Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Strange LH priority boarding procedure.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2009, 4:19 am
  #1  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
Strange LH priority boarding procedure.

Flew FRA-EZE the other day in J.

I had read that compared to the likes of BA LH were damn good at priority boarding so it came as a big surprise when the whole process ended up being a complete shambles.
Boarding was to start at 09.35 from Gate B25 so we stood in the priority lane waiting to board. 09.35 came and went then a call was made that boarding was delayed for twenty minutes...we went and found a seat. A call came twenty minutes later informing us that a further delay of fifteen minutes was expected.
Eventually a call was made for pax with kids and the infirm to start boarding and we joined the priority line.Things started moving but only with the Y pax soon followed by us. Little did I know that this was only a document check we were going through and after that we were merged in with the Y pax to get our BPs scanned. Only one agent was scanning a fairly full 747 and it took forever to finally get through and on to the aircraft - an Irish fellow in front of me made a comment to the agent about being short staffed seeing as only one agent was dealing with the BP scanning of a 747....she wasn't amused.
We eventually left well over one hour late some of which must have been caused by the slow boarding procedure.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 5:20 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: FRA
Programs: LH, Avis, Hyatt, ...
Posts: 4,213
I don't understand, why it is so important to be the first on board for such a long flight.

On a second note, the boarding procedure has likely no influence at all on the delay. Seems, the aircraft was delayed anyway and so probably missed the initial slot. So they had to ask for the next available slot and stepped through the processes in order to meet that one.

Was once on a flight, where one pax (as usual) didn't find his way to the plane, so unloading of his checked luggage was required. Therefore we missed the slot and got the next available slot 2 hours later.
SleepOverGreenland is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 5:43 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
Programs: LH HON, BA Gold, EK Gold
Posts: 14,505
I fully agree, FRA boarding procedures can be a complete shambles at times.
Hope you had a good flight to EZE anyway !
Does Pucci know you flew Lufty ? Hairbrush coming your way ?
Rambuster is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 5:52 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
Originally Posted by SleepOverGreenland
I don't understand, why it is so important to be the first on board for such a long flight.
For me, no importance whatsoever but why have a priority boarding lane when in actual fact it wasn't?
I would have just taken a seat until everyone else had boarded if they had told me that they would be funnelling all passengers through the same BP check. I can only guess that they were short staffed hence only the one poor sod dealing with well over two hundred passengers.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 5:57 am
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
Originally Posted by Rambuster
I fully agree, FRA boarding procedures can be a complete shambles at times.
Hope you had a good flight to EZE anyway !
Does Pucci know you flew Lufty ? Hairbrush coming your way ?
She's gone AWOL.

Flight was okay but nothing out of the ordinary...all in a forthcoming trip report. I must say I do like the option of the LH day flight westbound.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 6:21 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,949
Originally Posted by HIDDY
I had read that compared to the likes of BA LH were damn good at priority boarding so it came as a big surprise when the whole process ended up being a complete shambles.
Although I've heard boarding at FRA can be a nightmare, all five of my trips there have been in or out on LH F, so I had the FCT and a car transfer to the aircraft.

It's too bad you weren't able to upgrade, but how was the flight to EZE in J?
macabus is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 6:32 am
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
Originally Posted by macabus
It's too bad you weren't able to upgrade, but how was the flight to EZE in J?
Not too keen on the seat I have to say. The crew were very nice though - alas the food like most J cabin food nowadays is just economy food served up on china plates. Still although we arrived at EZE an hour late we arrived safely which is the main thing. ^
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 6:59 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Berlin, Germany
Programs: LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 476
The separate doc check / BP check in LH is one the things why I prefer MUC to FRA.

My experience with FRA boarding is quite diverse: From very relaxed with multiple agents to HIDDY's experience. Somehow I have the impression that boarding to Asia / South America is all over the place while TATL flights are better off (except SQ 25, of course .
awestphal is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 7:48 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,949
Originally Posted by HIDDY
Not too keen on the seat I have to say. The crew were very nice though - alas the food like most J cabin food nowadays is just economy food served up on china plates. Still although we arrived at EZE an hour late we arrived safely which is the main thing. ^
A safe arrival is very good indeed.

A bit OT, but how was the TG flight? Did you get the new F? How was the food, drinks, service?

I can't wait around for the trip report...
macabus is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 7:58 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 739
Originally Posted by awestphal
Somehow I have the impression that boarding to Asia / South America is all over the place while TATL flights are better off
Uhm, flights to South America are TATL...
Bob'sYourUncle is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 8:18 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
Originally Posted by macabus
A safe arrival is very good indeed.

A bit OT, but how was the TG flight? Did you get the new F? How was the food, drinks, service?

I can't wait around for the trip report...
The flight was fine. I'm not one to get too excited about flying in F and to be honest after the fantastic ground experience it was always going to be a hard act to follow.
Must say compared to the BA F cabin the TG cabin was much more relaxing having only 10 seats against BAs 14. I would have much preferred the original midday flight we were booked on however. I find leaving near midnight I'm just too tired after a long day to enjoy it to the full. No complaints though and would do it again.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 12:14 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by HIDDY
..Eventually a call was made for pax with kids and the infirm to start boarding and we joined the priority line.Things started moving but only with the Y pax soon followed by us...
The socialist boarding procedures of LH are a constant source of grievance for me - being trained by North American carriers to be on board as early as possible to get a seat and overhead space.

So LH trained me thoroughly to board well after the "last call" annoucement as otherwise you have to queue behind all the folks with a sense of entitlement - people who are more than 50 years old or have an 18 year old kid, know someone in a wheelchair, or have an injured finger.
weero is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 12:14 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by SleepOverGreenland
I don't understand, why it is so important to be the first on board for such a long flight..
Because the gate areas in FRA are smelly, crowded, and barren of offerings perhaps?
weero is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 12:57 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
Originally Posted by weero
Because the gate areas in FRA are smelly, crowded, and barren of offerings perhaps?
thats why you stay in the lounge as long as possible...
sentom is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2009, 2:15 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 273
I transfer often in FRA and, although I generally like the airport, I do find the boarding procedures to be annoying. The airport wasn't built with priority boarding in mind. It was even worse before I became SEN and could use the lounges.
RoaminRoman is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.