Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Marriott | Rewards
Reload this Page >

What's the differnce between a JW Marriott and a regular Marriott?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What's the differnce between a JW Marriott and a regular Marriott?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 5:40 am
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
What's the differnce between a JW Marriott and a regular Marriott?

I've always wondered about this.
whirledtraveler is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 5:49 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: AAEXP 3+MM, Marriott Plt and Plt for life, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 414
The level of service is usually better. They have better amenities. Higher end dining and nicer spas. I was told at one stay that these properties are the only properties owned entirely by Mr. Marriott and the standards are higher. They are usually at least $100 more then any nearby regular Marriott too.
flyinghome is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 6:44 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Programs: AA-exp, 4MM, MR-plat, Hertz-PC, WN-CP
Posts: 423
Bathrooms are usually nicer - seperate tub and shower, marble, larger. Service seems more personal. I always think of the middle ground between fs Marriott and Ritz-Carlton.
Sprite is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 7:04 am
  #4  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan USA
Programs: Marriott lifetime Titanium, Delta Platinum
Posts: 5,485
The standards for the brands are different, but the reality is that the comparison depends more on the particular property than on the brand. I've stayed at Rens and Marriotts that outclassed nearby JW's and vice-versa.
ohmark is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 7:28 am
  #5  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
Programs: DL: 3.8 MM, Marriott: Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 24,575
Originally Posted by Sprite
Bathrooms are usually nicer - seperate tub and shower, marble, larger. Service seems more personal. I always think of the middle ground between fs Marriott and Ritz-Carlton.
That's my thinking as well.

We were staying at the Wailea Beach Marriott in Maui last month and asked about the rumor that it was being converted to a JW. We were told that that was the original plan but it seemed they couldn't retrofit the new rooms for a separate tub and shower. So that negated them becoming a JW.

Or at least that's the rumor.
Cholula is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 7:38 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Washington DC
Programs: Marriott Rewards, Delta, United, Southwest, USAirways
Posts: 8
Originally Posted by flyinghome
The level of service is usually better. They have better amenities. Higher end dining and nicer spas. I was told at one stay that these properties are the only properties owned entirely by Mr. Marriott and the standards are higher. They are usually at least $100 more then any nearby regular Marriott too.
that is not correct
flying cow is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 9:23 am
  #7  
Moderator, Marriott Bonvoy & FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McKinney, TX, USA
Programs: United Silver; AA Plat/2MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Hilton Gold
Posts: 11,775
Here are some threads from a couple of years ago where the "JW" distinction was discussed, What's with the JW Marriott Properties?? and What, specifically, is the difference between a "JW" and a regular Marriott?. I'm not sure that anything truly definitive was ever really found in those threads, but they both have some good info in them.

Also, if you check out Marriott's website here, Marriott seems to be "marketing" the JW brand as less of a business hotel and more of a luxery hotel. This matches some of what was brought out here and in the other threads.
hhoope01 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 5:48 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Some place in this wonderful world (usually at 39,000 ft in seat 1C)
Programs: CO Gold Elite / NW Gold Elite
Posts: 13,747
Originally Posted by Sprite
Bathrooms are usually nicer - seperate tub and shower, marble, larger. Service seems more personal. I always think of the middle ground between fs Marriott and Ritz-Carlton.
the above is probably the best way to look at it, the original JW was actually developed as a tribute to JWM Senior and later developed into a brand to compete with Ritz-Carlton but never achieved that goal, it has settled into the middle ground
socrates is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 12:39 am
  #9  
30 Countries Visited
60 Nights
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CVG
Programs: DL 3MM, AA 0.0 (US .975), Marriott Lifetime Plat, Nurburgring in 8:29
Posts: 2,304
I'd have to agree that the bathrooms are the biggest and most obvious difference as well as the staff. I've stayed at a few J.W.s but the only city where I've stayed in just about all the Marriott properties would be Denver. Comparing them all I'd have to say that the Marriott City Center and J.W. are above and beyond better than the Renaissance.

The MCC and JW in Denver I'd almost rank as a tie but it depends on what you're looking for. The MCC is far larger and subsequently has more too offer for the added guests, but the rooms themselves are pretty on par. The JW on the other hand has 1/3 the rooms and ergo about 1/3 the "communal" space, but it's noticably "better"... Better lighting, more pleasing to the eye... (Reminds me a bit of the W on Union Square in NYC.) The room was equal to the MCC, but the bathroom... Holy cow.

For the sake of arguement, here are three different Marriott brands that I would say tie in respects to what I got at the JW when you add the "cool" factor. (this is room ONLY, not the bathroom.) The Renaissance Cleveland, Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown and as I mentioned the Denver Marriott City Center. Each of those three had equally intriguing rooms but the bathroom in the JW, as well as the service staff were just in a league of their own.
photojojo is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 4:54 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rye, New York, USA
Posts: 148
I believe I once read one of the differences was in the employee to guest ratio.
jmposner is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 10:15 pm
  #11  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ATL
Programs: DL SkyMiles, MR, HH, ICH/PC, Avis Pref., Hertz Gold
Posts: 2,897
Originally Posted by socrates
the above is probably the best way to look at it, the original JW was actually developed as a tribute to JWM Senior and later developed into a brand to compete with Ritz-Carlton but never achieved that goal, it has settled into the middle ground
Which has been my experience. The JW's where I've stayed have been very nice full-service Marriotts. I have not had the good fortune to stay at a JW property that has the grand bathrooms that others are raving about. Ritz-Carltons they ain't .
keeton is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 8:32 pm
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DFW
Programs: AAdvantage
Posts: 746
I stayed at the JW in DC and didn't really notice much difference.
jaginger is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 9:33 pm
  #13  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Programs: Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by jaginger
I stayed at the JW in DC and didn't really notice much difference.
I too have stayed on the club floor of the Penn Ave JW in DC. I happen to remember the fact that the bathroom was as small as a regular marriott (if not smaller) and did not have the seperate tub/shower.

I hate to say the reason I remember it vividly is because I was suffering the flu and was feeling quite clostophobic.

Anyone want to venture a guess how the DC location earns it distinction?
jonathansullivan is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2007 | 5:19 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Some place in this wonderful world (usually at 39,000 ft in seat 1C)
Programs: CO Gold Elite / NW Gold Elite
Posts: 13,747
Originally Posted by jonathansullivan
Anyone want to venture a guess how the DC location earns it distinction?
See my earlier post....DC is #1 in the brand extension
socrates is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2007 | 5:32 am
  #15  
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DCA, EGE, IAD
Programs: MR LTT, BA Gold, AA LTP, UA Silver
Posts: 6,093
Originally Posted by jonathansullivan
Anyone want to venture a guess how the DC location earns it distinction?
As Socrates stated, it is the original JW Marriott and as such holds that name for namesake, and not for JW standards which were developed after its existence. So it is kind of fathered/grandfathered to the JW name.
aaupgrade is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.