Alitalia: LHR-FCO-LAX-HNL-LAX-JFK-FCO-LHR for $670
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Prague
Programs: AA Gold, *G (TK), AZ Gold
Posts: 33
Alitalia: LHR-FCO-LAX-HNL-LAX-JFK-FCO-LHR for $670
Hello my friends, I think this could be good Mileage Run for you. I find on Orbitz Alitalia tarif route:
LHR-FCO-LAX-HNL-ORD-FCO-LHR
LHR-FCO-ATL-HNL-LAX-NYC-FCO-LHR
LHR-ORD-LAX-HNL-LAX-NYC-FCO-LHR
All routes are available for $670. Partners are United, Delta.
A lot of dates at September. For ex: 7-14.9
Sorry for missing information about booking class ;-)
LHR-FCO-LAX-HNL-ORD-FCO-LHR
LHR-FCO-ATL-HNL-LAX-NYC-FCO-LHR
LHR-ORD-LAX-HNL-LAX-NYC-FCO-LHR
All routes are available for $670. Partners are United, Delta.
A lot of dates at September. For ex: 7-14.9
Sorry for missing information about booking class ;-)
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Currently in Bloomington, IN, but Normally NYC, CDG, and even POZ or wherever FT takes me.
Programs: Northwest Airlines. MTA pay-per-ride Metrocard; zero-balance Oyster card.
Posts: 14,022
UA? Really? AZ codeshares with UA? Or is this an Orbitz fare construct?
I can't imagine AZ codesharing with a *A carrier in N. America when they have all of DL's network available... or am i missing something?
I can't imagine AZ codesharing with a *A carrier in N. America when they have all of DL's network available... or am i missing something?
#4
Formerly known as fsa_ea
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Up in the Air
Programs: UA GS/1MM,AS 75k,NK GLD,AA 2MM,DL 2MM,LH FT,AY PLT,IC RA,FMT LT PLT,HYT GLB,HLT DIA,MRT GLD,HRTZ PC
Posts: 2,229
#5
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SJC/SFO/OAK
Programs: NW-PE (ret.) DL-Diamond & 1M, Hertz #1, UA-1P
Posts: 837
It's just an Orb, CT, etc. fare assemblage of ST and *A flights, not code-shares.
#6
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: RDU
Posts: 713
Nice find.
the fare basis is NLAPGB, it has a Saturday night minimum stay, 1 month maximum stay, and no day/time/season restrictions.
From my reading of the routing rules, the TATL segment needs to be on AZ, but the mainland/HNL segment(s) don't have a carrier requirement but MPM applies.
the fare basis is NLAPGB, it has a Saturday night minimum stay, 1 month maximum stay, and no day/time/season restrictions.
From my reading of the routing rules, the TATL segment needs to be on AZ, but the mainland/HNL segment(s) don't have a carrier requirement but MPM applies.
#7
Formerly known as fsa_ea
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Up in the Air
Programs: UA GS/1MM,AS 75k,NK GLD,AA 2MM,DL 2MM,LH FT,AY PLT,IC RA,FMT LT PLT,HYT GLB,HLT DIA,MRT GLD,HRTZ PC
Posts: 2,229
#8
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London-Nice
Programs: GGL
Posts: 1,425
#9
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CMH, sometimes AVP, formerly down the Shore
Programs: UA 1K/3MM, AA EXP/3MM, DL MM, former fan of TWA
Posts: 1,854
The ticketing carrier would not matter for the earning of miles (including status miles). But you would need to verify the booking class (Y, W, T, etc.) on the *A carrier to figure out if 100% miles would be earned.
#10
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SJC/SFO/OAK
Programs: NW-PE (ret.) DL-Diamond & 1M, Hertz #1, UA-1P
Posts: 837
CO: W
US: K
DL: T
AZ: N
AA: O
UA: V
Availability at least April through November.
ITA shows many more routes than seem to be bookable. Anyone see where to book transiting LAX on the return? This produces an all ST booking at $657.
