Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Midwest Restructuring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2008 | 5:45 am
  #16  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
Additional info from June 14th edition of Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=762013
mke9499 is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2008 | 8:40 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MKE
Programs: Midwest Miles, AirTran A+ Rewards
Posts: 1,445
Originally Posted by blehman
Overall it's fairly nice. Where they did goof is not significantly improving food service(that also could be said for concourse E). At the heart of it Milwaukee and the state needs to consider a new terminal.
MKE has just approved the construction of two new Concourses F & G but it is dependent on passenger growth as to what year construction would start.
flyYX is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2008 | 12:00 pm
  #18  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,413
Originally Posted by blehman
Overall it's fairly nice. Where they did goof is not significantly improving food service(that also could be said for concourse E). At the heart of it Milwaukee and the state needs to consider a new terminal.
The County Board has approved a new food and concession contract, so you will see some additional vendors within the next year. There will be a mix of local and national vendors, including Bartolotta's, Alterra, Baja Fresh and others.

The airport has adopted a master plan for two additional concourses, an expanded parking structure and an additional runway. While those items are in the plan, no timetable has been set. Depending on passenger traffic (which in the current environment will probably not rise as fast as projected), the expansion may never happen. But, if traffic continues to increase, the projects could be started within the next 10 to 20 years. No major expansion projects are in the near future for MKE.

I believe they'll be replacing the carpet within the main concession mall and ticketing/baggage claim areas later this year, for what that's worth
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2008 | 4:33 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: YX
Posts: 170
Originally Posted by blehman
Would you stop being such a tool.
Blehnman, you need to come out from your multiple identities you hide behind here at Flyertalk.
YX802 is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 8:28 am
  #20  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: IAD
Posts: 6,453
So Midwest hired the same firm that NW used for their restructuring?

Shocking.
whlinder is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 9:06 am
  #21  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
Originally Posted by YX802
Blehnman, you need to come out from your multiple identities you hide behind here at Flyertalk.
Tool bag

This could get interesting. I wonder if Midwest will stop non stop service from MKE-LAX? They could add 1 or 2 717's to LAX from MKE with a stop in Kansas City. I doubt the frequent fliers would care that much. Maybe Midwest can codeshare that route with NWA and let them take that route over. Either that or Airtran, Delta or United will pick up the slack.
Tim34 is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 5:15 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: YX
Posts: 170
Originally Posted by Tim34
Tool bag .
Just consider the source. blehman aka midwestairsux.
YX802 is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 7:11 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,913
Originally Posted by YX802
This is the Midwest forum, we wouldn't know about Concourse C, Traitor!
I follow this board because Midwest needs accountability; everything Air Tran said about Midwest was spot on- this needs to be remembered.

Just as I predicted, big changes in store for Midwest before the summer is out. Hoekseama is just continuing to play games with his "study" Honestly, at this point were I Midwest management I don't know what I'd do/ CRJ-200s and MD-80s are a toxic mix.

Concourse C is nice, but it has very limited food services.

Last edited by hazelrah; Jun 15, 2008 at 7:16 pm
hazelrah is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 7:36 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MKE
Programs: Midwest Miles, AirTran A+ Rewards
Posts: 1,445
Originally Posted by hazelrah
everything Air Tran said about Midwest was spot on- this needs to be remembered.
Maybe in mid 2007 they were half right. But today they are totally wrong and I suspect very happy the merger with Midwest did not happen.
flyYX is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 8:09 pm
  #25  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
Originally Posted by hazelrah
I follow this board because Midwest needs accountability; everything Air Tran said about Midwest was spot on- this needs to be remembered.

Just as I predicted, big changes in store for Midwest before the summer is out. Hoekseama is just continuing to play games with his "study" Honestly, at this point were I Midwest management I don't know what I'd do/ CRJ-200s and MD-80s are a toxic mix.

Concourse C is nice, but it has very limited food services.
What the hell is Hoekseama going to do? You can't shrink to profitability (as the article states)? They have already cut a bunch of flights.
Tim34 is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 5:21 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,913
Originally Posted by flyYX
Maybe in mid 2007 they were half right. But today they are totally wrong and I suspect very happy the merger with Midwest did not happen.
Air Tran said that the Midwest business model was broke and would fail (survival is not enough). A regional airline catering to the Milwaukee business community can not compete against legacies; it can not compete against LCCs.

It's a shame because Midwest had some positive qualities, it can just not reinvent itself to compete.
hazelrah is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 5:32 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,913
Originally Posted by Tim34
What the hell is Hoekseama going to do? You can't shrink to profitability (as the article states)? They have already cut a bunch of flights.
1) Get rid of every MD-80

2) Cancel every CRJ-200 flight where 80% load factors can not be achieved.

3) Raise fares

5) Furlough employees
hazelrah is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 6:05 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MKE
Programs: Midwest Miles, AirTran A+ Rewards
Posts: 1,445
Originally Posted by hazelrah
1) Get rid of every MD-80

2) Cancel every CRJ-200 flight where 80% load factors can not be achieved.

3) Raise fares

5) Furlough employees
Sounds about right.
flyYX is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 5:25 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: YX
Posts: 170
>>>>>
YX802 is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 5:30 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: YX
Posts: 170
Originally Posted by hazelrah
I follow this board because Midwest needs accountability; everything Air Tran said about Midwest was spot on- this needs to be remembered.
Here we go again, AirTran was dead WRONG from the start.

Undervalued offer.

Unsustainable plan for Milwaukee. That has become obvious with their seasonal service they are offering. Were they planning on offering 12 daily flights to ATL year round? Fly to either coast, but only do it seasonally.

Furthermore, I doubt they had the resources to close a deal.
YX802 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.