Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Continue to fly YX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2008, 2:53 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tucson
Programs: Delta Platinum; Harrah's Diamond; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 950
Continue to fly YX?

Although I feel really bad for the employees of Midwest Airlines, I am having a hard time convincing myself to continue to fly them. With only 15% of seats being "Signature Service" starting in October, a lot of RJ routes and the cutbacks in cities served, my loyalty is definitely waning. I have booked several trips on other airlines between now and the end of year and may not make MME again. I wish YX the best of luck, it appears they will need it.
Seth is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2008, 4:44 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Programs: HHonors Diamond, Marriott Platinum, National Exec Elite, Delta
Posts: 505
Well, that's one more Signature seat for me then....

Seriously, have you seen a reduction in quality of service? on time arrivals? incidents?

And by the way.. the Signature ratio on a 717 is 40 Signature Seats and 59 Saver. (41% Signature according to my calculations)

I don't believe that YX has done anything to lose my loyalty and I will continue to fly them exclusively when I go up to MKE.
rnovak is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2008, 4:58 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by rnovak
Well, that's one more Signature seat for me then....

Seriously, have you seen a reduction in quality of service? on time arrivals? incidents?

And by the way.. the Signature ratio on a 717 is 40 Signature Seats and 59 Saver. (41% Signature according to my calculations)

I don't believe that YX has done anything to lose my loyalty and I will continue to fly them exclusively when I go up to MKE.
The 15% number was referenced in a recent Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article, which factors in all YX flying, including Skywest and the upcoming Republic E170s. Much of the mainline flying was either dropped (due to the retirement of the MD-80s) or is being transitioned to the E170s, which will not have Signature seating. The remaining signature seating on the 717s will only account for 15% of all the seats being offered by Midwest come October.

Last edited by newsmanhoss; Sep 10, 2008 at 6:37 pm Reason: sp
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2008, 5:58 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Originally Posted by rnovak
Well, that's one more Signature seat for me then....

Seriously, have you seen a reduction in quality of service? on time arrivals? incidents?

And by the way.. the Signature ratio on a 717 is 40 Signature Seats and 59 Saver. (41% Signature according to my calculations)

I don't believe that YX has done anything to lose my loyalty and I will continue to fly them exclusively when I go up to MKE.
Are you prepared to fly an E170 WITHOUT signature seats?
RSVP is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2008, 9:05 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,800
Originally Posted by RSVP
Are you prepared to fly an E170 WITHOUT signature seats?
The E170 is certainly not the 717, but it is still a very comfortable plane to fly on nonetheless. In fact, I prefer the E170 over the 737 and some A319/A320 series. Plus, you still have the 2x2 seating.
BlueHorseShoe2000 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2008, 9:08 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
Originally Posted by Seth
Although I feel really bad for the employees of Midwest Airlines, I am having a hard time convincing myself to continue to fly them. With only 15% of seats being "Signature Service" starting in October, a lot of RJ routes and the cutbacks in cities served, my loyalty is definitely waning. I have booked several trips on other airlines between now and the end of year and may not make MME again. I wish YX the best of luck, it appears they will need it.
The decision is of course a personal one based on your flying patterns and destinations, corporate contracts (if you primarily fly business), and similar questions.

Generally people, of course, tend to focus on a single carrier or two to accumulate miles in just a few programs and achieve elite status. Assuming you're in MKE, should you still fly on Midwest? Let's look at a couple key items with Midwest:

(a) Certainly Midwest will have fewer flights with Signature seats, and now an upgrade fee will be necessary for get the larger seat on flights where they have them. However most other airlines at MKE don't have premium seats on most (or any) of their MKE flights. And the two which do have premium seats...AirTran and Northwest...charge more to upgrade than Midwest does. Midwest will no longer offer a premium seat for free, but that change does not make them worse than the competition, does it?

(b) Midwest has definitely dropped some destinations, but they still fly nonstop year-round to far more destinations from MKE than anyone else.

(c) Midwest's agreement with Northwest means that you can still earn Midwest miles if you have to fly somewhere Midwest does not, or conversly, if you prefer to earn Northwest miles you can still fly Midwest when it is advantageous. The airline with the 2nd most nonstop destinations from Mitchell -- AirTran -- does not have the same ability. If you need to fly to Hartford or Birmingham or London, for example, you cannot earn within their program.

