Originally Posted by ericdabbs
(Post 23656314)
Did you schedule the payment correctly on OV? The day you scheduled the payment has to be the same day its being charged (ex: Today is 10/10, you have to schedule a payment that is being charged on 10/10 which is typically 3 business days out. In this case I had to select 10/15). So you are sure you scheduled it correctly?
Not to mention the several posts the last couple of days about OV failing in simple debit transactions at brick and mortar locations. |
Originally Posted by Brugge
(Post 23656691)
......As someone using OV at WM, I don't think it was out of line to ask if other types of cards are working much better than OV......
|
Asking about non-OV is perfectly valid for a discussion like this, for the troubleshooting aspect of OV not working, if nothing else.
|
Originally Posted by bigugly
(Post 23656774)
Asking about non-OV is perfectly valid for a discussion like this, for the troubleshooting aspect of OV not working, if nothing else.
|
Originally Posted by hamokmonky
(Post 23656384)
Well, for one this is a thread about the OV and not about other cards. For two, other cards have never stopped working, and do not have continuing problems like the OV, so why would we report something that has always worked and is not broken, as currently working??
|
Just loaded 6 OV at Kate (3 cards and then 10 min wait). 2 cards took 2 wipes and 4 of them only took one swipe. It also did not issue the declined and checksum receipts like it normally does.
|
Originally Posted by sanctified50
(Post 23657023)
Just loaded 6 OV at Kate (3 cards and then 10 min wait). 2 cards took 2 wipes and 4 of them only took one swipe. It also did not issue the declined and checksum receipts like it normally does.
No issues here. Not sure why people are calling it dead.... |
Originally Posted by Bean
(Post 23657089)
I also loaded 3 on my lunch break at Kate. One swipe for the first and two swipes each for the other two.
No issues here. Not sure why people are calling it dead.... Nah, couldn't be that. |
Originally Posted by prasha11
(Post 23656984)
OR there may not be any other card working to report.;)
|
Originally Posted by hamokmonky
(Post 23656890)
The original question is why no one was discussing other cards (not whether other cards were working).
Originally Posted by hamokmonky
(Post 23656890)
most people on FT rarely share what works, only what stops working in large quantities.
Originally Posted by hamokmonky
(Post 23656890)
So, if other cards were not working well, likely there would be numerous reports/threads created about those cards. The fact that there is not should be enough to infer that there is not likely to be an issue with them.
I missed out on a full 65 day cycle of AA EXEC apps, because I was only reading the AA Plat thread, and all of the posts were on the EXEC thread. If I'd known about that thread sooner, we would both have already gotten another 200K AA miles by now. But with FT, you don't hear about what you don't know already about... :( |
Originally Posted by granstagna
(Post 23656280)
Not really, usually the one that recognized me treat me well.... Of course I don't go through the multiple swipes exercise with them. Just a quick in and out a couple times a week.
|
Originally Posted by Brugge
(Post 23657127)
I hate that about FT. :mad: If we all would share what works, instead of trying to hoard it as our own little secret method, we would all have much more success in this game.
|
Originally Posted by sanctified50
(Post 23657023)
Just loaded 6 OV at Kate (3 cards and then 10 min wait). 2 cards took 2 wipes and 4 of them only took one swipe. It also did not issue the declined and checksum receipts like it normally does.
Originally Posted by Bean
(Post 23657089)
I also loaded 3 on my lunch break at Kate. One swipe for the first and two swipes each for the other two.
No issues here. Not sure why people are calling it dead.... |
Originally Posted by hamokmonky
(Post 23657235)
I agree to a certain extent. Things that are obviously loopholes like HIGC shouldnt get posted as they will get killed practically instantly (people were doing it for months and then it was killed within 2-3 days). Methods that are just that, methods, and not loopholes, should definitely be shared openly. But hey, my own little secret LOOPHOLE (not method) got closed down last week without it ever making it to FT or openly on the internet as far as I am aware. I can only imagine how long it wouldve lasted had it been posted several months ago. Probably about... two days....
|
Originally Posted by hamokmonky
(Post 23657235)
I agree to a certain extent. Things that are obviously loopholes like HIGC shouldnt get posted as they will get killed practically instantly (people were doing it for months and then it was killed within 2-3 days). Methods that are just that, methods, and not loopholes, should definitely be shared openly.....
You got in on the Hebsacker Internet Go Cup (HIGC) loophole? Lucky You. :p |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:31 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.