZ *G, HHonors Gold, Aclub Plat
Posts: 1,025
Originally Posted by Pseudo Nim
Yup. So my ticket was issued by 9W on RGN-KUL-SIN-LHR-YUL. They cancelled it without even telling me - thank god I didn't book positioning - called AC to assign seats and found out from the confused-sounding agent. Filed with the CTA, took about 6 months including a month for mediation (where 9W refused mediation, but only after the time elapsed). CTA went on to rule in my favour. They directed 9W to issue a new ticket valid for 1 year at the same price I paid. So 9W issued a ticket for my original date (January)+365 days and told me its valid for 1 year and can be changed subject to a reprice. This was on Friday following protracted negotiations with them (I don't want to go in January - that was LAST year!!!), and the CTA basically telling them "wth. Behave." So I just received an email from them telling me they acquiesce to issue it on the exact date I requested. Phew. Drama solved.

I wanted them to reroute me to either convert AC to LH, or at least adjust the SQ flight to avoid two overnight connections, but despite the CTA saying they are fine with it, 9W refused. Oh well.

I wonder if, when I show up to SIN, I can try to standby to one of the earlier SQ flights? Mine will be at 9am, but the 23:00 or 01:00 would connect better...
Now time for CTA to spank Swiss as well
calvinoeh is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 3:18 pm
  #8993  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the air
Programs: Occasional RTW club
Posts: 6,924
Originally Posted by calvinoeh
Now time for CTA to spank Swiss as well
They already have, though! But Swiss ignored the ruling.
Pseudo Nim is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 3:22 pm
  #8994  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Penang, Malaysia
Programs: OZ *G, HHonors Gold, Aclub Plat
Posts: 1,025
Originally Posted by Pseudo Nim
They already have, though! But Swiss ignored the ruling.
Isn't it that Swiss is "appealing" the ruling?
calvinoeh is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 3:45 pm
  #8995  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the air
Programs: Occasional RTW club
Posts: 6,924
Originally Posted by calvinoeh
Isn't it that Swiss is "appealing" the ruling?
Appealing, ignoring... semantics
Pseudo Nim is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 7:39 pm
  #8996  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: M&M
Posts: 997
Originally Posted by Pseudo Nim
I wonder if, when I show up to SIN, I can try to standby to one of the earlier SQ flights? Mine will be at 9am, but the 23:00 or 01:00 would connect better...
You don't have to standby, you can get it changed. As long as there is space and you're not adding a stopover it is fine, the price is locked after the first leg. Gratz!

And if someone refuses something you can complain to the CTA again.
FrankTalk is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 8:04 pm
  #8997  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the air
Programs: Occasional RTW club
Posts: 6,924
Originally Posted by FrankTalk
You don't have to standby, you can get it changed. As long as there is space and you're not adding a stopover it is fine, the price is locked after the first leg. Gratz!

And if someone refuses something you can complain to the CTA again.
ooooooooooooooooh i forgot about everything locking in after the first leg. good call! although i would lose book the cook i guess
Pseudo Nim is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 8:04 pm
  #8998  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA. UA 1K, reluctant but * best in class * DL FO/MM. Former BA jumpseat rider and scourge of Dilbertian management and apologists. As LX might - and do - say: "....an experienced frequent flyer of international airlines"
Posts: 3,386
Originally Posted by Pseudo Nim
Appealing, ignoring... semantics
Good on you ^ Give it to them!

It will be very satisfying if LX are required similarly by CTA to provide carriage as ticketed.
redtailshark is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 8:08 pm
  #8999  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the air
Programs: Occasional RTW club
Posts: 6,924
Originally Posted by redtailshark
Good on you ^ Give it to them!

It will be very satisfying if LX are required similarly by CTA to provide carriage as ticketed.
Technically, they already were. They are appealing and all that, but I can't see the CTA siding with them, I dunno.
Pseudo Nim is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2013, 10:32 pm
  #9000  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Programs: BA Silver, EY Gold, HH Diamond, IHG Plat
Posts: 12,210
Originally Posted by Pseudo Nim
Yup. So my ticket was issued by 9W on RGN-KUL-SIN-LHR-YUL. They cancelled it without even telling me - thank god I didn't book positioning - called AC to assign seats and found out from the confused-sounding agent. Filed with the CTA, took about 6 months including a month for mediation (where 9W refused mediation, but only after the time elapsed). CTA went on to rule in my favour. They directed 9W to issue a new ticket valid for 1 year at the same price I paid. So 9W issued a ticket for my original date (January)+365 days and told me its valid for 1 year and can be changed subject to a reprice. This was on Friday following protracted negotiations with them (I don't want to go in January - that was LAST year!!!), and the CTA basically telling them "wth. Behave." So I just received an email from them telling me they acquiesce to issue it on the exact date I requested. Phew. Drama solved.

I wanted them to reroute me to either convert AC to LH, or at least adjust the SQ flight to avoid two overnight connections, but despite the CTA saying they are fine with it, 9W refused. Oh well.

I wonder if, when I show up to SIN, I can try to standby to one of the earlier SQ flights? Mine will be at 9am, but the 23:00 or 01:00 would connect better...
Once again well done. I am glad you got it. There were a few that said nothing would happen and me and you were always positive from the start. ^
onlysuites is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.