It's certainly a personal decision based on your own circumstances. If you've sworn off Northwest, for example, then the FF partnership is not helpful to you. But in general switching to other airlines means most destinations are connecting flights, and most flights (except NW and FL) are all-coach seating.
knope2001 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2008, 9:34 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
Have you seen the amount of programs that I belong to My advice to you is to use Midwest when it is convenient and don't fly them when it is not. I may fly Midwest SEA to MKE through MCI if the price is right but I am not going to pay $700 for a ticket on Midwest vs flying another carrier for a cheaper fair. I am not stupid. They cut the only direct "year round" flight between MKE and SEA. I don't owe them anything.
Tim34 is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2008, 6:10 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by Tim34
Have you seen the amount of programs that I belong to My advice to you is to use Midwest when it is convenient and don't fly them when it is not. I may fly Midwest SEA to MKE through MCI if the price is right but I am not going to pay $700 for a ticket on Midwest vs flying another carrier for a cheaper fair. I am not stupid. They cut the only direct "year round" flight between MKE and SEA. I don't owe them anything.
Midwest did not cut a year-round flight. They had only flown that route on a seasonal basis to begin with. THe traffic on that route drops of steeply during the winter.
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2008, 6:17 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by knope2001
But in general switching to other airlines means most destinations are connecting flights, and most flights (except NW and FL) are all-coach seating.
This is a minor point, but I believe USAirways nonstop service MKE-PHX also offers premium seating (on the former America West route) and a small portion of Delta's nonstop flights to ATL are also on mainline aircraft with premium seating.
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2008, 8:00 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
Originally Posted by newsmanhoss
Midwest did not cut a year-round flight. They had only flown that route on a seasonal basis to begin with. THe traffic on that route drops of steeply during the winter.
That is not true. That route did fly November - early January. They only stopped the route for a month and a half. I would not call that a seasonal route.
Tim34 is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2008, 9:01 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: BDL
Programs: NWA Platinum, HHonors Diamond, SPG, YX, AA
Posts: 5,351
I don't think I'll be flying YX again.

YX made the business decision to sell me tickets that they now won't honor and screw me over. I can't see how I can trust them with my business again.
MKEbound is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2008, 9:02 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,800
Originally Posted by Tim34
That is not true. That route did fly November - early January. They only stopped the route for a month and a half. I would not call that a seasonal route.
Midwest dropped MKE-SEA during January and February of 2008. Loads on the route dropped-off a cliff from October 2007 and onwards. It's very much a seasonal route.

Before the decision was made to retire the MD80s, Midwest had planned to fly MKE-SEA from March to early September only.
BlueHorseShoe2000 is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2008, 1:03 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,912
Originally Posted by knope2001
(a) Certainly Midwest will have fewer flights with Signature seats, and now an upgrade fee will be necessary for get the larger seat on flights where they have them. However most other airlines at MKE don't have premium seats on most (or any) of their MKE flights. And the two which do have premium seats...AirTran and Northwest...charge more to upgrade than Midwest does. Midwest will no longer offer a premium seat for free, but that change does not make them worse than the competition, does it?
This is not the total picture. Northwest has very generous upgrades for its elites for free. This may change with the Delta takeover but it is true for the moment.
hazelrah is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2008, 8:49 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 54
I wouldn't bother choosing Midwest anymore unless their fares are cheaper than anyone else. They screwed Milwaukee and it's employees over last year by not going with AirTran. If the fares are the same as Midwest, I might even fly a different airline to thumb my nose at their management decisions.
FLYNM is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2008, 2:20 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: TPA-MKE-PHX
Programs: Ex DL-DM. MM. TWA-Aviator Plat. HHonors-DVIP, MR-Gold. Nat-Emerald. Avis Chairmn.
Posts: 1,925
Originally Posted by FLYNM
I wouldn't bother choosing Midwest anymore unless their fares are cheaper than anyone else. They screwed Milwaukee and it's employees over last year by not going with AirTran. If the fares are the same as Midwest, I might even fly a different airline to thumb my nose at their management decisions.
They didn't screw me. I got more for my shares than AirTran was offering. I came out a winner.
tvnwz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.