Last edited by Desdinova; Apr 2, 2010 at 11:26 am
#11
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CMH, sometimes AVP, formerly down the Shore
Programs: UA 1K/3MM, AA EXP/3MM, DL MM, former fan of TWA
Posts: 1,854
Someone noted earlier that this is an MPM fare, rather than one with specific routing rules. So the following comment may not be relevant, but just in case...
AZ has notoriously liberal routing rules. You can kind of see it in the European route here - LHR to the US via Italy. It's just something they need to do to compete on these routes.
Well, I have historically found similar situations on the US side. Some of their fares are filed as being applicable from any US gateway. So one time I bought an AZ fare from Newark to London that routed through the AZ gateway in LAX (and then via Italy).
Again, this might not might not apply here (and I haven't tried anything) but it's just something to keep in mind while trying different things.
AZ has notoriously liberal routing rules. You can kind of see it in the European route here - LHR to the US via Italy. It's just something they need to do to compete on these routes.
Well, I have historically found similar situations on the US side. Some of their fares are filed as being applicable from any US gateway. So one time I bought an AZ fare from Newark to London that routed through the AZ gateway in LAX (and then via Italy).
Again, this might not might not apply here (and I haven't tried anything) but it's just something to keep in mind while trying different things.
#12
Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: AB Platinum (AB4EVA), IHG Diamond, Dominos Gold
Posts: 956
I can't get this priced at all... Could someone give me a hint what Multicity Segments you're searching for?
Even if I get a similar trip on AZ stock, it prices out at several grand...
Even if I get a similar trip on AZ stock, it prices out at several grand...
#14
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SJC/SFO/OAK
Programs: NW-PE (ret.) DL-Diamond & 1M, Hertz #1, UA-1P
Posts: 837
Simple RT on CT or Orb. should reveal it.
In ITA you likely need to add connection cities (in proper order).
#15
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: RDU
Posts: 713
Someone noted earlier that this is an MPM fare, rather than one with specific routing rules. So the following comment may not be relevant, but just in case...
AZ has notoriously liberal routing rules. You can kind of see it in the European route here - LHR to the US via Italy. It's just something they need to do to compete on these routes.
Well, I have historically found similar situations on the US side. Some of their fares are filed as being applicable from any US gateway. So one time I bought an AZ fare from Newark to London that routed through the AZ gateway in LAX (and then via Italy).
Again, this might not might not apply here (and I haven't tried anything) but it's just something to keep in mind while trying different things.
AZ has notoriously liberal routing rules. You can kind of see it in the European route here - LHR to the US via Italy. It's just something they need to do to compete on these routes.
Well, I have historically found similar situations on the US side. Some of their fares are filed as being applicable from any US gateway. So one time I bought an AZ fare from Newark to London that routed through the AZ gateway in LAX (and then via Italy).
Again, this might not might not apply here (and I haven't tried anything) but it's just something to keep in mind while trying different things.
ROUTING C002 FROM-TO LON-AP/AZ-ROM-AP/AZ-MIL-MIA/CHI/BOS/
NYC/ATL-DL/AZ-ABE-*MPM*-HNL*
FROM-TO LON-AP/AZ-MIL/ROM-MIA/CHI/BOS/NYC/ATL-
DL/AZ-ABE-*MPM*-HNL*
FROM-TO LON-AP/AZ-MIL-AP/AZ-ROM-MIA/CHI/BOS/
NYC/ATL-DL/AZ-ABE-*MPM*-HNL*
FROM-TO LON-AP/AZ-ROM-AP/AZ-MIL-MIA/CHI/BOS/
NYC/ATL-DL/AZ-ABQ-*MPM*-HNL*
FROM-TO LON-AP/AZ-MIL/ROM-MIA/CHI/BOS/NYC/ATL-
DL/AZ-ABQ-*MPM*-HNL*
FROM-TO LON-AP/AZ-MIL-AP/AZ-ROM-MIA/CHI/BOS/
NYC/ATL-DL/AZ-ABQ-*MPM*-HNL*
etc.