![]() |
Additional info from June 14th edition of Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=762013 |
Originally Posted by blehman
(Post 9878159)
Overall it's fairly nice. Where they did goof is not significantly improving food service(that also could be said for concourse E). At the heart of it Milwaukee and the state needs to consider a new terminal.
|
Originally Posted by blehman
(Post 9878159)
Overall it's fairly nice. Where they did goof is not significantly improving food service(that also could be said for concourse E). At the heart of it Milwaukee and the state needs to consider a new terminal.
The airport has adopted a master plan for two additional concourses, an expanded parking structure and an additional runway. While those items are in the plan, no timetable has been set. Depending on passenger traffic (which in the current environment will probably not rise as fast as projected), the expansion may never happen. But, if traffic continues to increase, the projects could be started within the next 10 to 20 years. No major expansion projects are in the near future for MKE. I believe they'll be replacing the carpet within the main concession mall and ticketing/baggage claim areas later this year, for what that's worth ;) |
Originally Posted by blehman
(Post 9878155)
Would you stop being such a tool.
|
So Midwest hired the same firm that NW used for their restructuring?
Shocking. |
Originally Posted by YX802
(Post 9880079)
Blehnman, you need to come out from your multiple identities you hide behind here at Flyertalk.
This could get interesting. I wonder if Midwest will stop non stop service from MKE-LAX? They could add 1 or 2 717's to LAX from MKE with a stop in Kansas City. I doubt the frequent fliers would care that much. Maybe Midwest can codeshare that route with NWA and let them take that route over. Either that or Airtran, Delta or United will pick up the slack. |
Originally Posted by Tim34
(Post 9882197)
Tool bag :D:D.
|
Originally Posted by YX802
(Post 9878128)
This is the Midwest forum, we wouldn't know about Concourse C, Traitor!
Just as I predicted, big changes in store for Midwest before the summer is out. Hoekseama is just continuing to play games with his "study" Honestly, at this point were I Midwest management I don't know what I'd do/ CRJ-200s and MD-80s are a toxic mix. Concourse C is nice, but it has very limited food services. |
Originally Posted by hazelrah
(Post 9884457)
everything Air Tran said about Midwest was spot on- this needs to be remembered.
|
Originally Posted by hazelrah
(Post 9884457)
I follow this board because Midwest needs accountability; everything Air Tran said about Midwest was spot on- this needs to be remembered.
Just as I predicted, big changes in store for Midwest before the summer is out. Hoekseama is just continuing to play games with his "study" Honestly, at this point were I Midwest management I don't know what I'd do/ CRJ-200s and MD-80s are a toxic mix. Concourse C is nice, but it has very limited food services. |
Originally Posted by flyYX
(Post 9884562)
Maybe in mid 2007 they were half right. But today they are totally wrong and I suspect very happy the merger with Midwest did not happen.
It's a shame because Midwest had some positive qualities, it can just not reinvent itself to compete. |
Originally Posted by Tim34
(Post 9884689)
What the hell is Hoekseama going to do? You can't shrink to profitability (as the article states)? They have already cut a bunch of flights. :confused:
2) Cancel every CRJ-200 flight where 80% load factors can not be achieved. 3) Raise fares 5) Furlough employees |
Originally Posted by hazelrah
(Post 9886196)
1) Get rid of every MD-80
2) Cancel every CRJ-200 flight where 80% load factors can not be achieved. 3) Raise fares 5) Furlough employees |
>>>>>
|
Originally Posted by hazelrah
(Post 9884457)
I follow this board because Midwest needs accountability; everything Air Tran said about Midwest was spot on- this needs to be remembered.
Undervalued offer. Unsustainable plan for Milwaukee. That has become obvious with their seasonal service they are offering. Were they planning on offering 12 daily flights to ATL year round? Fly to either coast, but only do it seasonally. Furthermore, I doubt they had the resources to close a deal. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:08 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.