![]() |
It'll be there tonight for a NAA benefit dinner; there are a bunch of signs up for the event. It's very clearly visible from the Mt Vernon Trail and/or the road to/from Economy Parking. I took this photo through the fence.
|
Originally Posted by drewguy
(Post 18531063)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theboei...ny/7153000661/
Think we can get the perimeter rules loosened to allow for some new routes: DCA-LHR DCA-FRA DCA-NRT ? |
Cheers paytonc!
If any of you can get to the Economy Parking lot or the Mt. Vernon trail, the 787 is truly a sight to be seen. As I was a bit disapointed as I was commuting [on foot] home on Tuesday, only to see the tail of the plane, I was ridiculously surprised to see the entire plane, super close to the trail and basically next to all the cars parked in the Economy parking lot. I'll be watching from my place here that overlooks the monuments & the flight path [to the North] and hopefully if the winds are the same as they were this evening, I'll be able to see the 787 leave - and those that are at Gravelly or Long Bridge will be able to see it too! -jeremy |
there should be a decent breeze from the NW. should take off on 1/19 to the north. if the breeze picks up more than expected, will take off on15/33(i don't know which runway number one uses in which direction)
|
Current traffic is landing and taking off on Runway 1 to the north with some express traffic landing on 33.
|
Flight is now showing up in Flight Aware: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/B...500Z/KDCA/KIAD
Estimated 11:10 departure. |
Originally Posted by FBKSan
(Post 18555217)
Flight is now showing up in Flight Aware: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/B...500Z/KDCA/KIAD
Estimated 11:10 departure. |
It just took off!
|
I watched it from Gravelly Point. It was VERY quiet and only needed about half the runway before rotation.
I could have sworn it said US Airways Express on the side! ;) |
Originally Posted by DCA writer
(Post 18555305)
And an estimated 11:48 arrival at IAD. [Please add your own minimum-500-EQM joke.]
|
They probably sent it out almost empty to keep the runway requirements minimal. It's en route to DFW*, the last stop on the tour.
* home of a certain airline which will paint their carbon planes to look like chromed aluminum, but then again I shouldn't complain since I own an aluminum bicycle painted to look like matte carbon. |
Originally Posted by geo1005
(Post 18556141)
I watched it from Gravelly Point. It was VERY quiet and only needed about half the runway before rotation.
I could have sworn it said US Airways Express on the side! ;) One thing I didn't expect: From the ground, the 787 doesn't look that big. I think it's because the relative size of the engines to the fuselage isn't that far off from a 737--even if the 737's fuselage can't be much wider than a 787 engine. |
When it was at the beginning of the runway it looked big. After takeoff it didn't look that big. I stuck around and got to tell some people they missed seeing it by 5-10 minutes. :p. I'm a lousy photographer with a lousy camera (iPhone 4) but the pic I got was small because it was so high by the time it got to where I was. It did seem to not use much runway.
|
Originally Posted by DeafFlyer
(Post 18556847)
When it was at the beginning of the runway it looked big. After takeoff it didn't look that big. I stuck around and got to tell some people they missed seeing it by 5-10 minutes. :p. I'm a lousy photographer with a lousy camera (iPhone 4) but the pic I got was small because it was so high by the time it got to where I was. It did seem to not use much runway.
i may have even seen you and not realized it I agree the take off was not a big deal |
Originally Posted by DCA writer
(Post 18556725)
Yes, exceptionally quiet and fast off the runway--the landing gear were already stowed away by the time it was over Gravelly Point. (If any of you stuck around for another five minutes, you would have witnessed the contrasting example of an AA DC-9 that needed nearly the entire runway to thunder its way into the air.)
One thing I didn't expect: From the ground, the 787 doesn't look that big. I think it's because the relative size of the engines to the fuselage isn't that far off from a 737--even if the 737's fuselage can't be much wider than a 787 engine. And yes, the 787 didn't look massive to me, but definitely bigger than most planes I see at DCA (naturally) and the wings to me didn't look as curved as I'd expected them to. Still, a beautiful sight that I wish could happen all the time here at Reagan, but of course - we get the smaller planes, albeit with the best looks from the airport in all of America of course. -jeremy |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:38 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.